Malta Romeiras Francisco
Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ann Sci. 2020 Jan;77(1):71-95. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2020.1714295. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the Inquisition was the institution most invested in the censorship of printed books in the Portuguese empire. Besides publishing the , the Holy Office was also responsible for overseeing their implementation and ensuring their efficacy in preventing the importation, reading, and circulation of banned books. Overall, the sixteenth-century condemned 785 authors and 1081 titles, including 52 authors and 85 titles of medicine, natural history, natural philosophy, astronomy, chronology, cosmography, astrology, and divinatory arts. By looking at the largest collection of early modern scientific books in Portugal, I will argue that a closer inspection of marginalia and ownership, and the establishment of a typology of expurgations is essential for the comprehension of the actual practices and the mechanisms of censorship. By examining the material evidence of censorship, in order to reconstruct expurgation practices, this paper reveals the processes and effectiveness of ecclesiastical control in the Portuguese Inquisition and highlights the differences between what inquisitors wrote in the and what others put into practice.
在16和17世纪,宗教裁判所是葡萄牙帝国中对印刷书籍审查投入最多的机构。除了发布禁书目录外,宗教法庭还负责监督这些目录的执行情况,并确保其在防止禁书进口、阅读和流通方面的有效性。总体而言,16世纪宗教裁判所谴责了785位作者和1081个书名,其中包括52位医学、自然史、自然哲学、天文学、年代学、宇宙志、占星术和占卜术领域的作者及85个书名。通过研究葡萄牙最大的早期现代科学书籍收藏,我认为更仔细地检查旁注和所有权,并建立一种删改类型学,对于理解实际审查做法和审查机制至关重要。通过审视审查的实物证据以重建删改做法,本文揭示了葡萄牙宗教裁判所中教会控制的过程和效果,并突出了宗教裁判所在禁书目录中所写内容与其他人实际执行情况之间的差异。