• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同超声洁牙器和抛光设备作用于人体牙齿导致的牙根表面磨损及粗糙度比较:一项体外研究

Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study.

作者信息

Mahiroglu Muhammed Bedir, Kahramanoglu Erkut, Ay Mustafa, Kuru Leyla, Agrali Omer Birkan

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 7;8(1):55. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010055.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8010055
PMID:32155974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7151259/
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randomly assigned into eight groups according to the applied scaler type (Ma = Magnetostrictive, Pi = Piezoelectric), degree of power (M = Medium, F = Full), and angulation (0° and 45°). In the second stage, the specimens (n = 40) were further divided into two groups according to the applied polishing device (nylon bristle brush or rubber prophy cup). Laser scanner and contact profilometer devices were used for the surface analysis. Both ultrasonic instruments tested in our study produced rougher surfaces when full power was used at a 0° angle ( < 0.01). The highest wear (0.82 ± 0.07 mm) and roughness values (0.30 ± 0.01 µm) were detected in the PiF0 group. Polishing performed with a rubber prophy cup resulted in almost twice the wear as well as a smoother surface when compared to polishing performed with a nylon bristle brush ( < 0.001). Variations in the application parameters of ultrasonic scalers and the type of polishing instrument might lead to significantly different root-surface characteristics.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较专业口腔卫生器械,包括超声洁牙器、橡胶抛光杯和尼龙刷毛牙刷,对拔除的人下颌切牙牙根表面造成的磨损和粗糙度。根据所使用的洁牙器类型(Ma = 磁致伸缩式,Pi = 压电式)、功率大小(M = 中等,F = 全功率)和角度(0°和45°),将80颗牙齿随机分为八组。在第二阶段,根据所使用的抛光器械(尼龙刷毛牙刷或橡胶抛光杯),将40个样本进一步分为两组。使用激光扫描仪和接触式轮廓仪进行表面分析。在本研究中测试的两种超声器械,当以0°角使用全功率时,都会产生更粗糙的表面(P < 0.01)。在PiF0组中检测到最高的磨损量(0.82±0.07毫米)和粗糙度值(0.30±0.01微米)。与使用尼龙刷毛牙刷进行抛光相比,使用橡胶抛光杯进行抛光导致的磨损几乎是其两倍,且表面更光滑(P < 0.001)。超声洁牙器应用参数的变化以及抛光器械的类型可能会导致牙根表面特征存在显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/df3899a1f532/healthcare-08-00055-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/68abb58d8610/healthcare-08-00055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/39fe4a65db7b/healthcare-08-00055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/c9d58d1b360c/healthcare-08-00055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/4e2098c7edb6/healthcare-08-00055-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/e19417b6928a/healthcare-08-00055-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/df3899a1f532/healthcare-08-00055-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/68abb58d8610/healthcare-08-00055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/39fe4a65db7b/healthcare-08-00055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/c9d58d1b360c/healthcare-08-00055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/4e2098c7edb6/healthcare-08-00055-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/e19417b6928a/healthcare-08-00055-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b07/7151259/df3899a1f532/healthcare-08-00055-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study.不同超声洁牙器和抛光设备作用于人体牙齿导致的牙根表面磨损及粗糙度比较:一项体外研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 7;8(1):55. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010055.
2
Effects of a new magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler and a traditional piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler on root surfaces and patient complaints.新型磁致伸缩超声洁牙机和传统压电超声洁牙机对根面及患者舒适度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57037-7.
3
Surface roughness of enamel and root surface after scaling, root planning and polishing procedures: An in-vitro study.洁治、根面平整和抛光术后牙釉质及牙根表面粗糙度:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;11(2):287-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
4
The effect of various ultrasonic and hand instruments on the root surfaces of human single rooted teeth: A Planimetric and Profilometric study.各种超声器械和手动器械对人单根牙牙根表面的影响:一项平面测量和轮廓测量研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):710-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.147405.
5
Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.不同工作参数下的压电超声洁牙手机头磨损对根面粗糙度的影响:一种轮廓仪和原子力显微镜研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 Feb;11(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/idh.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
6
Comparison of root surface roughness produced by air polishing combined with hand instrumentation or ultrasonic instrumentation: an in vitro study.空气抛光联合手动器械或超声器械产生的根面粗糙度比较:一项体外研究。
Gen Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):75-77.
7
Cleaning and polishing efficacy of abrasive-bristle brushes and a prophylaxis paste on resin composite material in vitro.体外研究中,磨料刷毛牙刷与预防用糊剂对树脂复合材料的清洁和抛光效果。
Quintessence Int. 2002 Oct;33(9):691-9.
8
Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.应用共聚焦显微镜和扫描电子显微镜评估四种根管预备器械系统对根管表面微观形貌的影响:一项体外研究。
J Periodontal Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):608-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01473.x. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
9
Profilometric analysis of root surfaces after using various polishing agents.使用各种抛光剂后牙根表面的轮廓测定分析。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):22-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.168485.
10
The Effect of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler Tip Wear on Root Surface Roughness at Different Working Parameters: An Atomic Force Microscopic and Profilometric Study.不同工作参数下压电超声洁治器尖端磨损对牙根表面粗糙度的影响:一项原子力显微镜和轮廓仪研究
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2017 Jan 2;19(1):15-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Root surface roughness evaluation following application of different periodontal instruments and Er:YAG laser: A profilometry and SEM study.不同牙周器械和 Er:YAG 激光应用后根面粗糙度评价:轮廓测量和 SEM 研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Apr 7;39(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04025-y.
2
Effects of a new magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler and a traditional piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler on root surfaces and patient complaints.新型磁致伸缩超声洁牙机和传统压电超声洁牙机对根面及患者舒适度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57037-7.
3
Assessing the effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler tip wear on root surface roughness under influence of various working parameters: A profilometric and atomic force microscopic study.

本文引用的文献

1
Interferon Crevicular Fluid Profile and Correlation with Periodontal Disease and Wound Healing: A Systemic Review of Recent Data.龈沟液中干扰素的分布特征及其与牙周病和伤口愈合的相关性:对近期数据的系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 29;19(7):1908. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071908.
2
Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.手工和机械洁治后的牙根表面改变:一项对比研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 Nov;16(4):553-558. doi: 10.1111/idh.12349. Epub 2018 May 25.
3
Efficiency of three different polishing methods on enamel and cementum: A scanning electron microscope study.
评估在各种工作参数影响下压电超声洁治器尖端磨损对牙根表面粗糙度的影响:一项轮廓测量和原子力显微镜研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(6):583-589. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_416_22. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study.手工器械和超声洁牙器产生的根面粗糙度评估:一项体内研究。
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2022 Nov 6;14(2):84-88. doi: 10.34172/japid.2022.022. eCollection 2022.
5
Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial.通过比较当代牙锉和传统牙锉分析根面粗糙度和玷污层的关系:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02268-1.
6
The Effect of Ultrasonic Scaling and Air-Powder Polishing on the Roughness of the Enamel, Three Different Nanocomposites, and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces.超声洁治和喷粉抛光对牙釉质、三种不同纳米复合材料以及复合材料/牙釉质和复合材料/牙骨质界面粗糙度的影响
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;11(11):3072. doi: 10.3390/nano11113072.
三种不同抛光方法对牙釉质和牙骨质的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):18-24. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_40_17.
4
Removal of simulated biofilm: an evaluation of the effect on root surfaces roughness after scaling.去除模拟生物膜:对根面粗糙度在荡洗后的影响评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1021-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1861-9. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Microscopic view of scaling influence on the root, using different power and time settings.使用不同功率和时间设置时,洁治对牙根影响的显微镜视图。
Quintessence Int. 2016;47(7):559-68. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a36094.
6
Profilometric analysis of root surfaces after using various polishing agents.使用各种抛光剂后牙根表面的轮廓测定分析。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):22-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.168485.
7
Comparison of Root Surface Roughness Produced By Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scalers: An Invitro Study.手工器械与超声洁牙机产生的根面粗糙度比较:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):ZC56-60. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13744.6828. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
8
The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.压电超声洁治器的器械操作角度对牙根表面的影响。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):184-90. doi: 10.1111/idh.12134. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
9
Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.使用新型压电装置进行根管预备后牙根表面的组织学和轮廓测量评估——离体研究
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 May;13(2):138-44. doi: 10.1111/idh.12091. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between hand instrument, ultrasonic scaling and erbium doped:Yttirum aluminum garnet laser on root surface: A morphological and thermal analysis.手持器械、超声洁治与掺铒钇铝石榴石激光对牙根表面影响的比较扫描电子显微镜研究:形态学与热分析
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Apr;4(2):198-205. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.114881.