• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长叶拟复叶耳蕨的复活及新种-狭基拟复叶耳蕨的提出。

Resurrection of the Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb. and proposal of the new species-P. angusticellum.

机构信息

Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Department of Algology and Mycology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0230237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230237. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230237
PMID:32160254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065767/
Abstract

Plagiothecium longisetum was described by Lindberg in 1872, based on Maximowicz materials from Japan. In the 1970s, this species was synonymized with P. nemorale. However, a polyphasic approach applied to the investigation of the P. nemorale sensu lato showed a clear separation between the specimens of former P. longisetum and the type of P. nemorale. Morphological features and molecular analyses provide evidence that those two groups are distinct, as well as allowed to describe the new species. The results are strongly supported by the statistical analyses of morphometric features and phylogenetic analyses based on concatenated nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers. The maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses of ITS, rps4 and rpl16 regions place both species outside the P. nemorale group. The distinctions between individual species, reflected by the morphological features-easy to observe-and the molecular data, provide a scientific foundation for the resurrection of P. longisetum Lindb. and establishment of a new species-P. angusticellum sp. nov.

摘要

长叶绢藓是林德贝格于 1872 年根据日本的马克西莫维茨标本描述的,曾在 20 世纪 70 年代被归并到绢藓属中。然而,对广义绢藓属的多相研究表明,长叶绢藓标本与绢藓属的模式种明显不同。形态特征和分子分析表明,这两个群体是不同的,也允许描述新的物种。形态特征的统计分析以及基于核和叶绿体 DNA 标记的系统发育分析结果强烈支持这一观点。ITS、rps4 和 rpl16 区域的最大似然法(ML)和贝叶斯推断(BI)分析将这两个物种都置于绢藓属之外。个体种之间的区别,体现在形态特征(易于观察)和分子数据上,为林德贝格长叶绢藓的复活和新种——狭叶绢藓的建立提供了科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/8d9abb7e83c3/pone.0230237.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/058adb222be8/pone.0230237.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/0c9e52d43dfb/pone.0230237.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/2ebe103c2e26/pone.0230237.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/6752124a0a24/pone.0230237.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/fb2eea735c7d/pone.0230237.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/8d9abb7e83c3/pone.0230237.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/058adb222be8/pone.0230237.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/0c9e52d43dfb/pone.0230237.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/2ebe103c2e26/pone.0230237.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/6752124a0a24/pone.0230237.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/fb2eea735c7d/pone.0230237.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19bc/7065767/8d9abb7e83c3/pone.0230237.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Resurrection of the Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb. and proposal of the new species-P. angusticellum.长叶拟复叶耳蕨的复活及新种-狭基拟复叶耳蕨的提出。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0230237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230237. eCollection 2020.
2
A new synonym from Hawaii and lectotypification of (Plagiotheciaceae).来自夏威夷的一个新异名及(垂枝藓科)的后选模式指定
PhytoKeys. 2020 Oct 21;164:21-31. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.164.56612. eCollection 2020.
3
A comparison of 16 DNA regions for use as phylogenetic markers in the pleurocarpous moss genus Plagiothecium (Hypnales).对16个DNA区域进行比较,以用作侧蒴藓类Plagiothecium(灰藓目)系统发育标记。
Am J Bot. 2014 Apr;101(4):652-69. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1300269. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
4
Lectotypification of , a Hawaiian synonym of (Plagiotheciaceae).(曲尾藓科)夏威夷异名 的选模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Apr 21;177:11-15. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.177.64042. eCollection 2021.
5
Taxonomic revision of the Plagiothecium curvifolium complex.Plagiothecium curvifolium 复合体的分类修订。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0275665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275665. eCollection 2022.
6
Molecular identification of a new species of Rhigonema (Nematoda: Rhigonematidae) and phylogenetic relationships within the infraorder Rhigonematomorpha.分子鉴定一新种 Rhigonema(线虫纲:Rhigonematidae)及其在 Rhigonematomorpha 亚目内的系统发育关系。
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Nov 15;15(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05544-9.
7
Species delimitation and cryptic diversity in the moss genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae).物种界定和藓纲 Scleropodium 属(真藓科)中的隐种多样性。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jun;63(3):891-903. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
8
Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida).柳叶藓科(真藓目)的系统发育与形态演化
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Apr;23(1):1-21. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1067.
9
Molecular phylogeny of Plagiothecium and similar hypnalean mosses, with a revised sectional classification of Plagiothecium.匍灯藓属及类似的Hypnalean藓类的分子系统发育,以及匍灯藓属的修订后的组分类
Cladistics. 2018 Oct;34(5):469-501. doi: 10.1111/cla.12210. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
Reassessment of the taxonomic structure of the diazotrophic genus Azoarcus sensu lato and description of three new genera and new species, Azovibrio restrictus gen. nov., sp. nov., Azospira oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Azonexus fungiphilus gen. nov., sp. nov.重评估兼性营养型固氮菌属(Azoarcus sensu lato)的分类结构,并描述三个新属和新物种,即限制性偶氮弧菌(Azovibrio restrictus)新属、新种,水稻偶氮螺菌(Azospira oryzae)新属、新种,以及嗜真菌偶氮杆菌(Azonexus fungiphilus)新属、新种。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000 Mar;50 Pt 2:649-659. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-2-649.

引用本文的文献

1
The genus (Plagiotheciaceae) in Europe - current state of knowledge, checklist and key to taxa.欧洲的 属(青藓科)——知识现状、分类名录及分类检索表
PhytoKeys. 2025 Mar 4;253:67-102. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.253.142268. eCollection 2025.
2
Re-assessment of type material of Broth. and descriptions of four new taxa (Bryophyta, Plagiotheciaceae) from Australasia.重新评估布鲁特(Broth.)的模式标本并描述来自澳大拉西亚的四个新分类群(苔藓植物门,斜蒴藓科)。
PhytoKeys. 2024 Feb 9;238:95-117. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.238.114303. eCollection 2024.
3
New taxa of (Plagiotheciaceae) from Pakistan.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular phylogeny of Plagiothecium and similar hypnalean mosses, with a revised sectional classification of Plagiothecium.匍灯藓属及类似的Hypnalean藓类的分子系统发育,以及匍灯藓属的修订后的组分类
Cladistics. 2018 Oct;34(5):469-501. doi: 10.1111/cla.12210. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.MEGA X:跨越计算平台的分子进化遗传学分析。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096.
3
UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation.UFBoot2:改进超快bootstrap 逼近算法。
来自巴基斯坦的(垂枝藓科)新分类群。
PhytoKeys. 2023 Nov 23;236:1-16. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.236.109519. eCollection 2023.
4
Taxonomic revision of the Plagiothecium curvifolium complex.Plagiothecium curvifolium 复合体的分类修订。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0275665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275665. eCollection 2022.
5
Revision of the Original Material of var. (Turn.) Moore and New Synonyms for This Taxon.变种(Turn.)穆尔原始材料的修订及该分类单元的新同义词
Plants (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;11(19):2446. doi: 10.3390/plants11192446.
6
, a new species from the Aleutian Islands (Alaska, U.S.A.).,一种来自阿留申群岛(美国阿拉斯加)的新物种。
PhytoKeys. 2022 Apr 15;194:63-73. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.194.81652. eCollection 2022.
7
, a new species from the Aleutian Islands (Alaska, USA).一种来自阿留申群岛(美国阿拉斯加)的新物种。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Nov 5;184:127-138. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.184.69970. eCollection 2021.
8
The Genus Schimp. (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Eurasia: An Annotated Checklist with Distribution and Ecological Data.欧亚大陆的Schimp.属(藓纲真藓科):一份附有分布和生态数据的注释清单。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 26;10(5):868. doi: 10.3390/plants10050868.
9
A new synonym from Hawaii and lectotypification of (Plagiotheciaceae).来自夏威夷的一个新异名及(垂枝藓科)的后选模式指定
PhytoKeys. 2020 Oct 21;164:21-31. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.164.56612. eCollection 2020.
10
Lectotypification of the name Mitt. (Plagiotheciaceae), a basionym of (Mitt.) A. Jaeger.名称 Mitt.(青藓科)的选模式指定,(Mitt.) A. 耶格的基原异名。
PhytoKeys. 2020 Aug 7;155:141-153. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.155.51469. eCollection 2020.
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):518-522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281.
4
MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization.MAFFT 在线服务:多序列比对、交互式序列选择和可视化。
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1160-1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108.
5
PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses.PartitionFinder 2:用于选择分子和形态系统发育分析进化分区模型的新方法。
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Mar 1;34(3):772-773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260.
6
W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis.W-IQ-TREE:一种用于最大似然分析的快速在线系统发育工具。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W232-5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference.分区对系统发育推断的影响。
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jun;32(6):1611-27. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv026. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
A comparison of 16 DNA regions for use as phylogenetic markers in the pleurocarpous moss genus Plagiothecium (Hypnales).对16个DNA区域进行比较,以用作侧蒴藓类Plagiothecium(灰藓目)系统发育标记。
Am J Bot. 2014 Apr;101(4):652-69. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1300269. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.MrBayes 3.2:在大型模型空间中进行高效的贝叶斯系统发育推断和模型选择。
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. Epub 2012 Feb 22.