• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输精管切除术后疼痛的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Incidence of Post-Vasectomy Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology, Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051788.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17051788
PMID:32164161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7084350/
Abstract

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain incidences of post-vasectomy pain following traditional scalpel, or non-scalpel vasectomy. Electronic databases PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO were searched up to 1 July 2019 for peer-reviewed articles recording post-vasectomy pain. We identified 733 publications, screened 559 after removal of duplicates and excluded 533. Of the remaining 26 full-text articles, 8 were excluded with reasons, leaving 18 for detailed analyses. Meta-analysis was performed on 25 separate datasets (11 scalpel, 11 non-scalpel, 3 other/combined). Study follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 37 years and sample sizes from 12 to 723 patients. The overall incidence of post-vasectomy pain was 15% (95% CI 9% to 25%). The incidences of post-vasectomy pain following scalpel and non-scalpel techniques were 24% (95% CI 15% to 36%) and 7% (95% CI 4% to 13%), respectively. Post-vasectomy pain syndrome occurred in 5% (95% CI 3% to 8%) of subjects, with similar estimates for both techniques. We conclude that the overall incidence of post-vasectomy pain is greater than previously reported, with three-fold higher rates of pain following traditional scalpel, compared to non-scalpel vasectomy, whereas the incidence of post-vasectomy pain syndrome is similar.

摘要

这是第一项旨在确定传统手术刀(或非手术刀)输精管切除术术后疼痛发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析。截至 2019 年 7 月 1 日,我们在同行评审文献的电子数据库 PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO 中搜索了记录输精管切除术后疼痛的文章。我们确定了 733 篇出版物,在去除重复项后筛选了 559 篇,并排除了 533 篇。在剩余的 26 篇全文文章中,有 8 篇因各种原因被排除在外,其余 18 篇进行了详细分析。对 25 个独立数据集(11 个手术刀,11 个非手术刀,3 个其他/混合)进行了荟萃分析。研究随访时间从 2 周到 37 年不等,样本量从 12 例到 723 例不等。术后疼痛的总体发生率为 15%(95%CI 9%-25%)。手术刀和非手术刀技术术后疼痛的发生率分别为 24%(95%CI 15%-36%)和 7%(95%CI 4%-13%)。5%(95%CI 3%-8%)的受试者发生了输精管切除术后疼痛综合征,两种技术的估计值相似。我们的结论是,与先前的报告相比,输精管切除术后疼痛的总体发生率更高,与非手术刀输精管切除术相比,传统手术刀输精管切除术的疼痛发生率高出三倍,而输精管切除术后疼痛综合征的发生率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/07f08be39c6b/ijerph-17-01788-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/ebb6f3d93dfa/ijerph-17-01788-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/2f632ecae826/ijerph-17-01788-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/07f08be39c6b/ijerph-17-01788-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/ebb6f3d93dfa/ijerph-17-01788-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/2f632ecae826/ijerph-17-01788-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0712/7084350/07f08be39c6b/ijerph-17-01788-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence of Post-Vasectomy Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输精管切除术后疼痛的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051788.
2
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub2.
3
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4.
4
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管切除术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub3.
5
A novel instrument-independent no-scalpel vasectomy - a comparative study against the standard instrument-dependent no-scalpel vasectomy.一种新型的非器械依赖型无刀输精管切除术——与标准器械依赖型无刀输精管切除术的对比研究。
Int J Androl. 2004 Aug;27(4):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2004.00475.x.
6
Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy)--a comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy.简易改良无刀输精管结扎术(经皮输精管结扎术)——与标准无刀输精管结扎术的对比研究
Contraception. 2005 Feb;71(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.018.
7
Conventional or Li vasectomy: a questionnaire study.传统输精管切除术或利多卡因输精管切除术:一项问卷调查研究。
Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79(4):596-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00390.x.
8
Comparison of Marie Stopes scalpel and electrocautery no-scalpel vasectomy techniques.玛丽斯特普斯手术刀与电灼无刀输精管结扎术技术的比较。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003 Apr;29(2):32-4. doi: 10.1783/147118903101197214.
9
[No-scalpel vasectomy].[无刀输精管切除术]
Arch Esp Urol. 1994 Sep;47(7):695-701.
10
Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.两种局部麻醉技术在接受无刀输精管结扎术男性中的有效性比较分析
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1187-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Vasectomy Procedures on the Rise in France From 2010 to 2022.2010年至2022年期间,法国的输精管切除术数量呈上升趋势。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):154-161. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70013. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Post-vasectomy Pain Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Updated Treatment Algorithm.输精管切除术后疼痛综合征:文献综述及更新的治疗方案
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79592. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门

本文引用的文献

1
Vasectomy: tips and tricks.输精管切除术:技巧与窍门。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):704-709. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.08.
2
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY AND STANDARD INCISIONAL VASECTOMY.非手术刀输精管切除术与标准切口输精管切除术的比较评估
Med J Armed Forces India. 1998 Jan;54(1):32-34. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30403-3. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
An overview of the management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome.输精管结扎术后疼痛综合征的管理概述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.
4
Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret.一种用于识别输精管结扎术后后悔风险患者的欧洲输精管结扎术前评分系统的定义。
Sex Med. 2025 Jan 23;12(6):qfae094. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae094. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Retrospective evaluation of post-surgical orchialgia in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.对接受无刀输精管结扎术的男性术后睾丸疼痛的回顾性评估。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Apr;19(4):123-126. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8937.
6
Vasectomy Discussions in South Korea: Central Themes and Public Interest on Question-and-Answer Social Platforms.韩国的输精管切除术讨论:问答社交平台上的核心主题与公众关注
Int Neurourol J. 2024 Nov;28(Suppl 2):S114-128. doi: 10.5213/inj.2448324.162. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
7
Snip, Support, and Shared Stories: Exploring Reddit Users' Experiences With Vasectomy.片段、支持与分享的故事:探索Reddit用户的输精管切除术经历
Cureus. 2024 Oct 13;16(10):e71374. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71374. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
CUA 2023 Annual Meeting Abstracts - Poster Session 10: Sexual Health, Pediatrics Sunday, June 25, 2023 • 7:00-8:30.2023年加拿大泌尿外科学会年会摘要 - 海报展示环节10:性健康,儿科 2023年6月25日(星期日)• 7:00 - 8:30
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Jun;17(6 Suppl 2):S124-S130. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8418.
9
Anti-adhesion agent to prevent of post-operative adhesion and fibrosis after vasectomy: a study using a rat model.预防输精管切除术后粘连和纤维化的抗粘连剂:一项使用大鼠模型的研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Sep;11(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-1170.
10
Gold Standard Care of Chronic Scrotal Pain.慢性阴囊疼痛的金标准护理
Res Rep Urol. 2021 May 24;13:283-288. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S278803. eCollection 2021.
Asian J Androl. 2016 May-Jun;18(3):332-7. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.175090.
4
Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data.MetaProp:用于对二项数据进行荟萃分析的 Stata 命令。
Arch Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;72(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39. eCollection 2014.
5
Common questions about vasectomy.输精管切除术常见问题。
Am Fam Physician. 2013 Dec 1;88(11):757-61.
6
Role of no scalpel vasectomy in male sterilization.无刀输精管结扎术在男性绝育中的作用。
Indian J Surg. 2012 Aug;74(4):284-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0401-8. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
7
Vasectomy.输精管切除术
BMJ. 2013 Apr 2;346:f1674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1674.
8
Predictors of no-scalpel vasectomy acceptance in Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh.安得拉邦卡里姆纳加尔区无刀输精管结扎术接受情况的预测因素
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jul;28(3):292-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.102704.
9
Vasectomy: AUA guideline.输精管切除术:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.080. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Associations of ultrasonographic features with scrotal pain after vasectomy.输精管结扎术后超声特征与阴囊疼痛的相关性。
Korean J Urol. 2011 Nov;52(11):782-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.11.782. Epub 2011 Nov 17.