Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark.
Cephalalgia. 2020 Jul;40(8):818-827. doi: 10.1177/0333102420911461. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Status migrainosus is a condition with limited epidemiological knowledge, and no evidence-based treatment guideline or rational-driven assessment of successful treatment outcome. To fill this gap, we performed a prospective observational study in which we documented effectiveness of treatment approaches commonly used in a tertiary headache clinic.
Patients with episodic and chronic migraine who experienced continuous and prolonged attacks for more than 72 hours were treated with dexamethasone (4 mg orally twice daily for 3 days), ketorolac (60 mg intramuscularly), bilateral nerve blocks (1-2% lidocaine, 0.1-0.2 ml for both supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, 1 ml for both auriculotemporal nerves, and 1 ml for both greater occipital nerves), or naratriptan (2.5 mg twice daily for 5 days). Hourly (for the first 24 hours) and daily (for first 30 days) change in headache intensity was documented using appropriate headache diaries.
Fifty-four patients provided eligible data for 60 treatment attempts. The success rate of rendering patients pain free within 24 hours and maintaining the pain-free status for 48 hours was 4/13 (31%) for dexamethasone, 7/29 (24%) for nerve blocks, 1/9 (11%) for ketorolac and 1/9 (11%) for naratriptan. These success rates depended on time to remission, as the longer we allowed the treatments to begin to work and patients to become pain free (i.e. 2, 12, 24, 48, 72, or 96 hours), the more likely patients were to achieve and maintain a pain-free status for at least 48 hours.
These findings suggest that current treatment approaches to terminating status migrainosus are not satisfactory and call attention to the need to develop a more scientific approach to define a treatment response for status migrainosus.
丛集性头痛是一种发病机制尚不明确的疾病,目前尚无循证医学治疗指南,也没有合理的治疗效果评估方法。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,记录了在三级头痛诊所中常用的治疗方法的有效性。
我们对发作性和慢性偏头痛患者进行了研究,这些患者经历了持续超过 72 小时的连续延长发作,接受了地塞米松(4mg 口服,每日两次,连续 3 天)、酮咯酸(60mg 肌内注射)、双侧神经阻滞(1-2%利多卡因,每侧眶上神经和滑车上神经各 0.1-0.2ml,每侧耳颞神经各 1ml,每侧枕大神经各 1ml)或那拉曲坦(2.5mg 口服,每日两次,连续 5 天)治疗。使用适当的头痛日记记录头痛强度的每小时(前 24 小时)和每日(前 30 天)变化。
54 名患者提供了 60 次治疗尝试的合格数据。在 24 小时内使患者无疼痛且在 48 小时内保持无疼痛状态的成功率为:地塞米松组 4/13(31%),神经阻滞组 7/29(24%),酮咯酸组 1/9(11%),那拉曲坦组 1/9(11%)。这些成功率取决于缓解时间,我们给予治疗的时间越长,患者越有可能在无疼痛状态下获得和维持至少 48 小时。
这些发现表明,目前终止丛集性头痛的治疗方法并不令人满意,并提醒人们需要开发一种更科学的方法来定义丛集性头痛的治疗反应。