• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种用于肝胆管结石病腹腔镜肝切除术的难度评分系统。

Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 463-707, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1148-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07479-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07479-7
PMID:32152674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A difficulty scoring system (DSS) based on the extent of liver resection, tumor location, liver function, tumor size, and tumor proximity to major vessels was previously developed to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Recently, we proposed a modified DSS for patients who undergo LLR for intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones. In this study, we validated the modified DSS for LLR for IHD stones.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of 121 patients who underwent LLR for IHD stones between July 2003 and November 2015 and validated the modified DSS in patients who underwent LLR according to their surgical outcomes. We divided the patients into subgroups according to their scores and compared the surgical outcomes, including hospital stay, operation time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and the postoperative complication rate and grade, among the subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

The DSS score ranged from 3 to 12 in LLR for IHD stones. The operation time (P < 0.001) significantly increased according to the DSS score. The median hospital stay after surgery (P = 0.024) and transfusion rate (P = 0.001) were significantly different among subgroups of patients divided by their difficulty scores. When we divided the patients into two groups based on the side of liver of resected, the operation time (P < 0.001), mean difficulty score (P < 0.001), and blood loss (P = 0.041) were greater in patients who underwent right liver resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical difficulty varies among patients undergoing the same LLR procedure for IHD stones. The modified DSS for IHD stones can effectively predict the surgery outcomes and complications of LLR.

摘要

背景

先前开发了一种基于肝切除范围、肿瘤位置、肝功能、肿瘤大小以及肿瘤与大血管毗邻程度的困难评分系统(DSS),以评估腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的难度。最近,我们提出了一种改良的 DSS,用于接受 LLR 治疗肝内胆管(IHD)结石的患者。在这项研究中,我们验证了改良的 DSS 用于治疗 IHD 结石的 LLR。

方法

我们回顾了 2003 年 7 月至 2015 年 11 月期间 121 例接受 LLR 治疗 IHD 结石的患者的临床资料,并根据手术结果验证了改良的 DSS。我们根据 DSS 评分将患者分为亚组,并比较了亚组患者的手术结果,包括住院时间、手术时间、出血量、输血率以及术后并发症的发生率和严重程度。

结果

LR 治疗 IHD 结石的 DSS 评分范围为 3 至 12 分。手术时间(P < 0.001)随 DSS 评分的增加而显著增加。根据困难评分,术后住院时间中位数(P = 0.024)和输血率(P = 0.001)在患者亚组之间存在显著差异。当我们根据切除肝的侧别将患者分为两组时,右半肝切除术患者的手术时间(P < 0.001)、平均难度评分(P < 0.001)和出血量(P = 0.041)均较大。

结论

接受相同 LLR 治疗 IHD 结石的患者手术难度存在差异。改良的 IHD 结石 DSS 可有效预测 LLR 的手术结果和并发症。

相似文献

1
Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis.验证一种用于肝胆管结石病腹腔镜肝切除术的难度评分系统。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1148-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07479-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
2
Validation of difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy.接受腹腔镜左外叶切除术患者的腹腔镜肝切除难度评分系统的验证
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):430-436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4994-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中难度评分系统DSS-B和DSS-ER的临床实用性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):12-18. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0150. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
Development and Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection to Treat Hepatolithiasis.腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石术难度评分系统的建立与验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 15;58(12):1847. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121847.
5
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 436 例经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4023-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left-sided hepatectomy for intrahepatic duct stones.腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):259-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4200-3. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
7
Laparoscopic open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 21;23(43):7791-7806. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7791.
8
External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.不同腹腔镜肝切除术困难评分系统用于肝细胞癌的外部验证。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3732-3749. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08687-5. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
10
Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石症的效果优于开腹肝切除术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Thulium laser-assisted laparoscopic management of intrahepatic stones in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: A case report and review of minimally invasive approaches.铥激光辅助腹腔镜治疗复发性化脓性胆管炎肝内结石:一例报告及微创治疗方法综述
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Mar;128:111005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111005. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
2
Development of a novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection procedure in patients with intrahepatic duct stones.肝内胆管结石患者腹腔镜肝切除手术新型难度评分系统的开发
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):3133-3141. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3133.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.腹腔镜肝切除术推荐意见:在盛冈召开的第二届国际共识会议报告
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):619-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184.
Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using augmented reality navigation plus ICG fluorescence imaging for hepatolithiasis: a retrospective single-arm cohort study (with video).
应用增强现实导航联合吲哚菁绿荧光成像行腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石:一项回顾性单臂队列研究(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):4048-4056. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10922-8. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Precise planning based on 3D-printed dry-laboratory models can reduce perioperative complications of laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatobiliary diseases: a preoperative cohort study.基于 3D 打印干式实验室模型的精确规划可以减少复杂肝胆疾病腹腔镜手术的围手术期并发症:一项术前队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 11;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02441-z.
5
Hepatolithiasis: Epidemiology, presentation, classification and management of a complex disease.肝内胆管结石:一种复杂疾病的流行病学、临床表现、分类及管理
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 7;30(13):1836-1850. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i13.1836.
6
A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research.腹腔镜胆管探查术难度分级系统的提出:对临床实践、培训和研究的益处。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7012-7023. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor.一种用于肝肿瘤腹腔镜肝切除术的新型难度评分系统。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:1019763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1019763. eCollection 2022.