• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自夏威夷的一个新异名及(垂枝藓科)的后选模式指定

A new synonym from Hawaii and lectotypification of (Plagiotheciaceae).

作者信息

Wolski Grzegorz J, Proćków Jarosław

机构信息

Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, ul. Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland University of Lodz Lodz Poland.

Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Kożuchowska 7a, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences Wrocław Poland.

出版信息

PhytoKeys. 2020 Oct 21;164:21-31. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.164.56612. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3897/phytokeys.164.56612
PMID:33173402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7593317/
Abstract

was first described in 1927 by V.F. Brotherus, based on materials from Hawaii. It has, so far been, treated as a separate species. A detailed analysis of the original material housed in the New York Botanical Garden Herbarium (NY01256708) found the specimen to be characterised by a lack of metallic lustre; concave, asymmetrical, lanceolate to lanceolate-ovate leaves, shrunken in their dry condition; a straight, not denticulate, acute to apiculate apex; elongate-hexagonal cells in irregular transverse rows, 101-131 × 15-21 µm at mid-leaf; very lax areolation, with decurrencies composed of three rows of cells. These characteristics indicate that this species is identical to the original material of (e.g. H-SOL 1563 011; PC0132572). Hence, we propose that should be recognised as a new synonym of . In addition, a review of syntypes found one (H-SOL 1563 011) to have the same date of collection as the protologue, and to possess a quite abundant gametophyte turf with well-preserved sporophytes, indicating it to be fertile. Considering the above, we propose that specimen H-SOL 1563 011 be designated the lectotype of .

摘要

1927年,V.F. 布罗特鲁斯根据来自夏威夷的材料首次对其进行了描述。到目前为止,它一直被视为一个独立的物种。对存放在纽约植物园标本馆(NY01256708)的原始材料进行的详细分析发现,该标本的特征是缺乏金属光泽;叶片呈凹形、不对称,披针形至披针形卵形,干燥时收缩;顶端直,无细齿,锐尖至具小尖;叶中部的细胞呈细长六边形,不规则横向排列,大小为101 - 131×15 - 21微米;细胞间隙非常疏松,由三排细胞组成下延部分。这些特征表明该物种与(如H - SOL 1563 011;PC0132572)的原始材料相同。因此,我们提议应将其视为的一个新异名。此外,对的合模式标本进行审查时发现,其中一个(H - SOL 1563 011)的采集日期与原始描述相同,并且具有相当丰富的配子体草皮和保存完好的孢子体,表明它是可育的。考虑到上述情况,我们提议将标本H - SOL 1563 011指定为的选型模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/81c83b3d57f9/phytokeys-164-021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/aa0cd301c3b5/phytokeys-164-021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/ec5950eb32b0/phytokeys-164-021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/356944e3ad6c/phytokeys-164-021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/de503a70df1f/phytokeys-164-021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/81c83b3d57f9/phytokeys-164-021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/aa0cd301c3b5/phytokeys-164-021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/ec5950eb32b0/phytokeys-164-021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/356944e3ad6c/phytokeys-164-021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/de503a70df1f/phytokeys-164-021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2218/7593317/81c83b3d57f9/phytokeys-164-021-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A new synonym from Hawaii and lectotypification of (Plagiotheciaceae).来自夏威夷的一个新异名及(垂枝藓科)的后选模式指定
PhytoKeys. 2020 Oct 21;164:21-31. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.164.56612. eCollection 2020.
2
Lectotypification of , a Hawaiian synonym of (Plagiotheciaceae).(曲尾藓科)夏威夷异名 的选模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Apr 21;177:11-15. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.177.64042. eCollection 2021.
3
Lectotypification of the name Mitt. (Plagiotheciaceae), a basionym of (Mitt.) A. Jaeger.名称 Mitt.(青藓科)的选模式指定,(Mitt.) A. 耶格的基原异名。
PhytoKeys. 2020 Aug 7;155:141-153. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.155.51469. eCollection 2020.
4
Why (Brid.) Schimp. (, Plagiotheciaceae) has priority over Mönk.?为什么(布里德.)施密普.(,柳叶藓科)比蒙克具有优先权?
PhytoKeys. 2024 Apr 12;241:103-120. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.241.118858. eCollection 2024.
5
Lectotypification, epitypification and history of the name Mönk. (Plagiotheciaceae).Mönk.(柳叶藓科)名称的选模式指定、后选模式指定及名称历史
PhytoKeys. 2022 Jan 24;189:1-8. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.189.77839. eCollection 2022.
6
New taxa of (Plagiotheciaceae) from Pakistan.来自巴基斯坦的(垂枝藓科)新分类群。
PhytoKeys. 2023 Nov 23;236:1-16. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.236.109519. eCollection 2023.
7
Resurrection of the Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb. and proposal of the new species-P. angusticellum.长叶拟复叶耳蕨的复活及新种-狭基拟复叶耳蕨的提出。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0230237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230237. eCollection 2020.
8
, a new species from the Aleutian Islands (Alaska, U.S.A.).,一种来自阿留申群岛(美国阿拉斯加)的新物种。
PhytoKeys. 2022 Apr 15;194:63-73. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.194.81652. eCollection 2022.
9
Re-assessment of type material of Broth. and descriptions of four new taxa (Bryophyta, Plagiotheciaceae) from Australasia.重新评估布鲁特(Broth.)的模式标本并描述来自澳大拉西亚的四个新分类群(苔藓植物门,斜蒴藓科)。
PhytoKeys. 2024 Feb 9;238:95-117. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.238.114303. eCollection 2024.
10
The Genus Schimp. (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Eurasia: An Annotated Checklist with Distribution and Ecological Data.欧亚大陆的Schimp.属(藓纲真藓科):一份附有分布和生态数据的注释清单。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 26;10(5):868. doi: 10.3390/plants10050868.

引用本文的文献

1
The genus (Plagiotheciaceae) in Europe - current state of knowledge, checklist and key to taxa.欧洲的 属(青藓科)——知识现状、分类名录及分类检索表
PhytoKeys. 2025 Mar 4;253:67-102. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.253.142268. eCollection 2025.
2
Lectotypification of , a Hawaiian synonym of (Plagiotheciaceae).(曲尾藓科)夏威夷异名 的选模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Apr 21;177:11-15. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.177.64042. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular phylogeny of Plagiothecium and similar hypnalean mosses, with a revised sectional classification of Plagiothecium.匍灯藓属及类似的Hypnalean藓类的分子系统发育,以及匍灯藓属的修订后的组分类
Cladistics. 2018 Oct;34(5):469-501. doi: 10.1111/cla.12210. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
Resurrection of the Plagiothecium longisetum Lindb. and proposal of the new species-P. angusticellum.长叶拟复叶耳蕨的复活及新种-狭基拟复叶耳蕨的提出。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0230237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230237. eCollection 2020.