Kent J S, Clopton J R
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Nov;44(6):964-71. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<964::aid-jclp2270440619>3.0.co;2-l.
This study examined the relation of eating attitudes and behaviors to family dynamics and psychological adjustment in a nonclinical group of female university freshmen. Family dynamics variables, which were measured by the Family Environment Scale (FES), included Control, Cohesion, Conflict, Organization, Expressiveness, Independence, Achievement-Orientation, Intellectual-Cultural Orientation, Active-Recreational Orientation, and Moral Religious Emphasis. Psychological adjustment was measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSC). Variables on this scale included Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Interpersonal Sensitivity. Eating attitudes and behaviors were measured by the Bulimia Test (BULIT), a 32-item self-report inventory. Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that bulimics, subclinical bulimics, and normals could be differentiated on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Univariate analyses revealed differences between the groups on all of the HSC measures and the Organization scale of the FES. The results suggest that conclusions about the causal relationships between maladaptive family patterns and bulimia presented in previous research should be viewed with caution.
本研究调查了非临床组大学一年级女生的饮食态度和行为与家庭动态及心理调适之间的关系。通过家庭环境量表(FES)测量的家庭动态变量包括控制、亲密度、冲突、组织性、表达性、独立性、成就取向、智力文化取向、积极娱乐取向和道德宗教强调。心理调适通过霍普金斯症状清单(HSC)进行测量。该量表上的变量包括焦虑、抑郁、躯体化、强迫观念及行为和人际敏感。饮食态度和行为通过贪食症测试(BULIT)进行测量,这是一份包含32个条目的自我报告问卷。多变量方差分析表明,在霍普金斯症状清单上,暴食症患者、亚临床暴食症患者和正常人群可以被区分开来。单变量分析揭示了各组在所有HSC测量指标以及FES的组织性量表上存在差异。结果表明,对于先前研究中提出的适应不良家庭模式与暴食症之间因果关系的结论应谨慎看待。