Bø Simen, Wolff Katharina
Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00218. eCollection 2020.
Climate change is statistical, abstract and difficult to comprehend directly. Imagining a specific, personal episode where you experience consequences of climate change in the future (episodic future thinking) may bring climate change closer, thus increasing the perceived risk of climate-related risk events. We conducted an experiment to test whether episodic future thinking increased the perceived risk of climate-related risk events and climate change in general, as compared to thinking about the future in a general, abstract manner (semantic future thinking). We also tested whether this effect is moderated by how easy it is to imagine the specific climate-related risk event initially. Participants were randomly assigned to an episodic future thinking-condition or a semantic future thinking-condition, and two of the risk events in each condition were related to flooding (difficult to imagine) and two were related to extreme temperature (easy to imagine). The results show no main effect of episodic future thinking on perceived risk, and no interaction effect with imaginability. Contrary to expectations and earlier research, this suggests that episodic future thinking may not influence risk perception.
气候变化具有统计学特征,较为抽象,难以直接理解。设想一个具体的、个人在未来经历气候变化后果的情景(情景式未来思维)可能会让气候变化变得更贴近,从而增加对气候相关风险事件的感知风险。我们进行了一项实验,以测试与以一般的、抽象的方式思考未来(语义式未来思维)相比,情景式未来思维是否会增加对气候相关风险事件和总体气候变化的感知风险。我们还测试了这种效应是否会受到最初想象特定气候相关风险事件的难易程度的调节。参与者被随机分配到情景式未来思维条件组或语义式未来思维条件组,每个条件组中的两个风险事件与洪水有关(难以想象),另外两个与极端温度有关(易于想象)。结果显示,情景式未来思维对感知风险没有主效应,与可想象性也没有交互效应。与预期和早期研究相反,这表明情景式未来思维可能不会影响风险感知。