• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。

Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.

作者信息

Santos Rita, Gravelle Hugh, Propper Carol

机构信息

University of York.

University of Bristol Imperial College London and CEPR.

出版信息

Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1111/ecoj.12282
PMID:28356602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5349292/
Abstract

Reforms giving users of public services choice of provider aim to improve quality. But such reforms will work only if quality affects choice of provider. We test this crucial prerequisite in the English health care market by examining the choice of 3.4 million individuals of family doctor. Family doctor practices provide primary care and control access to non-emergency hospital care, the quality of their clinical care is measured and published and care is free. In this setting, clinical quality should affect choice. We find that a 1 standard deviation increase in clinical quality would increase practice size by around 17%.

摘要

赋予公共服务用户选择服务提供者权利的改革旨在提高服务质量。但只有当质量影响服务提供者的选择时,此类改革才会起作用。我们通过研究340万个人对家庭医生的选择,来检验英国医疗保健市场中的这一关键前提条件。家庭医生诊所提供初级医疗服务并控制非急诊医院护理的就诊机会,其临床护理质量会被衡量并公布,且医疗服务是免费的。在这种情况下,临床质量应该会影响选择。我们发现,临床质量提高1个标准差会使诊所规模增加约17%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/4bdcd5759c0d/ECOJ-127-445-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/d312363c8c39/ECOJ-127-445-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/8a20d1c38290/ECOJ-127-445-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/826fce3a133a/ECOJ-127-445-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/97b9233fb7fb/ECOJ-127-445-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/4bdcd5759c0d/ECOJ-127-445-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/d312363c8c39/ECOJ-127-445-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/8a20d1c38290/ECOJ-127-445-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/826fce3a133a/ECOJ-127-445-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/97b9233fb7fb/ECOJ-127-445-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4854/5349292/4bdcd5759c0d/ECOJ-127-445-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
3
Performance of new alternative providers of primary care services in England: an observational study.英格兰新型基层医疗服务替代提供者的表现:一项观察性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2015 May;108(5):171-83. doi: 10.1177/0141076815583303. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Spatial competition and quality: Evidence from the English family doctor market.空间竞争与质量:来自英国家庭医生市场的证据。
J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;68:102249. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102249. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
6
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
7
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.以学校为基础的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁确诊哮喘儿童生活质量和哮喘发作次数的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335.
8
Exploring determinants of health provider choice and heterogeneity in preference among outpatients in Beijing: a labelled discrete choice experiment.探讨北京门诊患者选择卫生服务提供者的决定因素和偏好异质性:一项标记离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e023363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363.
9
Patient choice, entry, and the quality of primary care: Evidence from Swedish reforms.患者选择、入门和初级保健质量:来自瑞典改革的证据。
Health Econ. 2020 Jun;29(6):716-730. doi: 10.1002/hec.4015. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners.强制性质量改进框架各组成部分的可接受性:瑞士全科医生调查
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jun 21;18:11786329251346828. doi: 10.1177/11786329251346828. eCollection 2025.
2
Influencing factors of patients' behavior of healthcare seeking: a meta-analysis in China.中国患者就医行为的影响因素:一项Meta分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1583075. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1583075. eCollection 2025.
3
Healthcare resource allocation and patient choice: evidence from rural China.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery.信息在医疗市场中的作用:心脏手术公开报告结果分析
Am Econ Rev. 2004;94(2):342-6. doi: 10.1257/0002828041301993.
2
Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms.医院竞争能挽救生命吗?来自英国国民医疗服务体系患者选择改革的证据。
Econ J (London). 2011 Aug;121(554):F228-F260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x.
3
Potential impact of removing general practice boundaries in England: a policy analysis.
医疗资源分配与患者选择:来自中国农村的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 31;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02450-1.
4
The effect of health insurance reimbursement rates on middle-aged and elderly people's hospital choices: evidence from China.医疗保险报销比例对中老年人群医院选择的影响:来自中国的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00606-x.
5
Incidence of postoperative complications is underestimated if outcome data are recorded by interns and first year residents in a low volume hospital setting.如果低容量医院环境中的住院医师和第一年住院医师记录手术并发症的数据,那么术后并发症的发生率就会被低估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):17009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67754-8.
6
Measuring competition in primary care-Evidence from Sweden.衡量初级保健中的竞争——来自瑞典的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 15;19(7):e0304994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304994. eCollection 2024.
7
Social Medical Insurances, Choices of Medical Institutions and the 'Siphon Effect' in the Health Service Market: Evidence from 2021 Yangtze River Delta Region of China.社会医疗保险、医疗机构选择与医疗服务市场中的“虹吸效应”:来自2021年中国长江三角洲地区的证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 May 16;17:1287-1299. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S458178. eCollection 2024.
8
Americans do not select their doctors based on race.美国人不会基于种族来选择他们的医生。
Front Sociol. 2024 Jan 24;8:1191080. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1191080. eCollection 2023.
9
How do family doctors respond to reduced waiting times for cancer diagnosis in secondary care?家庭医生如何应对二级保健中癌症诊断等待时间的缩短?
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jul;25(5):813-828. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01626-2. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
10
Optimal information disclosure strategy in the primary healthcare service market: From the perspective of signaling theory.基层医疗服务市场中的最优信息披露策略:基于信号传递理论的视角
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:959032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959032. eCollection 2022.
取消英格兰全科医疗界限的潜在影响:一项政策分析。
Health Policy. 2014 Dec;118(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
4
Hospital activity and cost incurred because of unregistered patients in England: considerations for current and new commissioners.英国未登记患者导致的医院活动和费用:对现任和新任专员的考虑。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):590-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds098. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
5
Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands.患者是否会选择质量评级高的医院?来自荷兰血管成形术市场的经验证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Mar;31(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
6
Cognitive function, numeracy and retirement saving trajectories.认知功能、计算能力与退休储蓄轨迹。
Econ J (London). 2011 Nov;120(548):F381-F410. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02395.x.
7
Choice policies in Northern European health systems.北欧医疗体系中的选择政策。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Jan;7(1):47-71. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000302.
8
Birds of a feather flock together: a study of doctor-patient matching.物以类聚,人以群分:医患匹配研究。
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Patient switching in general practice.患者在全科医疗中的转换。
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
The effect of waiting time and distance on hospital choice for English cataract patients.等待时间和距离对英国白内障患者选择医院的影响。
Health Econ. 2012 Apr;21(4):444-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.1720. Epub 2011 Mar 7.