Division of General Surgery, Center for Health Education Scholarship, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Center for Health Education Scholarship, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Med Educ. 2020 Jul;54(7):652-659. doi: 10.1111/medu.14153. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
Ongoing learning in complex clinical environments requires health professionals to assess their own performance, manage their learning, and modify their practices based on self-monitored progress. Self-regulated learning (SRL) theory suggests that although learners may be capable of such learning, they often need guidance to enact it effectively. Debriefings following simulation may be an ideal time to support learners' use of SRL in targeted areas, but the extent to which they are optimally fostering these practices has not been examined.
A qualitative study informed by grounded theory methodology was conducted in the context of three interprofessional in situ trauma simulations at our level 1 trauma centre. A total of 18 participants were interviewed both immediately and 5-6 weeks after the simulation experience. Transcripts were analysed using an iterative constant comparative approach to explore concepts and themes regarding the nature of learning from and after simulation.
During initial interviews, there were many examples of acquired content knowledge and straightforward practice changes that might not require ongoing SRL to enact well in practice. However, even for skills identified as needing to be 'worked on,' SRL strategies were lacking. At follow-up interviews, some participants had evolved more specific learning goals and rudimentary plans for implementation and improvement, but suggested this was prompted by the study interview questions rather than the simulation debriefing itself.
Overall, participants did not engage in fulsome development of SRL plans based on the simulation and debriefing; however, there were elements of SRL present, particularly after participants were given time to reflect on the interview questions and their own goals. This suggests that simulation training can support the use of SRL. However, debriefing approaches might be better optimised to take full advantage of the opportunity to encourage and foster SRL in practice after the simulation is over.
在复杂的临床环境中持续学习要求卫生专业人员评估自己的表现,管理自己的学习,并根据自我监测的进展修改自己的实践。自我调节学习(SRL)理论表明,尽管学习者可能有能力进行这种学习,但他们通常需要指导才能有效地实施。模拟后的汇报可能是支持学习者在目标领域使用 SRL 的理想时机,但它们在多大程度上最佳地促进这些实践尚未得到检验。
本研究是一项基于扎根理论方法的定性研究,在我们的一级创伤中心进行了三次跨专业现场创伤模拟。共有 18 名参与者在模拟体验后立即和 5-6 周后接受了访谈。使用迭代常数比较方法分析转录本,以探索关于从模拟中学习和模拟后学习的性质的概念和主题。
在最初的访谈中,有许多获得的内容知识和简单的实践改变的例子,这些可能不需要持续的 SRL 就能很好地在实践中实施。然而,即使是那些被认为需要“努力”的技能,也缺乏 SRL 策略。在后续访谈中,一些参与者已经制定了更具体的学习目标和初步的实施和改进计划,但这是由于研究访谈问题而不是模拟汇报本身。
总体而言,参与者并没有根据模拟和汇报充分制定 SRL 计划;然而,存在 SRL 的元素,特别是在参与者有时间反思访谈问题和自己的目标之后。这表明模拟培训可以支持 SRL 的使用。然而,汇报方法可能需要更好地优化,以充分利用模拟结束后鼓励和培养实践中 SRL 的机会。