Suppr超能文献

血糖状况与房颤患者的血栓栓塞和大出血风险。

Glycemic status and risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

The Cardiovascular Department, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, 33305, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Mar 10;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01005-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies specifically examining the association between glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism (IS/SE) risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are limited. Here, we investigated the association between HbA1c levels and the risk of IS/SE, as well as major bleeding, among AF patients with or without oral anticoagulants (OACs). We also compared the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in different HbA1c categories.

METHODS

We utilized medical data from a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan, which included 34,036 AF patients with serum HbA1c data available within 3 months after AF being diagnosed. Patients were divided into seven study groups according to their HbA1c levels: < 5.4%, 5.4%-5.6%, 5.7%-5.9%, 6.0%-6.4%, 6.5%-6.9%, 7.0%-7.9%, and ≥ 8.0%. The risks of IS/SE and major bleeding were compared among the groups after adjusting for baseline stroke and bleeding risk factors.

RESULTS

Compared with the patients with HbA1c level < 5.4%, IS/SE risk significantly increased at HbA1c levels higher than 6.5% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.43 for HbA1c level 6.5%-6.9%; 1.32, (95% CI 1.11-1.57) for HbA1c level 7.0%-7.9%; and 1.48 (95% CI 1.25-1.76) for HbA1c level ≥ 8.0%]. These results were generally consistent in AF patients without OACs (n = 24,931). However, among 9105 patients receiving OACs, IS/SE risk was not higher for patients having higher HbA1c levels. The risk of major bleeding was comparable across all HbA1c categories. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with lower risks of IS/SE (adjusted HR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75) and major bleeding (adjusted HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.21-0.42) without interactions across different HbA1c categories (all P interactions > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For AF patients, IS/SE risk significantly increased once HbA1c levels exceeded 6.5%, and OACs may attenuate these associations. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were more effective and safer across broad HbA1c categories. Therefore, in addition to prescribing DOACs when indicated, more aggressive glycemic control to achieve an HbA1c level < 6.5% may be considered for eligible AF patients and should be tested in further prospective studies.

摘要

背景

专门研究糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平与房颤(AF)患者缺血性卒中/全身性血栓栓塞(IS/SE)风险之间关联的研究有限。在这里,我们研究了 HbA1c 水平与 AF 患者无论是否使用口服抗凝剂(OACs)的 IS/SE 风险以及大出血之间的关联。我们还比较了华法林和直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在不同 HbA1c 类别中的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们利用了来自台湾一家多中心医疗机构的医疗数据,其中包括 34036 名在诊断为 AF 后 3 个月内有血清 HbA1c 数据的 AF 患者。患者根据 HbA1c 水平分为七个研究组:<5.4%、5.4%-5.6%、5.7%-5.9%、6.0%-6.4%、6.5%-6.9%、7.0%-7.9%和≥8.0%。在调整了基线卒中风险和出血风险因素后,比较了各组之间的 IS/SE 和大出血风险。

结果

与 HbA1c 水平<5.4%的患者相比,HbA1c 水平高于 6.5%时,IS/SE 风险显著增加[校正后的危险比(HR):HbA1c 水平 6.5%-6.9%为 1.20(95%置信区间(CI):1.00-1.43);HbA1c 水平 7.0%-7.9%为 1.32(95% CI 1.11-1.57);HbA1c 水平≥8.0%为 1.48(95% CI 1.25-1.76)]。在没有 OACs 的 AF 患者(n=24931)中,这些结果基本一致。然而,在 9105 名接受 OACs 的患者中,HbA1c 水平较高的患者发生 IS/SE 的风险并没有增加。所有 HbA1c 类别之间的大出血风险相当。与华法林相比,DOACs 与较低的 IS/SE 风险(校正后的 HR:0.61,95% CI 0.49-0.75)和大出血风险(校正后的 HR:0.30,95% CI 0.21-0.42)相关,并且在不同的 HbA1c 类别之间没有交互作用(所有 P 交互值>0.05)。

结论

对于 AF 患者,一旦 HbA1c 水平超过 6.5%,IS/SE 风险显著增加,OACs 可能会减弱这些关联。与华法林相比,DOACs 在广泛的 HbA1c 类别中更有效且更安全。因此,除了在有指征时开 DOACs 外,对于符合条件的 AF 患者,还可以考虑更积极的血糖控制以达到 HbA1c 水平<6.5%,并应在进一步的前瞻性研究中进行检验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d01/7063754/974a1e2cf821/12933_2020_1005_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验