Paek Margaret, Radkey Connor, Honeycutt Sally, Glynn M Kathleen
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Scientific Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Jun;80:101812. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101812. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Fellowship programs offer career development opportunities, provide experiential training, and can be used to recruit personnel to address specific challenges facing the public health workforce. Given the potential influence fellowships have on the future public health workforce, it is important to understand and articulate the results of such programs and to identify areas of improvement to meet current workforce needs. The purpose of this literature review was to identify common practices used to evaluate nonclinical fellowship programs. After a search of the internet and selected databases, we screened titles and abstracts using predetermined selection criteria. We then conducted a detailed review of selected papers to extract information about program characteristics (program description, sector, and program length) and evaluation characteristics (primary evaluation type, framework for evaluation, data collection methods, and respondent populations) from 33 papers. We found a limited number of published papers on the evaluation of nonclinical fellowship programs, and most focused on outcomes associated with fellows or alumni. The most useful papers for our purposes clearly described the evaluation framework that guided the evaluation.
奖学金项目提供职业发展机会，提供实践培训，并可用于招募人员以应对公共卫生劳动力面临的特定挑战。鉴于奖学金对未来公共卫生劳动力的潜在影响，了解并阐明此类项目的成果以及确定改进领域以满足当前劳动力需求非常重要。本文献综述的目的是确定用于评估非临床奖学金项目的常见做法。在搜索互联网和选定的数据库后，我们使用预先确定的选择标准筛选标题和摘要。然后，我们对选定的论文进行了详细审查，以从33篇论文中提取有关项目特征（项目描述、部门和项目时长）和评估特征（主要评估类型、评估框架、数据收集方法和受访者群体）的信息。我们发现关于非临床奖学金项目评估的已发表论文数量有限，且大多数关注与学员或校友相关的成果。对我们的目的最有用的论文清晰地描述了指导评估的评估框架。
