Bayattork Mohammad, Sköld Margrethe Bordado, Sundstrup Emil, Andersen Lars Louis
Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2020 Feb 26;16(1):36-48. doi: 10.12965/jer.2040034.017. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Despite the widespread use of postural correction in exercise interventions, limited experimental evidence exists for its effectiveness. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature on the efficacy of exercise interventions in improving postural malalignment in head, neck, and trunk. A systematic review was performed by screening four scientific databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane database) for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English from 1996-2019. The review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines. Two researchers independently performed study screening, extracting data and assessing the risk of bias for each included study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating the risk of bias. A total of 22 RCTs comprising 1,209 participants were identified for inclusion in the review. There was a high risk of bias across most of the included studies (12 studies). Only two studies were classified as low risk of bias, and eight studies were classified as moderate risk of bias. The intervention duration ranged from 2 to 13 weeks, frequency from 2 to 4 days per week, and duration of each session between 15 to 60 min. The insufficiency and quality of included studies did not allow an integrated assessment of the efficacy of exercise interventions on postural malalignments; however, the positive effects noticed in most of the studies indicate some advantages but underscores the necessity of adequately designed RCTs in this field.
尽管姿势矫正广泛应用于运动干预中,但其有效性的实验证据有限。本研究旨在系统回顾关于运动干预改善头、颈和躯干姿势不正疗效的文献。通过筛选四个科学数据库(MEDLINE、科学网、EBSCO和Cochrane数据库),检索1996年至2019年发表的英文随机对照试验(RCT),进行了一项系统评价。该评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)声明指南。两名研究人员独立进行研究筛选、提取数据,并使用Cochrane协作工具评估每个纳入研究的偏倚风险,以评估偏倚风险。共确定22项RCT(包括1209名参与者)纳入该评价。大多数纳入研究(12项研究)存在较高的偏倚风险。只有两项研究被归类为低偏倚风险,八项研究被归类为中度偏倚风险。干预持续时间为2至13周,频率为每周2至4天,每次训练持续时间为15至60分钟。纳入研究的不足和质量不允许对运动干预对姿势不正的疗效进行综合评估;然而,大多数研究中注意到的积极效果表明了一些优势,但也强调了在该领域进行充分设计的RCT的必要性。