• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打破注意力优先级地图平衡 基于注视的显示会引发类似忽视的视觉探索。

Unbalancing the Attentional Priority Map Gaze-Contingent Displays Induces Neglect-Like Visual Exploration.

作者信息

Machner Björn, Lencer Marie C, Möller Lisa, von der Gablentz Janina, Heide Wolfgang, Helmchen Christoph, Sprenger Andreas

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 20;14:41. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00041. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00041
PMID:32153377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045871/
Abstract

Selective spatial attention is a crucial cognitive process that guides us to the behaviorally relevant objects in a complex visual world by using exploratory eye movements. The spatial location of objects, their (bottom-up) saliency and (top-down) relevance is assumed to be encoded in one "attentional priority map" in the brain, using different egocentric (eye-, head- and trunk-centered) spatial reference frames. In patients with hemispatial neglect, this map is supposed to be imbalanced, leading to a spatially biased exploration of the visual environment. As a proof of concept, we altered the visual saliency (and thereby attentional priority) of objects in a naturalistic scene along a left-right spatial gradient and investigated whether this can induce a bias in the exploratory eye movements of healthy humans ( = 28; all right-handed; mean age: 23 years, range 19-48). We developed a computerized mask, using high-end "gaze-contingent display (GCD)" technology, that immediately and continuously reduced the saliency of objects on the left-"left" with respect to the head (body-centered) and the current position on the retina (eye-centered). In both experimental conditions, task-free viewing and goal-driven visual search, this modification induced a mild but significant bias in visual exploration similar to hemispatial neglect. Accordingly, global eye movement parameters changed (reduced number and increased duration of fixations) and the spatial distribution of fixations indicated an attentional bias towards the right (rightward shift of first orienting, fixations favoring the scene's outmost right over left). Our results support the concept of an attentional priority map in the brain as an interface between perception and behavior and as one pathophysiological ground of hemispatial neglect.

摘要

选择性空间注意是一种关键的认知过程,它通过探索性眼动引导我们在复杂的视觉世界中关注与行为相关的物体。物体的空间位置、它们的(自下而上的)显著性和(自上而下的)相关性被假定在大脑中的一个“注意优先级地图”中进行编码,使用不同的以自我为中心(以眼睛、头部和躯干为中心)的空间参考框架。在半侧空间忽视患者中,这个地图被认为是不平衡的,导致对视觉环境的空间偏向性探索。作为概念验证,我们沿着左右空间梯度改变了自然场景中物体的视觉显著性(从而改变了注意优先级),并研究了这是否会在健康人类(n = 28;均为右利手;平均年龄:23岁,范围19 - 48岁)的探索性眼动中诱发偏向。我们使用高端的“注视相关显示(GCD)”技术开发了一种计算机化掩模,它能立即并持续降低相对于头部(以身体为中心)和视网膜上当前位置(以眼睛为中心)左侧物体的显著性。在两种实验条件下,即无任务观看和目标驱动的视觉搜索,这种改变诱发了一种类似于半侧空间忽视的轻微但显著的视觉探索偏向。相应地,全局眼动参数发生了变化(注视次数减少,注视持续时间增加),注视的空间分布表明存在向右的注意偏向(首次定向的向右偏移,注视更倾向于场景最右侧而非左侧)。我们的结果支持了大脑中注意优先级地图这一概念,它是感知与行为之间的接口,也是半侧空间忽视的一种病理生理基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/23cb7451cf27/fnhum-14-00041-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/2ca744a4b8f4/fnhum-14-00041-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/8fb4158839d4/fnhum-14-00041-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/7a00d2951587/fnhum-14-00041-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/23cb7451cf27/fnhum-14-00041-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/2ca744a4b8f4/fnhum-14-00041-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/8fb4158839d4/fnhum-14-00041-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/7a00d2951587/fnhum-14-00041-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c2/7045871/23cb7451cf27/fnhum-14-00041-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Unbalancing the Attentional Priority Map Gaze-Contingent Displays Induces Neglect-Like Visual Exploration.打破注意力优先级地图平衡 基于注视的显示会引发类似忽视的视觉探索。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 20;14:41. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00041. eCollection 2020.
2
Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.注视相关显示技术有助于减少脑卒中后偏侧空间忽略症的对侧注视偏向。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Nov 16;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01104-5.
3
Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.动态自下而上特征和自上而下控制对视空间忽略症患者对移动真实场景视觉探索的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2415-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
4
Space exploration in neglect.太空探索被忽视。
Brain. 1998 Dec;121 ( Pt 12):2357-67. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.12.2357.
5
Left hemispatial neglect and overt orienting in naturalistic conditions: Role of high-level and stimulus-driven signals.左侧空间忽略与自然状态下的外显转向:高水平和刺激驱动信号的作用。
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:329-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Rightward exogenous attentional shifts impair perceptual memory of spatial locations in patients with left unilateral spatial neglect.向右的外源性注意力转移会损害左侧单侧空间忽视患者对空间位置的感知记忆。
Cortex. 2020 Jan;122:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Distorted gaze direction input to attentional priority map in spatial neglect.空间忽视中注意力优先映射的扭曲注视方向输入。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
The influence of naturalistic, directionally non-specific motion on the spatial deployment of visual attention in right-hemispheric stroke.自然主义的、方向非特定运动对右半球中风患者视觉注意力空间分布的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
The role of visual saliency for the allocation of attention: Evidence from spatial neglect and hemianopia.视觉显著性在注意力分配中的作用:来自空间忽视和偏盲的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 6.
10
Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.更靠右:在视觉探索过程中,观察距离会调节注意力不对称性(“假性忽视”)。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Feb;129:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.眼动追踪基础 第4部分:进行眼动追踪研究的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 6;57(1):46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.
2
Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.注视相关显示技术有助于减少脑卒中后偏侧空间忽略症的对侧注视偏向。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Nov 16;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01104-5.
3
Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network Relates to Behavioral Performance in Spatial Attention Tasks and May Show Task-Related Adaptation.

本文引用的文献

1
The ipsilesional attention bias in right-hemisphere stroke patients as revealed by a realistic visual search task: Neuroanatomical correlates and functional relevance.通过逼真视觉搜索任务揭示的右半球中风患者的患侧注意偏向:神经解剖学关联及功能相关性
Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):850-865. doi: 10.1037/neu0000493.
2
Eye-Tracking Provides a Sensitive Measure of Exploration Deficits After Acute Right MCA Stroke.眼动追踪为急性右侧大脑中动脉卒中后探索缺陷提供了一种敏感的测量方法。
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 11;9:359. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00359. eCollection 2018.
3
Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry.
背侧注意网络中的静息态功能连接与空间注意任务中的行为表现相关,且可能表现出任务相关的适应性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 10;15:757128. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757128. eCollection 2021.
视觉搜索中的假性忽视:模拟神经回路中的行为证据和连接约束。
eNeuro. 2017 Dec 28;4(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
4
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention.选择性视觉注意的神经机制。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:47-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400.
5
Are All Spatial Reference Frames Egocentric? Reinterpreting Evidence for Allocentric, Object-Centered, or World-Centered Reference Frames.所有空间参照系都是以自我为中心的吗?重新解读关于以他者为中心、以物体为中心或以世界为中心的参照系的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 9;9:648. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00648. eCollection 2015.
6
The role of visual saliency for the allocation of attention: Evidence from spatial neglect and hemianopia.视觉显著性在注意力分配中的作用:来自空间忽视和偏盲的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning.通过基于奖励的学习来改变空间优先级图。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 18;34(25):8594-604. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-14.2014.
8
Advanced analysis of free visual exploration patterns in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中自由视觉探索模式的高级分析。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 11;4:737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00737. eCollection 2013.
9
Maps of space in human frontoparietal cortex.人类额顶叶皮质中的空间图谱。
J Physiol Paris. 2013 Dec;107(6):510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Spatial neglect and the neural coding of attentional priority.空间忽视与注意优先级的神经编码。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 May;37(4):705-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 4.