Geriatric Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Sciences of Aging, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jun 18;75(7):1324-1330. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa063.
A universal definition of sarcopenia is still lacking. Since the European criteria have been recently revised, we aimed at studying prevalence of low muscle strength (LMS) and low muscle mass (LMM), as defined according to the European Working Group of Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) 2 and 1 definitions, and their individual contribution toward mortality and incident mobility disability in a cohort of community-dwelling older people.
Longitudinal analysis of 535 participants of the InCHIANTI study. LMS and LMM were defined according to the criteria indicated in the EWGSOP2 and 1. Cox and log-binomial regressions were used to examine association with mortality and 3-year mobility disability (inability to walk 400 m).
We observed a lower prevalence of the combination LMM/LMS according to EWGSOP2 compared to EWGSOP1 (3.2% vs 6.2%). Using the new criteria, all sarcopenia components were associated with mortality, although the hazard ratio [HR] for the group LMM/LMS was no longer significant after adjustment for confounders (LMM: HR 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.94; LMS: HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.44-7.01; LMM/LMS: HR 2.95, 95% CI 0.86-10.16). Using EWGSOP1, LMS alone was independently associated with mortality (HR 4.43, 95% CI 1.85-10.57). None of the sarcopenia components conferred a higher risk of mobility disability.
The EWGSOP2 algorithm leads to a reduction in the estimated prevalence of sarcopenia defined as combination of LMM/LMS. The finding that, independent of the adopted criteria, people with LMS and normal mass have a higher mortality risk compared to robust individuals, confirms that evaluation of muscle strength has a central role for prognosis evaluation.
目前仍缺乏肌少症的通用定义。由于欧洲标准最近已被修订,我们旨在根据欧洲老年人肌少症工作组(EWGSOP)2 及 1 定义研究低肌肉力量(LMS)和低肌肉量(LMM)的流行率,以及它们对社区居住的老年人死亡率和新发移动障碍的个体贡献。
对 InCHIANTI 研究的 535 名参与者进行纵向分析。根据 EWGSOP2 中的标准定义 LMS 和 LMM。使用 Cox 和对数二项回归检验与死亡率和 3 年移动障碍(无法行走 400 米)的关联。
与 EWGSOP1 相比,根据 EWGSOP2 观察到 LMM/LMS 组合的患病率较低(3.2% vs 6.2%)。使用新的标准,所有肌少症成分均与死亡率相关,尽管在调整混杂因素后,LMM/LMS 组的危险比(HR)不再显著(LMM:HR 2.69,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.04-6.94;LMS:HR 3.18,95% CI 1.44-7.01;LMM/LMS:HR 2.95,95% CI 0.86-10.16)。使用 EWGSOP1,仅 LMS 与死亡率独立相关(HR 4.43,95% CI 1.85-10.57)。肌少症成分均未增加移动障碍的风险。
EWGSOP2 算法可降低 LMM/LMS 组合定义的肌少症的估计患病率。无论采用何种标准,与健壮个体相比,LMS 和正常质量的人死亡率更高的发现,证实了肌肉力量评估在预后评估中具有核心作用。