• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种根管口封闭材料冠部微渗漏的体外比较

An in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three orifice barriers filling materials.

作者信息

Yavari Hamidreza, Samiei Mohammad, Eskandarinezhad Mahsa, Shahi Shahriar, Aghazadeh Marzieh, Pasvey Yones

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2012 Summer;7(3):156-60. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

PMID:23056136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3467145/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A coronal barrier in root-filled teeth is one of the most effective methods for prevention of coronal microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare coronal microleakage of three materials [light-cured glass-ionomer (GI), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and composite resin] as coronal barriers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 188 intact maxillary incisors were used. After instrumentation, all the canals were obturated with gutta-percha and lateral condensation technique using AH26 sealer. Then, the teeth were sectioned just apical to the cemento-enamel junction. The roots were randomly assigned to three experimental groups (n=56) and two negative and positive control groups (n=20). After placing the orifice barrier, the samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 2 weeks at 37°C. Then the teeth were longitudinally sectioned mesiodistally and dye penetration was measured under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Tukey test.

RESULTS

The positive control group leaked significantly more than all the experimental groups (P=0.001). MTA exhibited less leakage than composite and GI (P=0.002) but no significant differences were found between GI and composite groups.

CONCLUSION

Immediate placement of a suitable intra-orifice barrier like MTA, before final restoration, may help minimize recontamination of the remaining apical gutta-percha.

摘要

引言

在根管充填的牙齿中设置冠部屏障是预防冠部微渗漏最有效的方法之一。本研究的目的是比较三种材料[光固化玻璃离子水门汀(GI)、三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)和复合树脂]作为冠部屏障时的冠部微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

共使用188颗完整的上颌切牙。根管预备后,所有根管均采用AH26封闭剂,通过牙胶尖侧向加压充填技术进行充填。然后,在牙骨质-釉质界根尖方将牙齿截断。将牙根随机分为三个试验组(n = 56)以及两个阴性和阳性对照组(n = 20)。放置根管口屏障后,将样本置于37°C的2%亚甲蓝溶液中浸泡2周。然后将牙齿沿近远中方向纵切,在体视显微镜下以×10放大倍数测量染料渗透情况。数据采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行分析。

结果

阳性对照组的渗漏明显多于所有试验组(P = 0.001)。MTA的渗漏比复合树脂和GI少(P = 0.002),但GI组和复合树脂组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

在最终修复前立即放置合适的根管口屏障,如MTA,可能有助于减少剩余根尖牙胶尖的再污染。

相似文献

1
An in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three orifice barriers filling materials.三种根管口封闭材料冠部微渗漏的体外比较
Iran Endod J. 2012 Summer;7(3):156-60. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
2
Microleakage of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-Enriched Mixture Cement and Biodentine Intra-Orifice Barriers.三氧化矿物凝聚体、富钙混合水泥和生物陶瓷根管口封闭材料的微渗漏
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):211-215. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.41.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of New MTA Based Sealers with Conventional Resin Based Sealer: An In-vitro Study.新型基于MTA的封闭剂与传统树脂基封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC76-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18909.8194. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Comparison of coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin-modified glass ionomer, and mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontically treated teeth: An study.根管治疗后牙齿中可流动复合树脂、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和三氧化矿物凝聚体的冠部封闭效果比较:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Feb 22;21:13. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation of coronal microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate plug-in teeth with short roots prepared for post placement using bacterial penetration technique.使用细菌渗透技术对准备进行桩置入的短根牙齿中矿物三氧化物聚合体充填物的冠部微渗漏进行评估。
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 May-Jun;27(3):295-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.186233.
6
Coronal and apical sealing ability of a new endodontic cement.一种新型根管充填水门汀的冠方及根尖封闭能力
Iran Endod J. 2009 Winter;4(1):15-9. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
7
Microleakage comparison of glass-ionomer and white mineral trioxide aggregate used as a coronal barrier in nonvital bleaching.玻璃离子体和白色矿化三氧化物聚合体作为非活力漂白的冠部屏障的微渗漏比较。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Nov 1;16(7):e1017-21. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17306.
8
Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cements, and Composite as a Coronal Barrier: An in vitro Microbiological Study.矿物三氧化物凝聚体、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合树脂作为冠部屏障的评估:一项体外微生物学研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):292-295.
9
Apical Microleakage in Root Canals Containing Broken Rotary Instruments.含有折断旋转器械的根管内根尖微渗漏
Iran Endod J. 2017 Summer;12(3):360-365. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i3.16656.
10
The long-term sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta percha obturation techniques.一种环氧树脂根管封闭剂与五种牙胶尖充填技术联合使用时的长期封闭能力。
Int Endod J. 2002 Mar;35(3):275-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00481.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Materials as Barriers to Coronal Microleakage in Root-Filled Teeth: An Study.三种不同材料作为根管充填牙齿冠方微渗漏屏障的封闭能力比较评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S659-S662. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_921_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
Simplified Orthograde Apical Plug and Intra-Orifice Barriers for Resolving a Complex Endodontic Challenge: A Case Report.简化顺行根尖堵塞术和根管口屏障术解决复杂牙髓治疗难题:病例报告
Iran Endod J. 2023;18(4):271-273. doi: 10.22037/iej.v18i4.43108.
3
Evaluating the Effect of Different Intra-Orifice Barriers and Various Bleaching Agents on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth After the Walking Bleach Procedure: An In Vitro Study.评估不同根管口屏障和各种漂白剂对行内漂白术后牙齿抗折性的影响:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40509. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40509. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Histological Evaluation of Periapical Tissues after Root Canal Treatment with or without Coronal Seal in Dogs for Six Months.犬根管治疗后有无冠部封闭6个月根尖周组织的组织学评价
Iran Endod J. 2020 Fall;15(4):211-216. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i4.26811.
5
Evaluation of coronal microleakage of intra-orifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review.根管治疗后牙齿中根管口封闭材料的冠向微渗漏评估:一项系统评价
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):588-595. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_377_22. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers.评价不同内孔隔挡剂对牙本质内漂白剂向颈部渗透的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02300-4.
7
Effect of an Intraorifice Barrier on Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.管内屏障对根管治疗牙的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 20;2022:2789073. doi: 10.1155/2022/2789073. eCollection 2022.
8
Importance and methodologies of endodontic microleakage studies: A systematic review.牙髓微渗漏研究的重要性及方法:一项系统评价
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jun 1;9(6):e812-e819. doi: 10.4317/jced.53604. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: A bacterial microleakage study.三种新开发的根管封闭剂封闭能力的评估:一项细菌微渗漏研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Dec 1;8(5):e561-e565. doi: 10.4317/jced.52992. eCollection 2016 Dec.
10
Push-Out Bond Strength and Surface Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: An in vitro Study.硅酸钙基生物材料的推出粘结强度和表面显微硬度:一项体外研究
Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(2):139-145. doi: 10.1159/000453455. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth.不同材料在根管治疗牙中封闭根尖孔的能力。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jan 1;16(1):e105-9.
2
Effect of two storage solutions on surface topography of two root-end fillings.两种储存溶液对两种根尖充填材料表面形貌的影响。
Aust Endod J. 2009 Dec;35(3):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00137.x.
3
Antibacterial effects of five different root canal sealing materials.五种不同根管封闭材料的抗菌作用
J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;50(4):469-74. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.50.469.
4
Comparison of microleakage with three different thicknesses of mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling material.三种不同厚度的三氧化矿物凝聚体作为根尖充填材料时的微渗漏比较。
J Oral Sci. 2008 Sep;50(3):273-7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.50.273.
5
The properties of a new endodontic material.一种新型牙髓材料的特性。
J Endod. 2008 Aug;34(8):990-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
6
Fluid flow evaluation of Fuji Triage and gray and white ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate intraorifice barriers.富士分诊法以及灰色和白色的MTA根尖孔屏障的流体流动评估
J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):830-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 2.
7
Effect of orifice plugs on periapical inflammation in dogs.孔塞对犬根尖周炎症的影响。
J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):524-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.005.
8
Antibacterial effect of selected root-end filling materials.所选根尖充填材料的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.009. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
9
Sealing ability of three materials in the orifice of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha.三种材料在牙胶充填的根管系统根尖孔处的封闭能力。
J Endod. 2006 Mar;32(3):225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.042.
10
Effects of an intracanal glass ionomer barrier on coronal microleakage in teeth with post space.根管内玻璃离子屏障对有桩腔牙齿冠部微渗漏的影响。
J Endod. 2006 Feb;32(2):120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.033.