Suppr超能文献

听力植入物的可靠性:关于耳蜗植入失败的类型和发生率的报告。

The reliability of hearing implants: report on the type and incidence of cochlear implant failures.

机构信息

Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Ear Science Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.

出版信息

Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Jul;21(4):228-237. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1735678. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Abstract

This study presents the data collected through a database on the type and incidence of cochlear implant device failures and major complications and quantifies the risk of failures across time based on the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) CI86:2017 standard. Information on reliability of MED-EL cochlear implants was collected from the MED-EL complaint database between 2003 and2013. Explants were categorized and device reliability was calculated according to the AAMI CI86:2017 standard principles. Data were collected for 11662 devices (5462 children, 6200 adults). The mean duration of follow up was 46.16 months. The total failure rate for all devices and all subjects was 2.41%. Medical related explants (MRE) were significantly worse for children than for adults with the ceramic implants, C40+ ( = 0.008) and PULSAR ( = 0.020). Device failure explants (DFE) were significantly worse for children than for adults with all four devices in the study, the C40+ ( < 0.001), PULSAR ( < 0.001), SONATA ( < 0.001), and CONCERTO ( = 0.023). The mean annual failure rate for all subjects and devices was 0.63% (1.03% for children, 0.28% for adults). The mean annual failure rate was 0.90% for the C40+; 0.57% for the PULSAR; 0.46% for the SONATA; and 0.39% for the CONCERTO. Compared to adults, children had significantly worse MRE and DFE due to a higher risk of head trauma and more vulnerable skull anatomy. Further, the authors conclude that the AAMI standard will ensure a more comprehensive and transparent evaluation of cochlear implant reliability in the future.

摘要

本研究通过一个关于耳蜗植入设备故障类型和发生率以及主要并发症的数据库收集数据,并根据医疗仪器促进协会(AAMI)CI86:2017 标准量化了随时间推移的故障风险。2003 年至 2013 年间,从 MED-EL 投诉数据库中收集了有关 MED-EL 耳蜗植入物可靠性的信息。根据 AAMI CI86:2017 标准原则对取出物进行分类,并计算设备可靠性。共收集了 11662 个设备(5462 名儿童,6200 名成人)的数据。平均随访时间为 46.16 个月。所有设备和所有受试者的总故障率为 2.41%。与成人相比,陶瓷植入物 C40+( = 0.008)和 PULSAR( = 0.020)的儿童医疗器械相关取出物(MRE)明显更差。与所有研究中的四个设备相比,儿童的设备故障取出物(DFE)明显更差,C40+( < 0.001)、PULSAR( < 0.001)、SONATA( < 0.001)和 CONCERTO( = 0.023)。所有受试者和设备的平均年故障率为 0.63%(儿童为 1.03%,成人 0.28%)。C40+的平均年故障率为 0.90%;PULSAR 为 0.57%;SONATA 为 0.46%;CONCERTO 为 0.39%。与成人相比,儿童的 MRE 和 DFE 更差,因为他们头部受伤的风险更高,颅骨结构更脆弱。此外,作者得出结论,AAMI 标准将确保未来对耳蜗植入物可靠性进行更全面和透明的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验