• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征后无创心脏检查的使用情况及费用:来自艾伯塔省COAPT研究的见解

Utilization and Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Tests After Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Alberta COAPT Study.

作者信息

Bainey Kevin R, Durham Daniel, Zheng Yinggan, Westerhout Cynthia M, Kaul Padma, Welsh Robert C

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

The Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2019 Feb 19;1(2):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.006
PMID:32159087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although appropriate noninvasive cardiac tests (NICTs) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) provide useful prognostic information, inappropriate use leads to inefficient expenditure of existing healthcare resources. By using the Alberta ntemporary cute Coronary Syndrome atient Invasive reatment Strategies (COAPT) Registry, we evaluated the use and costs of NICTs among patients discharged within 1 year after ACS.

METHODS

All patients discharged from the hospital with a primary diagnosis of ACS in Alberta between 2004/2005 and 2015/2016 were included. Frequency of NICTs (stress tests [± imaging] and nonstress imaging tests) was determined from linked provincial databases. Costs were obtained from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan Medical Procedure List.

RESULTS

Of 55,516 patients with ACS, 30,760 had at least 1 NICT (55.4%), with 13,505 (24.3%) having > 1 NICT performed within 1 year. Temporal trends of NICT increased over time (stress tests:  trend < 0.001; nonstress imaging tests: trend < 0.001). NICT most commonly occurred within the first 4 months after hospital discharge (stress tests at 2 months; nonstress imaging tests at 3-4 months). In 2015/2016, the total estimated costs of NICT were $1.35M, a 22.4% increase from 2004/2005 (1.10M) ( 0.001), whereas a decrease in incidence of ACS over the same time period was noted ( 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of NICT 1 year after ACS are high and increasing over time. Estimated costs of NICT appear to be escalating out of proportion to the ACS growth. Further investigation is warranted because it is speculative whether the increase in NICT and costs results in clinical benefit after ACS.

摘要

背景

尽管急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后进行适当的非侵入性心脏检查(NICT)可提供有用的预后信息,但不恰当的使用会导致现有医疗资源的低效消耗。通过使用艾伯塔省当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者侵入性治疗策略(COAPT)登记系统,我们评估了ACS后1年内出院患者NICT的使用情况及成本。

方法

纳入2004/2005年至2015/2016年期间在艾伯塔省因初步诊断为ACS而出院的所有患者。NICT(负荷试验[±成像]和非负荷成像检查)的频率通过关联的省级数据库确定。成本从艾伯塔省医疗保险计划医疗程序清单中获取。

结果

在55516例ACS患者中,30760例至少进行了1次NICT(55.4%),其中13505例(24.3%)在1年内进行了>1次NICT。NICT的时间趋势随时间增加(负荷试验:趋势<0.001;非负荷成像检查:趋势<0.001)。NICT最常发生在出院后的前4个月内(负荷试验在2个月时;非负荷成像检查在3 - 4个月时)。在2015/2016年,NICT的总估计成本为135万美元,较2004/2005年(110万美元)增加了22.4%(P<0.001),而同期ACS的发病率有所下降(P<0.008)。

结论

ACS后1年的NICT使用率较高且随时间增加。NICT的估计成本似乎与ACS的增长不成比例地上升。鉴于NICT及成本的增加是否会给ACS后带来临床益处尚不确定,因此有必要进行进一步调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/5e47c90a608d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/e976f905ed74/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/bd380aad5e27/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/5e47c90a608d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/e976f905ed74/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/bd380aad5e27/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/482b/7063613/5e47c90a608d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization and Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Tests After Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Alberta COAPT Study.急性冠状动脉综合征后无创心脏检查的使用情况及费用:来自艾伯塔省COAPT研究的见解
CJC Open. 2019 Feb 19;1(2):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Alberta Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Invasive Treatment Strategies (COAPT) study.急性冠状动脉综合征治疗及预后的医院差异:来自艾伯塔当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者侵入性治疗策略(COAPT)研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.109. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Ethnic and sex differences in ambulance activation among hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study.住院急性冠状动脉综合征患者中救护车激活的种族和性别差异:来自艾伯塔省当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者介入治疗策略(COAPT)研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.035. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
Optimal medical therapy at discharge in patients with acute coronary syndromes: temporal changes, characteristics, and 1-year outcome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院时的最佳药物治疗:时间变化、特征及1年结局
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.040. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy at Discharge on One-year Direct Medical Costs in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Retrospective, Observational Database Analysis in China.出院时最佳药物治疗对中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者一年直接医疗费用的影响:一项回顾性、观察性数据库分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):456-465.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Acute coronary syndromes in Europe: 1-year costs and outcomes.欧洲急性冠状动脉综合征:1年的成本与结局
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Mar;23(3):495-503. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167462.
7
Appropriateness of elective percutaneous coronary intervention and impact of government health insurance scheme - A tertiary centre experience from Western India.选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的适宜性及政府医疗保险计划的影响——来自印度西部一家三级中心的经验
Indian Heart J. 2017 Sep-Oct;69(5):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
The high cost of critical care unit over-utilization for patients with NSTE ACS.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者重症监护病房过度使用的高昂成本。
Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 19.
9
Variation in critical care unit admission rates and outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes or heart failure among high- and low-volume cardiac hospitals.高容量和低容量心脏医院中急性冠状动脉综合征或心力衰竭患者重症监护病房收治率及预后的差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Feb 27;4(3):e001708. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001708.
10
Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain.应激 CMR 可减少中危急性胸痛患者的血运重建、住院再入院和再次心脏检查。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(7):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.022. Epub 2013 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.加拿大临床实践的不当使用:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.
2
Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease in a Population-Based Cohort of High-Cost Healthcare Services Users.高成本医疗服务使用者人群队列中心血管疾病的患病率。
CJC Open. 2021 Sep 24;4(2):180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.017. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Patterns of Left-Ventricular Function Assessment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者左心室功能评估模式

本文引用的文献

1
Population-level incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Insights from the Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study.人群水平的非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA)的发病率和结局:来自艾伯塔省当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者有创治疗策略(COAPT)研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;264:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Population-Based Study on Patterns of Cardiac Stress Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心脏负荷试验模式的基于人群的研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003660.
3
CJC Open. 2021 Feb 1;3(6):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.12.028. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
4
Impact of the Publication of Appropriate Use Criteria on Utilization Rates of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Studies in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.适当使用标准的发布对加拿大安大略省心肌灌注成像研究利用率的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 5;6(6):e005961. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005961.
5
Hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Alberta Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Invasive Treatment Strategies (COAPT) study.急性冠状动脉综合征治疗及预后的医院差异:来自艾伯塔当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者侵入性治疗策略(COAPT)研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.109. Epub 2017 May 5.
6
Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on South Asian Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: Results From the APPROACH Registry.心脏康复对南亚心血管疾病患者的影响:APPROACH注册研究结果
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;32(10 Suppl 2):S397-S402. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
8
Stress Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Affairs HealthCare System: Insights from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.退伍军人事务医疗系统中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的压力测试:来自退伍军人事务临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Sep;8(5):486-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001561. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
10
ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 多模态适用于稳定型缺血性心脏病的检测和风险评估的适当使用标准:美国心脏病学会基金会适当使用标准工作组、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、美国心力衰竭学会、美国心律学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会和胸外科医师学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):380-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 16.