Department of Exercise Physiology, Beijing Sport University, China.
Sport Biological Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing.
J Athl Train. 2020 Apr;55(4):329-335. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-529-18. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Among sports-recovery methods, cold-water immersion (CWI), contrast-water therapy (CWT), and whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) have been applied widely to enhance recovery after strenuous exercise. However, the different timing effects in exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) after these recovery protocols remain unknown.
To compare the effects of CWI, CWT, and WBC on the timing-sequence recovery of EIMD through different indicator responses.
Crossover study.
Laboratory.
Twelve male middle- and long-distance runners from the Beijing Sport University (age = 21.00 ± 0.95 years).
INTERVENTION(S): Participants were treated with different recovery methods (control [CON], CWI, CWT, WBC) immediately postexercise and at 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured perceived sensation using a visual analog scale (VAS), plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) activity, and vertical-jump height (VJH) pre-exercise, immediately postexercise, and at 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postexercise.
For the VAS score and CK activity, WBC exhibited better timing-sequence recovery effects than CON and CWI ( < .05), but the CWT demonstrated better effects than CON ( < .05). The CRP activity was lower after WBC than after the other interventions ( < .05). The VJH was lower after WBC than after CON and CWI ( < .05).
The WBC positively affected VAS, CK, CRP, and VJH associated with EIMD. The CWT and CWI also showed positive effects. However, for the activity and timing-sequence effect, CWT had weaker effects than WBC.
在运动恢复方法中,冷水浸泡(CWI)、对比水疗(CWT)和全身冷冻疗法(WBC)已广泛应用于剧烈运动后的恢复。然而,这些恢复方案后运动性肌肉损伤(EIMD)的不同时间效应尚不清楚。
通过不同指标反应比较 CWI、CWT 和 WBC 对 EIMD 时间序列恢复的影响。
交叉研究。
实验室。
来自北京体育大学的 12 名男性中长跑运动员(年龄=21.00±0.95 岁)。
参与者在运动后立即和 24、48 和 72 小时后接受不同的恢复方法(对照[CON]、CWI、CWT、WBC)治疗。
我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量感觉,测量血浆肌酸激酶(CK)活性、血浆 C 反应蛋白(CRP)活性和垂直跳跃高度(VJH),分别在运动前、运动后立即、1、24、48、72 和 96 小时。
对于 VAS 评分和 CK 活性,WBC 比 CON 和 CWI 表现出更好的时间序列恢复效果(<0.05),但 CWT 比 CON 效果更好(<0.05)。WBC 后 CRP 活性低于其他干预措施(<0.05)。WBC 后 VJH 低于 CON 和 CWI(<0.05)。
WBC 对与 EIMD 相关的 VAS、CK、CRP 和 VJH 产生积极影响。CWT 和 CWI 也表现出积极的影响。然而,对于活性和时间序列效应,CWT 的效果比 WBC 弱。