Ribeiro Luís Campos
Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ann Sci. 2020 Jan;77(1):50-70. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2020.1714297. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
This paper explores the rules for the expurgation of texts of astrology in the Iberian Indices of forbidden books. It addresses the prohibitions put forward in Rule IX of the Index of Trent and the bull of Sixtus V, and studies its impact on the rules and their interpretation in the Spanish and Portuguese Indices, in particular, those published in the first decades of the seventeenth century: the Spanish of 1612 and the Portuguese of 1624. It shows how these indices offer a more meticulous examination of the prohibitions providing not only more detail regarding the different practices of astrology, but also explicitly accept the doctrine of inclinations of Thomas Aquinas as a central rule to deal with astrological judgments on human behaviour. It also highlights some specific details of the practice of censorship of astrological books by examining case studies of censored Portuguese and Spanish astrological publications. These provide new dimensions and highlight significant differences between the theoretical rules, practical guidelines, and actual restriction of astrological content.
本文探讨了伊比利亚禁书索引中占星术文本的删节规则。它论述了《特伦特索引》第九条规则和西克斯图斯五世诏书提出的禁令,并研究了其对西班牙和葡萄牙索引中规则及其解释的影响,特别是17世纪头几十年出版的索引:1612年的西班牙索引和1624年的葡萄牙索引。它展示了这些索引如何对禁令进行更细致的审查,不仅提供了关于占星术不同实践的更多细节,还明确接受托马斯·阿奎那的倾向学说,将其作为处理关于人类行为的占星判断的核心规则。通过审查被审查的葡萄牙和西班牙占星出版物的案例研究,它还突出了占星书籍审查实践的一些具体细节。这些案例提供了新的维度,并凸显了理论规则、实践指南与占星内容实际限制之间的显著差异。