• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度古吉拉特邦吉尔自然保护区豹(Panthera pardus fusca)和亚洲狮(Panthera leo persica)的时空分区与共存。

Spatio-temporal partitioning and coexistence between leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) and Asiatic lion (Panthera leo persica) in Gir protected area, Gujarat, India.

机构信息

Department of Wildlife Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

Centre for Woman's Studies, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229045. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229045
PMID:32160193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065753/
Abstract

Time and space are essential niche dimensions along which species tend to coexist. We assessed spatiotemporal resource partitioning between leopards and lions and hypothesized the differential use of spatiotemporal resources by leopards with respect to lions. We used a systematic camera trap survey to collect the data at 50 sites. The data were analyzed using overlap indices, and non-parametric test statistics to assess the spatiotemporal associations. Leopard and lion were crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity pattern. They did not segregate temporally and showed substantially high overlap and strong temporal association. Leopard segregates with lion spatially by overlapping less and showing no association in space use at specific camera trap sites. Leopards showed preference for dense habitats, while the lion preferred both dense and open habitats. Leopard showed moderate-overlap and positive association with key prey species, i.e., chital and sambar. Lion, however showed low site-specific overlap and negative association with its crucial prey species, i.e., sambar and wild pig. We conclude that site-specific spatial partitioning along with differential affinities for habitat is helping leopards to partition their spatio-temporal resources with lions and hence facilitate coexistence of leopards with lions in Gir forest.

摘要

时间和空间是物种共存的重要生态位维度。我们评估了豹和狮子之间的时空资源分割,并假设豹相对于狮子会有差异地利用时空资源。我们使用系统的相机陷阱调查在 50 个地点收集数据。使用重叠指数和非参数测试统计来评估时空关联。豹和狮子的活动模式为黄昏和夜间型。它们没有时间上的隔离,表现出高度的重叠和强烈的时间关联。豹通过重叠较少与狮子在空间上隔离,在特定的相机陷阱地点没有空间使用上的关联。豹偏爱密集的栖息地,而狮子则偏爱密集和开阔的栖息地。豹与关键猎物物种(如梅花鹿和水鹿)表现出中度重叠和正关联。然而,狮子与关键猎物物种(如水鹿和野猪)的特定地点的重叠度低且呈负关联。我们的结论是,特定于地点的空间分割以及对栖息地的不同偏好有助于豹与狮子分割它们的时空资源,从而促进在吉尔森林中豹与狮子的共存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/50d5a27b3fc8/pone.0229045.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/25798992ffbd/pone.0229045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/999e54ebd3fe/pone.0229045.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/c93c848f716d/pone.0229045.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/c98515f11d47/pone.0229045.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/7f753d771456/pone.0229045.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/4f8f8ba43190/pone.0229045.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/156df4a52d8f/pone.0229045.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/156cc033b715/pone.0229045.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/713395b23e6a/pone.0229045.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/368701b2bc6f/pone.0229045.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/998d70de5aca/pone.0229045.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/50d5a27b3fc8/pone.0229045.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/25798992ffbd/pone.0229045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/999e54ebd3fe/pone.0229045.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/c93c848f716d/pone.0229045.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/c98515f11d47/pone.0229045.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/7f753d771456/pone.0229045.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/4f8f8ba43190/pone.0229045.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/156df4a52d8f/pone.0229045.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/156cc033b715/pone.0229045.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/713395b23e6a/pone.0229045.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/368701b2bc6f/pone.0229045.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/998d70de5aca/pone.0229045.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a8/7065753/50d5a27b3fc8/pone.0229045.g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatio-temporal partitioning and coexistence between leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) and Asiatic lion (Panthera leo persica) in Gir protected area, Gujarat, India.印度古吉拉特邦吉尔自然保护区豹(Panthera pardus fusca)和亚洲狮(Panthera leo persica)的时空分区与共存。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229045. eCollection 2020.
2
Lions and leopards coexist without spatial, temporal or demographic effects of interspecific competition.狮子和豹子共存,没有种间竞争的空间、时间或种群动态效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1709-1726. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12883. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Spatially explicit density and its determinants for Asiatic lions in the Gir forests.吉尔国家公园亚洲狮的空间密度及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 19;15(2):e0228374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228374. eCollection 2020.
4
Changes in ecological conditions may influence intraguild competition: inferring interaction patterns of snow leopard with co-predators.生态条件的变化可能会影响种内竞争:推断雪豹与其共同捕食者的相互作用模式。
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 25;10:e14277. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14277. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of trophy hunting on lion and leopard populations in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚狩猎奖杯对狮子和豹子数量的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):142-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01576.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
6
Every hill has its leopard: patterns of space use by leopards () in a mixed use landscape in India.每座山都有其豹踪:印度混合利用景观中豹()的空间利用模式
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 8;8:e10072. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10072. eCollection 2020.
7
Free-ranging livestock altered the spatiotemporal behavior of the endangered North Chinese leopard (Panthera pardus japonensis) and its prey and intensified human-leopard conflicts.散养牲畜改变了濒危物种华北豹(Panthera pardus japonensis)及其猎物的时空行为,并加剧了人豹冲突。
Integr Zool. 2023 Jan;18(1):143-156. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12635. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Living with lions: the economics of coexistence in the Gir forests, India.与狮子共存:印度吉尔森林的共存经济学。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e49457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049457. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
9
First record of Toxoplasma gondii antibodiesin Royal Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) and Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica) in India.印度皇家孟加拉虎(Panthera tigris tigris)和亚洲狮(Panthera leo persica)中弓形虫抗体的首次记录。
Vet Ital. 2019 Jun 30;55(2):157-162. doi: 10.12834/VetIt.971.5066.3.
10
Facilitation of a free-roaming apex predator in working lands: evaluating factors that influence leopard spatial dynamics and prey availability in a South African biodiversity hotspot.在工作用地上促进顶级掠食者的自由活动:评估影响南非生物多样性热点地区豹空间动态和猎物可获得性的因素。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 25;11:e14575. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14575. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Home range, habitat use and capture-release of translocated leopards in Gir landscape, Gujarat, India.印度古吉拉特邦吉尔景观中被转移的豹子的家域、栖息地利用和捕获-释放。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0305278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305278. eCollection 2024.
2
Occurrence and temporal overlap of sympatric jungle cats and leopard cats in Parsa‒Koshi Complex, Nepal.尼泊尔帕萨—科希复合体中同域分布的丛林猫和豹猫的发生和时间重叠。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):2387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52644-w.
3
Understanding carnivore interactions in a cold arid trans-Himalayan landscape: What drives co-existence patterns within predator guild along varying resource gradients?

本文引用的文献

1
Lions and leopards coexist without spatial, temporal or demographic effects of interspecific competition.狮子和豹子共存,没有种间竞争的空间、时间或种群动态效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1709-1726. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12883. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Low leopard populations in protected areas of Maputaland: a consequence of poaching, habitat condition, abundance of prey, and a top predator.马普托兰保护区内豹种群数量稀少:偷猎、栖息地状况、猎物丰富度及顶级捕食者的影响
Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 23;7(6):1964-1973. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2771. eCollection 2017 Mar.
3
Quantitative measurement of food selection : A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index.
了解寒冷干旱的跨喜马拉雅地区食肉动物的相互作用:是什么驱动了捕食者群落中沿不同资源梯度的共存模式?
Ecol Evol. 2023 May 11;13(5):e10040. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10040. eCollection 2023 May.
4
High striped hyena density suggests coexistence with humans in an agricultural landscape, Rajasthan.高条纹鬣狗密度表明在拉贾斯坦邦的农业景观中与人类共存。
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0266832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266832. eCollection 2022.
食物选择的定量测量:饲料比例和伊夫列夫选择性指数的一种改进方法。
Oecologia. 1974 Dec;14(4):413-417. doi: 10.1007/BF00384581.
4
Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient.时空相互作用促进大型食肉动物在资源梯度上的同域共存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1860.
5
Spatial and temporal avoidance of risk within a large carnivore guild.大型食肉动物群落内风险的时空规避
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 16;7(1):189-199. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2616. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
In the absence of a "landscape of fear": How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist.在没有“恐惧景观”的情况下:狮子、鬣狗和猎豹如何共存。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 6;6(23):8534-8545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2569. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Spatial Niche Segregation of Sympatric Stone Marten and Pine Marten--Avoidance of Competition or Selection of Optimal Habitat?同域分布的石貂和松貂的空间生态位分离——是避免竞争还是选择最优栖息地?
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0139852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139852. eCollection 2015.
8
Spatial interactions between sympatric carnivores: asymmetric avoidance of an intraguild predator.同域食肉动物之间的空间相互作用:对集团内捕食者的不对称回避
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jul;5(14):2762-73. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1561. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Cheetahs and wild dogs show contrasting patterns of suppression by lions.猎豹和野狗在狮子的压制下呈现出截然不同的模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Nov;83(6):1418-27. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12231. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.世界上最大的食肉动物的现状和生态影响。
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484.