• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拔管后不同模式无创通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究

Clinical Study of Different Modes of Non-invasive Ventilation Treatment in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Extubation.

作者信息

Ding Fei, Zhang Jingling, Zhang Wenya, Zhao Qian, Cheng Zimei, Wang Yang, Bo Tao, Wu Hui

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2020 Feb 25;8:63. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00063. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2020.00063
PMID:32161744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7053424/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of different non-invasive respiratory support methods in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after extubation. From Oct 2017 to 2018, 120 preterm infants were recruited from the NICUs of three hospitals. They were diagnosed with RDS and required mechanical ventilation. After extubation from mechanical ventilation, these infants were divided into NCPAP group, SNIPPV group and SNIPPV + NCPAP group. The time of non-invasive ventilation, reintubation rate within 72 h, success rate of non-invasive ventilation within 1 week, duration of oxygen therapy, hospital stay and incidence of complications were recorded and compared. Compared with the NCPAP group, the SNIPPV group and the SNIPPV + NCPAP group had significantly higher rate of successful extubation and removal from non-invasive ventilation within 1 week ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences among three groups in the time of non-invasive ventilation, time of oxygen therapy, hospital stay or incidence of complications ( > 0.05). SNIPPV + NCPAP after mechanical ventilation is a relatively safe and effective ventilation strategy for preterm infants with severe RDS. The use of NCPAP facilitates the turnover of SNIPPV ventilators in developing countries.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同无创呼吸支持方法对拔管后呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)早产儿的临床疗效及安全性。2017年10月至2018年,从三家医院的新生儿重症监护病房招募了120例早产儿。他们被诊断为RDS且需要机械通气。机械通气拔管后,这些婴儿被分为鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)组、同步鼻间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)组和SNIPPV+NCPAP组。记录并比较无创通气时间、72小时内再插管率、1周内无创通气成功率、氧疗时间、住院时间及并发症发生率。与NCPAP组相比,SNIPPV组和SNIPPV+NCPAP组1周内成功拔管及脱离无创通气的比例显著更高(<0.05)。三组在无创通气时间、氧疗时间、住院时间或并发症发生率方面无显著差异(>0.05)。机械通气后采用SNIPPV+NCPAP对重度RDS早产儿是一种相对安全有效的通气策略。在发展中国家,使用NCPAP有助于SNIPPV呼吸机的周转。

相似文献

1
Clinical Study of Different Modes of Non-invasive Ventilation Treatment in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Extubation.拔管后不同模式无创通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究
Front Pediatr. 2020 Feb 25;8:63. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00063. eCollection 2020.
2
A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation.一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较同步鼻间歇正压通气与鼻持续气道正压通气作为拔管模式的效果。
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):13-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13.
3
Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Prevention of Extubation Failure in Infants after Congenital Heart Surgery.同步鼻塞间歇性正压通气与鼻塞持续气道正压通气预防先天性心脏病术后婴儿拔管失败的比较。
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Mar 5;24(2):E249-E255. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3515.
4
Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.非同步鼻间歇正压通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿拔管后呼吸支持的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(10):1546-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1059809. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
5
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)用于早产儿拔管后
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4(9):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub2.
6
Evaluation of three non-invasive ventilation modes after extubation in the treatment of preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome.评估三种无创通气模式在治疗早产儿严重呼吸窘迫综合征拔管后的效果。
J Perinatol. 2022 Sep;42(9):1238-1243. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01461-y. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Short-term effects of synchronized vs. non-synchronized NIPPV in preterm infants: study protocol for an unmasked randomized crossover trial.早产儿同步与非同步经鼻间歇正压通气的短期效果:一项非盲随机交叉试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 14;22(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05351-0.
8
A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).一项关于同步鼻间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)作为孕周≥28周的呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)婴儿主要通气模式的前瞻性观察性试点研究。
J Perinatol. 2004 Aug;24(8):487-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211131.
9
A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams.一项关于非同步鼻咽间歇性强制通气(nsNIMV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)预防体重<1500克早产儿拔管失败的随机试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91 Suppl 3:S136-42.
10
Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP).与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)相比,同步经鼻间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)可降低呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)早产儿的呼吸功(WOB)。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Sep;41(9):875-81. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20461.

引用本文的文献

1
Postextubation use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis.早产儿拔管后无创呼吸支持的应用:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 11;7(7):CD014509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014509.pub2.
2
Efficacy and safety of different noninvasive ventilation strategies for postextubation respiratory support in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同无创通气策略用于新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征拔管后呼吸支持的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pediatr. 2024 Nov 15;12:1435518. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1435518. eCollection 2024.
3
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经气管插管拔管后的早产儿使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4.
4
Roles of Lung Ultrasound Score in the Extubation Failure From Mechanical Ventilation Among Premature Infants With Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome.肺部超声评分在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿机械通气撤机失败中的作用
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 6;9:709160. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.709160. eCollection 2021.
5
A Prediction Model of Extubation Failure Risk in Preterm Infants.早产儿拔管失败风险预测模型
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 22;9:693320. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.693320. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南-2019 更新版。
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
[A comparative study of two ventilation modes in the weaning phase of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome].[两种通气模式用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿撤机阶段的对比研究]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep;20(9):729-733. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.09.007.
3
[Research advances in neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation].[新生儿经鼻间歇正压通气的研究进展]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec;19(12):1301-1305. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.12.015.
4
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.拔管后早产儿使用鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.
5
Prospective economic evaluation alongside the non-invasive ventilation trial.与无创通气试验同步进行的前瞻性经济评估。
J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;37(1):61-66. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.159. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Extubating Extremely Preterm Infants: Predictors of Success and Outcomes following Failure.对极早产儿进行拔管:成功的预测因素及拔管失败后的结局
J Pediatr. 2016 Jun;173:45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
7
Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial.同步无创正压通气(NIPPV)在治疗早产儿呼吸暂停(AOP)方面是否比无创正压通气(NIPPV)和鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)更有效?一项随机交叉试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Jan;100(1):F17-23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305892. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
8
Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气中鼻塞与面罩的随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1170-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3548. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the newborn: review of literature and evidence-based guidelines.新生儿鼻内间歇正压通气:文献回顾与循证指南。
J Perinatol. 2010 Aug;30(8):505-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.165. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
10
Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.对患有呼吸窘迫的早产儿进行无创呼吸支持:持续气道正压通气和经鼻间歇正压通气。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Feb;14(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Oct 4.