Alikhani Armaghan, Babaahmadi Maryam, Etemadi Najme
Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Dentist, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Mar;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77830.
The most common cause of endodontic treatment failures is improper coronal sealing. Therefore, besides to proper root sealing, coronal sealing which is supported by a proper restoration has a major role in endodontic treatment success, and coronal microleakage should be considered as an etiologic factor in endodontic treatment failure. Glass-ionomer (GI) has been proposed as a coronal barrier for microleakage after endodontic treatment.
This study aimed to evaluate the coronal microleakage in GI-obturated root canals in endodontically treated teeth using different thicknesses of GI.
In this in vitro study, forty-five single-rooted extracted human teeth with single canals were collected and disinfected with 0.5% chloramine solution. After endodontic treatment, teeth were divided into 3 groups. In the group 1 to 3, 1 to 3mm of gutta-percha was removed and GI was replaced at 1-, 2- and 3-mm thicknesses respectively. Then subgroups were placed in methylene blue dye and the microleakage was assessed using dye penetration.
The mean dye penetration in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 5.1, 3.7 and 2.9, respectively, with statistically significant differences. Group 1 exhibited the highest amount of dye penetration while group 3 showed the least one. Moreover, a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (= 0.002) and a non-significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (= 0.098) was detected in mean dye penetration.
Thicker layers of GI might decrease the coronal microleakage. GI at 3-mm thickness resulted in the best protective effect on coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth, though further studies are needed to confirm these results.
牙髓治疗失败的最常见原因是冠部封闭不当。因此,除了适当的根管封闭外,由适当修复体支持的冠部封闭在牙髓治疗成功中起着重要作用,并且冠部微渗漏应被视为牙髓治疗失败的一个病因。玻璃离子水门汀(GI)已被提议作为牙髓治疗后冠部微渗漏的屏障。
本研究旨在评估使用不同厚度的GI封闭根管的牙髓治疗后牙齿的冠部微渗漏情况。
在这项体外研究中,收集了45颗单根管的离体人牙,并用0.5%氯胺溶液进行消毒。牙髓治疗后,将牙齿分为3组。在第1组至第3组中,分别去除1至3毫米的牙胶并用厚度为1毫米、2毫米和3毫米的GI进行替换。然后将各亚组置于亚甲蓝染料中,并使用染料渗透法评估微渗漏情况。
第1组、第2组和第3组的平均染料渗透深度分别为5.1、3.7和2.9,差异具有统计学意义。第1组的染料渗透量最高,而第3组最少。此外,在平均染料渗透深度方面,第1组和第2组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.002),第2组和第3组之间无显著差异(P = 0.098)。
较厚的GI层可能会减少冠部微渗漏。3毫米厚的GI对牙髓治疗后牙齿的冠部微渗漏具有最佳保护作用,不过需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。