Hreha Kimberly, Rich Timothy, Wong Jennifer
Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Occup Ther Health Care. 2020 Jan;34(1):48-61. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2020.1737894. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
This study assessed nine participants, who sustained multiple strokes and had spatial neglect, one year after participation in a prior trial on whether Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) was a feasible and effective treatment for spatial neglect remediation compared to standard care. The objectives were to: (1) describe the sample, (2) measure the degree of spatial neglect symptoms if present, and (3) determine group differences in motor and spatial performance. Three (60%) participants from the PAT group and two (50%) from the comparison group still displayed spatial neglect. A series of two-way mixed ANOVAs exploring group (PAT vs. comparison of standard care) and time effects (pretest vs. posttest vs. follow-up) found a main effect of time for all participants on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment (F(1,2) = 30.28, p<.001), Functional Independence Measure (F(1,2) = 16.998, p<.001), and star cancelation (F(1,2) = 11.077, p<.001). An interaction effect of time*prism was observed when assessing the line bisection test (F(1,2) = 6.986, p = .008), suggesting that the PAT group performed significantly better on this test. Additional research should be completed with a larger sample in order to better understand the PAT long term effects as well as develop clinical recommendations for occupational therapy practitioners.
本研究评估了9名曾患多次中风且有空间忽视症状的参与者,这些参与者曾参与过一项关于棱镜适应疗法(PAT)与标准护理相比,在修复空间忽视方面是否可行且有效的前期试验,此次评估是在该试验一年后进行的。研究目的如下:(1)描述样本;(2)测量空间忽视症状的程度(若存在);(3)确定运动和空间表现方面的组间差异。PAT组的3名(60%)参与者和对照组的2名(50%)参与者仍表现出空间忽视。一系列双向混合方差分析探索了组间差异(PAT组与标准护理对照组)和时间效应(前测与后测与随访),结果发现,所有参与者在凯斯勒基金会忽视评估(F(1,2) = 30.28,p <.001)、功能独立性测量(F(1,2) = 16.998,p <.001)和星形删除测试(F(1,2) = 11.077,p <.001)方面,时间存在主效应。在评估直线二等分测试时观察到时间*棱镜的交互效应(F(1,2) = 6.986,p = .008),这表明PAT组在该测试中的表现明显更好。为了更好地了解PAT的长期效果,并为职业治疗从业者制定临床建议,应使用更大的样本完成进一步研究。