资源能否拯救理性？认知与感知中的“反贝叶斯”更新。
Can resources save rationality? "Anti-Bayesian" updating in cognition and perception.
机构信息
Baruch College, CUNY Graduate Center, Department of Philosophy, New York,
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
出版信息
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Mar 11;43:e16. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001717.
Resource rationality may explain suboptimal patterns of reasoning; but what of "anti-Bayesian" effects where the mind updates in a direction opposite the one it should? We present two phenomena - belief polarization and the size-weight illusion - that are not obviously explained by performance- or resource-based constraints, nor by the authors' brief discussion of reference repulsion. Can resource rationality accommodate them?
资源理性也许可以解释推理的非最佳模式；但是，当思维的更新方向与应该的方向相反时，“反贝叶斯”效应又如何解释呢？我们提出了两个现象——信念极化和大小重量错觉——它们显然不能用基于表现或资源的限制来解释，也不能用作者对参照排斥的简短讨论来解释。资源理性可以容纳它们吗？
Zotero 插件