Suppr超能文献

一项针对社区居住的患有空间忽视症的多发性中风幸存者的为期一年的随访研究。

A One-Year Follow-Up Study on Community Dwelling Multiple Stroke Survivors with Spatial Neglect.

作者信息

Hreha Kimberly, Rich Timothy, Wong Jennifer

机构信息

Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Occup Ther Health Care. 2020 Jan;34(1):48-61. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2020.1737894. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Abstract

This study assessed nine participants, who sustained multiple strokes and had spatial neglect, one year after participation in a prior trial on whether Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) was a feasible and effective treatment for spatial neglect remediation compared to standard care. The objectives were to: (1) describe the sample, (2) measure the degree of spatial neglect symptoms if present, and (3) determine group differences in motor and spatial performance. Three (60%) participants from the PAT group and two (50%) from the comparison group still displayed spatial neglect. A series of two-way mixed ANOVAs exploring group (PAT vs. comparison of standard care) and time effects (pretest vs. posttest vs. follow-up) found a main effect of time for all participants on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment (F(1,2) = 30.28, p<.001), Functional Independence Measure (F(1,2) = 16.998, p<.001), and star cancelation (F(1,2) = 11.077, p<.001). An interaction effect of time*prism was observed when assessing the line bisection test (F(1,2) = 6.986, p = .008), suggesting that the PAT group performed significantly better on this test. Additional research should be completed with a larger sample in order to better understand the PAT long term effects as well as develop clinical recommendations for occupational therapy practitioners.

摘要

本研究评估了9名曾患多次中风且有空间忽视症状的参与者,这些参与者曾参与过一项关于棱镜适应疗法(PAT)与标准护理相比,在修复空间忽视方面是否可行且有效的前期试验,此次评估是在该试验一年后进行的。研究目的如下:(1)描述样本;(2)测量空间忽视症状的程度(若存在);(3)确定运动和空间表现方面的组间差异。PAT组的3名(60%)参与者和对照组的2名(50%)参与者仍表现出空间忽视。一系列双向混合方差分析探索了组间差异(PAT组与标准护理对照组)和时间效应(前测与后测与随访),结果发现,所有参与者在凯斯勒基金会忽视评估(F(1,2) = 30.28,p <.001)、功能独立性测量(F(1,2) = 16.998,p <.001)和星形删除测试(F(1,2) = 11.077,p <.001)方面,时间存在主效应。在评估直线二等分测试时观察到时间*棱镜的交互效应(F(1,2) = 6.986,p = .008),这表明PAT组在该测试中的表现明显更好。为了更好地了解PAT的长期效果,并为职业治疗从业者制定临床建议,应使用更大的样本完成进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验