• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持初产妇:母乳喂养促进计划成功评估。

'Supporting a first-time mother': Assessment of success of a breastfeeding promotion programme.

机构信息

Sección de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain; Research Institute of the College of Nursing of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; Unidad de Cuidados de la Salud. Dirección Gral. de Programas Asistenciales, Servicio Canario de Salud, Canary Islands, Spain.

Sección de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2020 Jun;85:102687. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102687. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102687
PMID:32163797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to measure the effectiveness on breast feeding rates by the program 'Supporting a First-time Mother', a web-based platform of interactionbetween first-time mothers and breastfeeding-experienced women who act as peer-supporters.

METHODS

A randomized study with a control and intervention group was conducted between April and October 2016. Participants were recruited from Hospital Universitario de Canarias (Spain). Inclusive criteria were singleton pregnancy, healthy term baby, vaginal or assisted delivery. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group. Type of feeding (exclusive, partial or artificial) was noted at 3 and 6 months. The study also gathered information from the peer-supporters.

RESULTS

Data showed higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding in the intervention group,at both 3 and 6 months post delivery (76% vs 56%, p = 0.020; 47% vs 35%, p = 0.049). Taking part in the study also increased the overall success of breastfeeding 2.65 times (IC95%, 1.21-5.78, p = 0.014) at 3 months and 3.30 times (IC95% 1.52-7.17, p = 0.003) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A limitation of the study is mainly related to participation in the intervention. In spite of this limitation, this support programme increased breastfeeding rates 3 fold.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过“支持初产妇”项目来衡量母乳喂养率的有效性,这是一个基于网络的互动平台,让初产妇与作为同伴支持者的母乳喂养经验丰富的女性进行互动。

方法

2016 年 4 月至 10 月期间,进行了一项随机对照研究,参与者来自加那利群岛大学医院(西班牙)。纳入标准为单胎妊娠、健康足月婴儿、阴道分娩或辅助分娩。参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。在 3 个月和 6 个月时记录喂养方式(纯母乳喂养、部分母乳喂养或人工喂养)。该研究还收集了同伴支持者的信息。

结果

数据显示,干预组在产后 3 个月和 6 个月时纯母乳喂养率更高(76%比 56%,p=0.020;47%比 35%,p=0.049)。参与研究还使母乳喂养的总体成功率提高了 2.65 倍(95%CI,1.21-5.78,p=0.014),3 个月时提高了 3.30 倍(95%CI,1.52-7.17,p=0.003)。

结论

该研究的一个局限性主要与参与干预有关。尽管存在这一局限性,该支持计划仍使母乳喂养率提高了 3 倍。

相似文献

1
'Supporting a first-time mother': Assessment of success of a breastfeeding promotion programme.支持初产妇:母乳喂养促进计划成功评估。
Midwifery. 2020 Jun;85:102687. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102687. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers', midwives' and peer supporters' views and the effects on breastfeeding.英国布里斯托的同伴支持混合方法评估:母亲、助产士和同伴支持者的观点以及对母乳喂养的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Oct 20;13:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-192.
3
Barriers to timely initiation of breastfeeding among mothers of healthy full-term babies who deliver at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital.在哈科特港大学教学医院分娩的健康足月儿母亲中,及时开始母乳喂养的障碍。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2006 Jun;9(1):57-64.
4
Effectiveness of exclusive breastfeeding promotion in low-income mothers: a randomized controlled study.低收入母亲纯母乳喂养促进的效果:一项随机对照研究。
Breastfeed Med. 2009 Jun;4(2):63-9. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2008.0126.
5
Effects of psychosocial support during labour and childbirth on breastfeeding, medical interventions, and mothers' wellbeing in a Mexican public hospital: a randomised clinical trial.分娩期间心理社会支持对墨西哥一家公立医院母乳喂养、医疗干预及母亲幸福感的影响:一项随机临床试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Oct;105(10):1056-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09936.x.
6
Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness.母乳喂养同伴支持者和社区支持小组:评估其有效性。
Matern Child Nutr. 2005 Apr;1(2):111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00005.x.
7
A novel peer-support intervention using motivational interviewing for breastfeeding maintenance: a UK feasibility study.一种使用动机访谈促进母乳喂养维持的新型同伴支持干预措施:英国可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(77):1-138. doi: 10.3310/hta21770.
8
Breastfeeding outcome comparison by parity.按胎次比较母乳喂养结果。
Breastfeed Med. 2015 Apr;10(3):156-62. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0119. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
Exclusive breastfeeding increased by an internet intervention.通过网络干预增加纯母乳喂养率。
Breastfeed Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;10(1):20-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0093. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
The Effect of a Breastfeeding Motivation Program Maintained During Pregnancy on Supporting Breastfeeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial.孕期持续进行的母乳喂养激励项目对支持母乳喂养的影响:一项随机对照试验
Breastfeed Med. 2017 May;12:218-226. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0190. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of an Online Nursing Consultation to Encourage Breastfeeding.在线护理咨询对促进母乳喂养的效果
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04166-8.
2
The relationship between perceived social support and insufficient milk supply in primiparous mother.初产妇感知到的社会支持与乳汁供应不足之间的关系。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 Jul 28;59:e20250035. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0035en. eCollection 2025.
3
Reduce, reinforce, and replenish: safeguarding the early-life microbiota to reduce intergenerational health disparities.
减少、增强和补充:保护早期微生物群以减少代际健康差距。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;12:1455503. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1455503. eCollection 2024.
4
Pregnant women's experiences of online prenatal education in Korea during COVID-19: a phenomenological study.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间孕妇对在线产前教育的体验:一项现象学研究。
Womens Health Nurs. 2024 Sep;30(3):192-202. doi: 10.4069/whn.2024.09.09. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Use of volunteers in early years interventions for parents: A scoping review of roles and the extent of evaluation research in this area.利用志愿者开展早期父母干预:该领域角色及评估研究范围的综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0305551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305551. eCollection 2024.
6
A Scoping Review of Breastfeeding Interventions and Programs Conducted Across Spanish-Speaking Countries.对西班牙语国家开展的母乳喂养干预措施和项目的范围综述。
Health Promot Pract. 2025 Jan;26(1):168-191. doi: 10.1177/15248399241237950. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
8
Experiences of young Australian mothers with infant feeding.年轻澳大利亚母亲的婴儿喂养体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04796-8.
9
Barriers and Facilitators for Exclusive Breastfeeding within the Health System and Public Policies from In-Depth Interviews to Primary Care Midwives in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain).深入访谈特内里费岛(西班牙加那利群岛)初级保健助产士:卫生系统和公共政策中促进纯母乳喂养的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010128.
10
Remote provision of breastfeeding support and education: Systematic review and meta-analysis.远程提供母乳喂养支持和教育:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Apr;18(2):e13296. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13296. Epub 2021 Dec 29.