• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measurement Error in Discrete Health Facility Choice Models: an Example from Urban Senegal.离散卫生设施选择模型中的测量误差:来自塞内加尔城市的一个例子
J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl). 2019 Nov-Dec;34(7):1102-1120. doi: 10.1002/jae.2739. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
The tradeoff between price and quality of services in the Philippines.菲律宾服务价格与质量之间的权衡。
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jan;46(2):227-42. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00152-4.
3
The effects of health facility access and quality on family planning decisions in urban Senegal.塞内加尔城市地区医疗设施的可及性和质量对计划生育决策的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):576-591. doi: 10.1002/hec.3615. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
4
Women's preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery.农村埃塞俄比亚女性对产科护理的偏好:在一个低设施分娩率地区进行的基于人群的离散选择实验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):984-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.087973. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
5
Preferences for Sun Protection With a Self-Monitoring App: Protocol of a Discrete Choice Experiment Study.使用自我监测应用程序进行防晒的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 8;9(2):e16087. doi: 10.2196/16087.
6
Assessment of Bypass of the Nearest Primary Health Care Facility Among Women in Ghana.加纳妇女对最近初级卫生保健机构的回避评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012552. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12552.
7
Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.调查消费者和非正式护理人员对消费者导向型护理的看法和偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
The influence of travel time on emergency obstetric care seeking behavior in the urban poor of Bangladesh: a GIS study.出行时间对孟加拉国城市贫困人口寻求紧急产科护理行为的影响:一项地理信息系统研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1032-7.
9
Investigating consumer hospital choice: Demand and supply-side levers could address health care costs.调查消费者对医院的选择:需求和供给侧的杠杆可以解决医疗成本问题。
Healthc (Amst). 2019 Sep;7(3):100353. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Returning home to die or leaving home to seek health care? Location of death of urban and rural residents in Burkina Faso and Senegal.回家等死还是离家寻求医疗救治?布基纳法索和塞内加尔城乡居民的死亡地点
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1475040. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1475040.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice of a family planning outlet in urban areas: The role of distance and quality of services in Kenya and Uganda.城市地区计划生育服务机构的选择:距离和服务质量在肯尼亚和乌干达所起的作用。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 30;4:1117849. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1117849. eCollection 2023.
2
Does Provider Bias Affect Choice of a Facility for Family Planning Services by Women in Urban Senegal?城市塞内加尔妇女选择计划生育服务机构时是否存在提供者偏见?
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Mar;53(1):133-151. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12181. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to uptake of antenatal maternal screening tests in Senegal.塞内加尔产前孕产妇筛查检测的接受障碍。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Oct 13;2:784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.10.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
The effects of health facility access and quality on family planning decisions in urban Senegal.塞内加尔城市地区医疗设施的可及性和质量对计划生育决策的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):576-591. doi: 10.1002/hec.3615. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands.患者是否会选择质量评级高的医院?来自荷兰血管成形术市场的经验证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Mar;31(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
5
Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes.消费者对公开报告的质量信息有反应吗?来自养老院的证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
6
Expanding health insurance to increase health care utilization: will it have different effects in rural vs. urban areas?扩大医疗保险范围以增加医疗保健利用率:它在农村和城市地区会产生不同的效果吗?
Health Policy. 2011 May;100(2-3):273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
7
Universal health care and the removal of user fees.全民医疗保健与取消用户费用。
Lancet. 2009 Jun 13;373(9680):2078-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60258-0. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
8
Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics.市场会对质量信息做出反应吗?生育诊所的案例。
J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services.健康保险和医疗服务市场中的质量与消费者决策
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1 Suppl):28S-52S. doi: 10.1177/1077558708325887. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
10
Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.开始传播这一消息:纽约医院报告卡影响的结构估计。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

离散卫生设施选择模型中的测量误差:来自塞内加尔城市的一个例子

Measurement Error in Discrete Health Facility Choice Models: an Example from Urban Senegal.

作者信息

Cronin Christopher J, Guilkey David K, Speizer Ilene S

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame.

Department of Economics and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl). 2019 Nov-Dec;34(7):1102-1120. doi: 10.1002/jae.2739. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/jae.2739
PMID:32153316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7062358/
Abstract

We use individual-level health facility choice data from urban Senegal to estimate consumer preferences for facility characteristics related to maternal health services. We find that consumers consider a large number of quality related facility characteristics, as well as travel costs, when making their health facility choice. In contrast to the typical assumption in the literature, our findings indicate that individuals frequently bypass the facility nearest their home. In light of this, we show that the mismeasured data used commonly in the literature produces biased preference estimates; most notably, the literature likely overestimates consumer distaste for travel.

摘要

我们使用来自塞内加尔城市地区的个人层面的医疗设施选择数据,来估计消费者对与孕产妇健康服务相关的设施特征的偏好。我们发现,消费者在选择医疗设施时会考虑大量与质量相关的设施特征以及交通成本。与文献中的典型假设不同,我们的研究结果表明,个人常常会绕过离家最近的设施。鉴于此,我们表明,文献中常用的测量有误的数据会产生有偏差的偏好估计;最值得注意的是,文献可能高估了消费者对出行的反感程度。