• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索中的假性忽视:模拟神经回路中的行为证据和连接约束。

Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry.

机构信息

Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy.

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7225, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière ICM, 75013 Paris, France.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2017 Dec 28;4(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017
PMID:29291241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5745611/
Abstract

Most people tend to bisect horizontal lines slightly to the left of their true center (pseudoneglect) and start visual search from left-sided items. This physiological leftward spatial bias may depend on hemispheric asymmetries in the organization of attentional networks, but the precise mechanisms are unknown. Here, we modeled relevant aspects of the ventral and dorsal attentional networks (VAN and DAN) of the human brain. First, we demonstrated pseudoneglect in visual search in 101 right-handed psychology students. Participants consistently tended to start the task from a left-sided item, thus showing pseudoneglect. Second, we trained populations of simulated neurorobots to perform a similar task, by using a genetic algorithm. The neurorobots' behavior was controlled by artificial neural networks, which simulated the human VAN and DAN in the two brain hemispheres. Neurorobots differed in the connectional constraints that were applied to the anatomy and function of the attention networks. Results indicated that (1) neurorobots provided with a biologically plausible hemispheric asymmetry of the VAN-DAN connections, as well as with interhemispheric inhibition, displayed the best match with human data; however; (2) anatomical asymmetry per se was not sufficient to generate pseudoneglect; in addition, the VAN must have an excitatory influence on the ipsilateral DAN; and (3) neurorobots provided with bilateral competence in the VAN but without interhemispheric inhibition failed to display pseudoneglect. These findings provide a proof of concept of the causal link between connectional asymmetries and pseudoneglect and specify important biological constraints that result in physiological asymmetries of human behavior.

摘要

大多数人倾向于将水平线略微偏左于其真实中心(假性忽视),并从左侧的项目开始视觉搜索。这种生理上的左侧空间偏向可能取决于注意力网络组织中的半球不对称,但确切的机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们模拟了人类大脑腹侧和背侧注意力网络(VAN 和 DAN)的相关方面。首先,我们在 101 名右利手心理学学生的视觉搜索中证明了假性忽视。参与者始终倾向于从左侧的项目开始任务,因此表现出假性忽视。其次,我们通过遗传算法训练了模拟神经机器人来执行类似的任务。神经机器人的行为由人工神经网络控制,该网络模拟了人类大脑左右半球的 VAN 和 DAN。神经机器人在注意力网络的解剖结构和功能上的连接约束方面存在差异。结果表明:(1)提供了具有生物学意义的 VAN-DAN 连接半球不对称性以及半球间抑制的神经机器人,与人类数据的匹配最好;然而;(2)解剖学上的不对称性本身不足以产生假性忽视;此外,VAN 必须对同侧 DAN 具有兴奋性影响;(3)提供双侧 VAN 能力但没有半球间抑制的神经机器人未能表现出假性忽视。这些发现提供了连接不对称性和假性忽视之间因果关系的概念证明,并确定了导致人类行为生理不对称的重要生物学约束。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/582b965718c9/enu0061724930010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/b77e271d52ca/enu0061724930001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/8b2cbbe7f103/enu0061724930002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/25eed8a7e627/enu0061724930003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/3e4a11e0065a/enu0061724930004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/9e478404c81a/enu0061724930005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/e1485a8466bf/enu0061724930006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/bf5ba9a3c31b/enu0061724930007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/05a268e8c9b3/enu0061724930008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/be5956755726/enu0061724930009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/582b965718c9/enu0061724930010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/b77e271d52ca/enu0061724930001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/8b2cbbe7f103/enu0061724930002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/25eed8a7e627/enu0061724930003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/3e4a11e0065a/enu0061724930004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/9e478404c81a/enu0061724930005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/e1485a8466bf/enu0061724930006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/bf5ba9a3c31b/enu0061724930007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/05a268e8c9b3/enu0061724930008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/be5956755726/enu0061724930009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/5745611/582b965718c9/enu0061724930010.jpg

相似文献

1
Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry.视觉搜索中的假性忽视:模拟神经回路中的行为证据和连接约束。
eNeuro. 2017 Dec 28;4(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
2
Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.空间注意和视觉意识的共同机制证据:朝向假性忽视的建构效度。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0212998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212998. eCollection 2019.
3
The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task.大脑不对称性和眼动扫描对视觉搜索任务中假性忽视的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
4
Mapping the anatomy of perceptual pseudoneglect. A multivariate approach.知觉假偏侧现象解剖结构的研究。一种多元分析方法。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116402. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116402. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.触觉、视觉和听觉模态下成人假性忽视的发展轨迹以及起始位置和刺激长度的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Mar;103:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.右手使用者在直线二等分判断中的假性忽视与右半球空间注意优势的调节有关。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.假性忽视中基线方向差异对注意力分散的影响。
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.语言产生的半球特化与空间注意力之间的关联取决于左手偏好强度。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt B):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
Testing the inter-hemispheric competition account of visual extinction with combined TMS/fMRI.采用经颅磁刺激/功能磁共振成像联合技术检验视觉消退的半球间竞争理论
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
10
Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.假性忽视中空间注意测量的任务内和任务间可靠性
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138379. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Attentional biases, as measured by motion-induced blindness, are linked to schizophrenia traits.通过运动诱导失明测量的注意力偏差与精神分裂症特征有关。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325609. eCollection 2025.
2
Focal attention peaks and laterality bias in problem gamblers: an eye-tracking investigation.问题赌徒的焦点注意力峰值和偏侧性偏差:一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10238-w. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
Modulation of initial leftward bias in visual search by parietal tDCS.

本文引用的文献

1
Fronto-parietal organization for response times in inhibition of return: The FORTIOR model.额顶区对返回抑制中反应时的组织作用:FORTIOR 模型。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:176-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
2
The Computational Anatomy of Visual Neglect.视觉忽视的计算解剖学。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Feb 1;28(2):777-790. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx316.
3
Let thy left brain know what thy right brain doeth: Inter-hemispheric compensation of functional deficits after brain damage.让你的左脑知晓你的右脑所做之事:脑损伤后功能缺陷的半球间代偿。
顶叶经颅直流电刺激对视觉搜索中初始向左偏向的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315715. eCollection 2024.
4
Sustained attention and the flash grab effect.持续注意力与瞬间抓取效应。
J Vis. 2024 Feb 1;24(2):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.2.6.
5
Fronto-parietal networks shape human conscious report through attention gain and reorienting.额顶网络通过注意力增益和重新定向来塑造人类有意识的报告。
Commun Biol. 2023 Jul 15;6(1):730. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05108-2.
6
When neuro-robots go wrong: A review.当神经机器人出现故障时:综述
Front Neurorobot. 2023 Feb 3;17:1112839. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1112839. eCollection 2023.
7
Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.注视相关显示技术有助于减少脑卒中后偏侧空间忽略症的对侧注视偏向。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Nov 16;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01104-5.
8
Top-down control of the left visual field bias in cued visual spatial attention.自上而下控制提示视觉空间注意中的左视野偏向。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 25;33(9):5097-5107. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac402.
9
Connectivity alterations underlying the breakdown of pseudoneglect: New insights from healthy and pathological aging.假性忽视障碍背后的连接性改变:来自健康老龄化和病理性老龄化的新见解。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;14:930877. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.930877. eCollection 2022.
10
Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation.后顶叶皮层内空间表示在视动适应过程中的动态变化。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Mar 21;33(7):3651-3663. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac298.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt B):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model.单侧空间忽视中的侧向专业化:一种认知机器人模型。
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0761-x. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
5
Reconciling Saliency and Object Center-Bias Hypotheses in Explaining Free-Viewing Fixations.协调突显和目标中心偏差假说解释自由观看注视点。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2016 Jun;27(6):1214-26. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2480683. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Asymmetry of interhemispheric communication.大脑两半球间的通讯不对称性。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 May;1(3):433-438. doi: 10.1002/wcs.53. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
7
Neuromodelling based on evolutionary robotics: on the importance of motor control for spatial attention.基于进化机器人技术的神经建模:论运动控制对空间注意力的重要性。
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:237-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0714-9.
8
Functional evolution of new and expanded attention networks in humans.人类新的和扩展的注意力网络的功能进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 28;112(30):9454-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420395112. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study.慢性视觉忽视的白质损伤预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Brain. 2015 Mar;138(Pt 3):746-60. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu389. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Spatial biases in viewing behavior.观看行为中的空间偏差。
J Vis. 2014 Feb 25;14(2):20. doi: 10.1167/14.2.20.