Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):623-629. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2187810. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Many current educational approaches are intended to cultivate learners' full (learning) potential by fostering self-regulated learning (SRL), as it is expected that those learners with a high degree of SRL learn more effectively than those with a low degree of SRL. However, these attempts to foster SRL are not always successful. We considered complexities related to fostering self-regulated learning by use of an analogy. This analogy was based on two (Dutch) children's games: the treasure hunt (children can find a "treasure" by following directions, completing assignments and/or answering questions) and the dropping (pre-teens are dropped in the woods at nighttime with the assignment to find their way back home). We formulated four interrelated philosophical questions. These questions were not formulated with the intention to provide clear-cut answers, but were instead meant to evoke contemplation about the SRL concept. During this contemplation, the implications of definitional issues regarding SRL were discussed by use of the first question: What are the consequences of the difficulties to explicate what is (not) SRL? The second question (How does SRL relate to autonomy?) touched upon the intricate relationship between SRL and autonomy, by discussing the role of social interaction and varying degrees of instruction when fostering SRL. Next, a related topic was addressed by the third question: How much risk are we willing and able to take when fostering SRL? And finally, the importance of and possibilities to assess SRL were discussed by the fourth question (Should SRL be assessed?). From our contemplations it has become clear that approaches to foster SRL are often insufficiently aligned with the experience and needs of learners. Instead these approaches are commonly defined by contextual factors, such as misconceptions about SRL and lack of leeway for learners. Consequently, we have used principles that apply to both treasure hunts and droppings, to provide guidelines on how to align one's approach to foster SRL with the educational context and experience and needs of learners.
许多当前的教育方法旨在通过培养自我调节学习(SRL)来挖掘学习者的全部(学习)潜力,因为预计具有高度 SRL 的学习者比具有低度 SRL 的学习者学习效果更好。然而,这些培养 SRL 的尝试并不总是成功的。我们通过类比考虑了培养自我调节学习的复杂性。该类比基于两个(荷兰)儿童游戏:寻宝游戏(孩子们可以通过遵循指示、完成任务和/或回答问题找到“宝藏”)和空投游戏(青少年在夜间被空投到树林中,任务是找到回家的路)。我们制定了四个相互关联的哲学问题。这些问题的提出并不是为了提供明确的答案,而是为了唤起对 SRL 概念的思考。在思考过程中,通过使用第一个问题讨论了与 SRL 定义问题相关的含义:难以阐明什么是(不是)SRL 会产生什么后果?第二个问题(SRL 与自主性有何关系?)通过讨论在培养 SRL 时社会互动和不同程度的指导的作用,触及到了 SRL 和自主性之间复杂的关系。接下来,第三个问题涉及到一个相关的话题:在培养 SRL 时,我们愿意承担多少风险?最后,通过第四个问题(是否应该评估 SRL?)讨论了评估 SRL 的重要性和可能性。从我们的思考中可以清楚地看出,培养 SRL 的方法通常与学习者的经验和需求不一致。相反,这些方法通常是由背景因素定义的,例如对 SRL 的误解和学习者缺乏回旋余地。因此,我们使用了适用于寻宝游戏和空投游戏的原则,为如何根据教育背景以及学习者的经验和需求调整培养 SRL 的方法提供了指导方针。