• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据温哥华分类,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨柄假体周围股骨近端骨折:一种新骨折模式的观察。

Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in cemented and uncemented stems according to Vancouver classification: observation of a new fracture pattern.

机构信息

Gosford District Hospital, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 10;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01619-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-020-01619-4
PMID:32156300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063746/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures are increasingly encountered in hip arthroplasty. The Vancouver classification system is widely used. Little knowledge exists regarding the association of the Vancouver classification with either cemented or uncemented stems. The aim was to analyse a series of fractures and determine associations.

METHODS

A series of consecutive patients over 8 years was identified including only post-operative fractures of primary hip arthroplasties. Baseline and radiographic characteristics were recorded including the type of stem fixation (cemented or uncemented) and Vancouver classification. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association of the Vancouver classification between cemented and uncemented stems.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were identified (84 cemented stems, 88 uncemented stems). There were 30 Vancouver A fractures (12 cemented vs.18 uncemented, p > 0.05), 125 Vancouver B fractures (63 cemented vs. 62 uncemented, p > 0.05) and 17 Vancouver C fractures (9 cemented vs. 8 uncemented, p > 0.05). The Vancouver B2 fracture occurred most frequently (N = 95; 44 cemented vs. 51 uncemented, p > 0.05) and consists of four distinct fracture patterns: the previously described comminuted 'burst', clamshell and spiral patterns and the newly observed 'reverse' clamshell. The burst and spiral fracture patterns are significantly associated with cemented stems, and the clamshell pattern is significantly associated with uncemented stems.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancouver A, B and C fractures occur equally in cemented and uncemented stems. Awareness of four distinct Vancouver B2 fracture patterns, including the newly observed reverse clamshell, will aid surgeons in predicting stem instability.

摘要

背景

在髋关节置换术中,越来越多地遇到假体周围骨折。温哥华分类系统被广泛应用。关于温哥华分类系统与骨水泥固定或非骨水泥固定柄之间的关系,我们知之甚少。目的是分析一系列骨折并确定相关性。

方法

确定了 8 年来连续的一系列患者,仅包括初次髋关节置换术后的术后骨折。记录了基线和影像学特征,包括柄固定类型(骨水泥固定或非骨水泥固定)和温哥华分类。进行了统计分析以确定温哥华分类系统在骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定柄之间的相关性。

结果

共确定了 172 名患者(84 个骨水泥固定柄,88 个非骨水泥固定柄)。有 30 个温哥华 A 型骨折(12 个骨水泥固定 vs. 18 个非骨水泥固定,p > 0.05),125 个温哥华 B 型骨折(63 个骨水泥固定 vs. 62 个非骨水泥固定,p > 0.05)和 17 个温哥华 C 型骨折(9 个骨水泥固定 vs. 8 个非骨水泥固定,p > 0.05)。温哥华 B2 型骨折最常见(N = 95;44 个骨水泥固定 vs. 51 个非骨水泥固定,p > 0.05),由四个不同的骨折模式组成:以前描述的粉碎性“爆裂”、蛤壳和螺旋模式,以及新观察到的“反向”蛤壳模式。爆裂和螺旋骨折模式与骨水泥固定柄显著相关,蛤壳模式与非骨水泥固定柄显著相关。

结论

骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定柄中发生温哥华 A、B 和 C 型骨折的频率相同。认识到四个不同的温哥华 B2 型骨折模式,包括新观察到的反向蛤壳,将有助于外科医生预测柄的不稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/86cb55fc70af/13018_2020_1619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/bae85e77bccf/13018_2020_1619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/634c56e4eeb6/13018_2020_1619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/86cb55fc70af/13018_2020_1619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/bae85e77bccf/13018_2020_1619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/634c56e4eeb6/13018_2020_1619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18a5/7063746/86cb55fc70af/13018_2020_1619_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in cemented and uncemented stems according to Vancouver classification: observation of a new fracture pattern.根据温哥华分类,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨柄假体周围股骨近端骨折:一种新骨折模式的观察。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 10;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01619-4.
2
Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.5417例翻修全髋关节置换术中假体周围股骨骨折的流行病学:40年经验
Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):468-74. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37203.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.《骨水泥型股骨假体周围骨折的温哥华分类的可靠性和有效性》。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S277-S281. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.062. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Cemented vs cementless stems for revision arthroplasties due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体治疗 Vancouver B2 型髋关节假体周围骨折翻修术的比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2573-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03961-3. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems.《绝命毒师》:骨水泥型与非骨水泥型股骨柄周围假体周围骨折的对比描述性分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1783-1786. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Comparative outcomes of uncemented and cemented stem revision in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study.非骨水泥型和骨水泥型翻修治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jul 18;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00777-z.
7
Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.不同柄几何形状周围柄假体周围髋部骨折的发生率和模式。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):53-59. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04336-8. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.32644例初次全髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折的流行病学:40年经验
Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):461-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201.
9
Higher periprosthetic fracture rate associated with use of modern uncemented stems compared to cemented stems in femoral neck fractures.与骨水泥型股骨柄相比,现代非骨水泥型股骨柄用于股骨颈骨折时假体周围骨折发生率更高。
Hip Int. 2019 Mar;29(2):177-183. doi: 10.1177/1120700018772291. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
10
Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型髋关节柄周围股骨骨折的骨折负荷:一项体外实验研究。
Orthopedics. 2008 Jul;31(7):653.

引用本文的文献

1
Which B2 Fractures Can Be Treated with ORIF? Validation of the "Beyond the Vancouver Classification".哪些B2型骨折可以采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗?“超越温哥华分类法”的验证
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 24;61(7):1138. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071138.
2
Management of Clamshell Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Rarely Recognized Periprosthetic Injury Pattern.全髋关节置换术中蛤壳样骨折的处理:一种罕见的假体周围损伤模式。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 10;14(14):4896. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144896.
3
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Periprosthetic Fractures Between Cemented vs Cementless Stem Methods After Initial Total Hip Arthroplasty or Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis (TRON Study).

本文引用的文献

1
Computed tomography for managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis.计算机断层扫描在股骨假体周围骨折治疗中的应用。回顾性分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 29;20(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2632-y.
2
Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.不同柄几何形状周围柄假体周围髋部骨折的发生率和模式。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):53-59. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04336-8. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems.
初次全髋关节置换术或双极半髋关节置换术后骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体柄方法治疗假体周围骨折的临床结果比较:一项多中心分析(TRON研究)
Arthroplast Today. 2025 May 7;33:101699. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101699. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The Role of Osteoporosis in Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fractures and Current Management Strategies: a Review.骨质疏松在全髋关节置换术假体周围骨折中的作用及当前管理策略:综述
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2025 Jun 23;23(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s11914-025-00922-5.
5
Open reduction and internal fixation offers lower hip-related complications compared to stem revision in Vancouver B2 fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems.对于围绕骨水泥型抛光锥形股骨干的温哥华B2型骨折,与翻修柄相比,切开复位内固定术的髋关节相关并发症发生率更低。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 13;12(1):e70179. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70179. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Comparative outcomes of uncemented and cemented stem revision in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study.非骨水泥型和骨水泥型翻修治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jul 18;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00777-z.
7
The History of Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Literature Review.人工关节周围股骨骨折分类系统的历史:文献综述
Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1816-1831. doi: 10.1111/os.14149. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
8
Revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture: epidemiology, outcomes, and factors associated with success.人工关节周围骨折的翻修全髋关节置换术:流行病学、结果及与成功相关的因素。
Ann Jt. 2023 Jul 10;8:30. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-16. eCollection 2023.
9
Optimizing periprosthetic fracture management and in-hospital outcome: insights from the PIPPAS multicentric study of 1387 cases in Spain.优化假体周围骨折的管理和院内转归:来自西班牙 1387 例 PIPPAS 多中心研究的见解。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Mar 7;25(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00746-6.
10
Exploring Individualized Approaches to Managing Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Insights from a Comprehensive Case Series Analysis.探索温哥华B型人工关节周围股骨骨折的个体化治疗方法:综合病例系列分析的见解
Cureus. 2024 Jan 31;16(1):e53269. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53269. eCollection 2024 Jan.
《绝命毒师》:骨水泥型与非骨水泥型股骨柄周围假体周围骨折的对比描述性分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1783-1786. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
Vancouver B2 Peri-Prosthetic Fractures in Cemented Femoral Implants can be Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Alone Without Revision.温哥华 B2 型骨水泥型股骨假体周围骨折可通过切开复位内固定单独治疗,无需翻修。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1430-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
5
Cumulative Long-Term Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Hip Stem: 26- to 32-Year Results.使用非骨水泥锥形钛合金髋关节柄的累积长期术后股骨假体周围骨折发生率:26 至 32 年的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
6
Incidence and demographics of 1751 surgically treated periprosthetic femoral fractures around a primary hip prosthesis.1751例围绕初次髋关节假体的人工关节周围股骨骨折的手术治疗发生率及人口统计学特征
Hip Int. 2019 May;29(3):282-288. doi: 10.1177/1120700018779558. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
7
Higher periprosthetic fracture rate associated with use of modern uncemented stems compared to cemented stems in femoral neck fractures.与骨水泥型股骨柄相比,现代非骨水泥型股骨柄用于股骨颈骨折时假体周围骨折发生率更高。
Hip Int. 2019 Mar;29(2):177-183. doi: 10.1177/1120700018772291. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.温哥华B2型人工关节周围股骨骨折:柄部翻修术与钢板内固定术的对比研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1133-1142. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2181-3. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component.采用近端涂层双锥形非骨水泥股骨假体进行初次全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的危险因素。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):451-457. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0266.R2.
10
A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.温哥华B2型和B3型人工关节周围股骨骨折的系统评价
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4 Supple B):17-25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1.