Substantive-Methodological Synergy Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
J Sports Sci. 2020 Apr;38(8):897-909. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1736765. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
While previous studies highlighted the importance of the different motivations for doing sports as proposed by self-determination theory, less emphasis has been put on the simultaneous presence of multiple motivations within the same individual. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the complex interaction of sport motivations and to identify core (common) and peripheral (uncommon) profiles of people engaged in sports based on a combination of motivations. To achieve this goal, latent profile analysis, a person-centered approach, was performed on responses from 506 participants engaged in sports. For better understanding the extracted profiles, basic psychological need fulfillment was included as profile predictor, while subjective vitality and various engagement-related indicators as outcomes. Four core and peripheral profiles were identified: Moderately Motivated, Highly Motivated, Amotivated, and Poorly Motivated. Contrary to theory, introjected regulation clustered more closely with self-determined motivations. Profile membership was significantly predicted by global need fulfillment, autonomy satisfaction as well as, to a smaller extent, autonomy, relatedness, and competence frustration. The four profiles differed along vitality and some, but not all, engagement-related outcomes.
虽然先前的研究强调了自我决定理论所提出的不同运动动机的重要性,但对于同一个体中同时存在多种动机的情况关注较少。因此,本研究旨在调查运动动机的复杂相互作用,并根据动机的组合来确定参与运动的个体的核心(共同)和外围(不常见)特征。为了实现这一目标,对 506 名参与运动的个体的反应进行了潜在剖面分析,这是一种基于个体的方法。为了更好地理解提取的特征,将基本心理需求的满足作为特征预测因素,而主观活力和各种与参与相关的指标作为结果。确定了四个核心和外围特征:适度激励、高度激励、无激励和激励不足。与理论相反,内摄调节与自我决定的动机更为密切相关。特征成员身份与整体需求满足、自主性满足以及在较小程度上与自主性、关联性和能力受挫显著相关。这四个特征在活力和一些但不是所有与参与相关的结果方面存在差异。