Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Retired Speech-Language Pathologist, formerly with the School District of Brown Deer, WI.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):441-456. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00078. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Purpose Persuasive communication skills are vital for achieving success in school, at work, and in social relationships. To facilitate assessment of persuasive discourse, we developed a clinically feasible persuasive speaking protocol and used it to compile a database of language samples. This database allowed us to describe the properties of adolescents' persuasive speaking skills. Method We collected spoken language samples from 179 typically developing students in Grades 8-12, recruited from the United States and Australia. Participants were asked to persuade an authority figure to make a change in a rule or policy. Results Language performance data reflecting both microstructural and macrostructural properties of spoken language were summarized and broken down by grade. We completed a factor analysis that documented three latent variables (syntax, discourse difficulties, and content). To test the validity of the persuasive measures, a subset of the participants completed an additional battery of assessments, which revealed weak to moderate relationships between the persuasive measures, general language ability, and working memory. There was no significant relationship between the persuasive language measures and an assessment of personality. Conclusion Our persuasive language sampling protocol facilitated the collection of valid language performance data. The summary data can be used as benchmarks for clinical evaluations of adolescents suspected of having language difficulties.
目的 说服性沟通技巧对于在学校、工作和社交关系中取得成功至关重要。为了便于评估说服性话语,我们开发了一种临床可行的说服性演讲协议,并使用该协议编制了语言样本数据库。该数据库使我们能够描述青少年说服性演讲技巧的特征。
方法 我们从美国和澳大利亚的 8 至 12 年级的 179 名典型发展学生中收集了口语样本。要求参与者说服权威人士改变规则或政策。
结果 总结并按年级划分了反映口语微观结构和宏观结构特征的语言表现数据。我们完成了一项因子分析,记录了三个潜在变量(语法、话语困难和内容)。为了测试说服性措施的有效性,一部分参与者完成了额外的评估,结果显示,说服性措施与一般语言能力和工作记忆之间存在弱到中度的关系。在说服性语言措施与个性评估之间没有显著关系。
结论 我们的说服性语言抽样协议有助于收集有效的语言表现数据。汇总数据可作为对疑似语言障碍的青少年进行临床评估的基准。