Ryan J J, Farage C M, Mittenberg W, Kasprisin A
Leavenworth Veterans Administration Medical Center, Kansas 66048.
Int J Neurosci. 1988 Nov;43(1-2):75-80. doi: 10.3109/00207458808985782.
The language scales of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) were administered to patients classified as either Broca's (n = 7) or Wernicke's (n = 7) aphasics. Group comparisons were made on the standard scales (e.g., Receptive Speech, Expressive Speech, Reading & Writing) and on 13 factor-analytically derived subscales (McKay & Golden, 1981). Results indicated that the standard T-score profile failed to discriminate the distinctively different language syndromes. Only two of the 13 factor scales differentiated the groups. Although Wernicke's patients were more impaired than Broca's patients on factor-analytically derived measures of basic language comprehension, it was concluded that the subscales added little to the standard profile in terms of aphasia syndrome identification. Distinctively different profiles of impaired and retained language abilities did not emerge on the LNNB factor scales. The battery cannot be recommended for use with aphasic patients.
对被归类为布罗卡失语症（n = 7）或韦尼克失语症（n = 7）的患者进行了鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验（LNNB）的语言量表测试。对标准量表（如接受性言语、表达性言语、阅读与写作）以及13个通过因素分析得出的分量表（麦凯和戈尔登，1981年）进行了组间比较。结果表明，标准T分数剖面图未能区分明显不同的语言综合征。13个因素量表中只有两个区分了这两组。尽管在通过因素分析得出的基本语言理解测量中，韦尼克失语症患者比布罗卡失语症患者受损更严重，但得出的结论是，就失语症综合征识别而言，这些分量表对标准剖面图的补充作用不大。在LNNB因素量表上，并未出现受损和保留语言能力的明显不同剖面图。不推荐将该成套测验用于失语症患者。
