• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的学校卫生:五个国家劳动力支出的综述。

School health in Europe: a review of workforce expenditure across five countries.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05077-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05077-w
PMID:32164689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most European countries have implemented a form of school health services (SHS) to provide young children and adolescents with various types of healthcare. No estimations on SHS expenditure for European countries have been published until now. We estimated SHS workforce expenditure in Europe, expected to serve as the main driver of school healthcare costs.

METHODS

Using two networks of experts on healthcare provision for children we contacted various country representatives to provide data on the number of professionals working in SHS and salaries. These data were used, together with publicly available data, to estimate annual SHS workforce expenditure on the national level.

RESULTS

We received sufficient data for five European countries, and estimated the SHS workforce expenditure. Nurses were the most widely reported professionals working in this field, followed by doctors and psychologists. Our SHS expenditure estimations ranged from €43,000 for Estonia to €195,300 in Norway (per 1000 pupils). For Norway, Estonia, Finland and Iceland, school nurses were the main drivers of SHS expenditure, mainly due to their large numbers, while in Austria, school doctors played the largest role in SHS expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

We estimated the spending on SHS workforce for five European countries, which comprises relatively minor parts of total healthcare spending (0.16 to 0.69%). Many questions regarding SHS spending in Europe remain, due to a general lack of data on national levels.

摘要

背景

大多数欧洲国家都实施了某种形式的学校卫生服务(SHS),为儿童和青少年提供各种类型的医疗保健。迄今为止,尚无关于欧洲国家 SHS 支出的估计数。我们估计了欧洲的 SHS 劳动力支出,预计这将是学校医疗保健费用的主要驱动因素。

方法

我们利用两个儿童保健供应专家网络,联系了各国代表,以提供从事 SHS 工作的专业人员人数和薪酬数据。这些数据与公开提供的数据一起,用于估算国家一级的年度 SHS 劳动力支出。

结果

我们收到了五个欧洲国家的足够数据,并估算了 SHS 劳动力支出。护士是该领域工作最广泛的专业人员,其次是医生和心理学家。我们的 SHS 支出估算范围从爱沙尼亚的 43,000 欧元到挪威的 195,300 欧元(每千名学生)。对于挪威、爱沙尼亚、芬兰和冰岛,学校护士是 SHS 支出的主要驱动因素,主要是因为他们的人数众多,而在奥地利,学校医生在 SHS 支出中发挥了最大的作用。

结论

我们估算了五个欧洲国家 SHS 劳动力支出,这占总医疗保健支出的相对较小部分(0.16 至 0.69%)。由于缺乏国家一级的数据,欧洲 SHS 支出仍存在许多问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/7d0d05f1ed3d/12913_2020_5077_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/39c7969cc434/12913_2020_5077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/c302716bc56d/12913_2020_5077_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/1da2a8251a5a/12913_2020_5077_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/7d0d05f1ed3d/12913_2020_5077_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/39c7969cc434/12913_2020_5077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/c302716bc56d/12913_2020_5077_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/1da2a8251a5a/12913_2020_5077_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaa/7068946/7d0d05f1ed3d/12913_2020_5077_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
School health in Europe: a review of workforce expenditure across five countries.欧洲的学校卫生:五个国家劳动力支出的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05077-w.
2
Mental health care and out-of-pocket expenditures in Europe: results from the ESEMeD project.欧洲的精神卫生保健与自付费用:ESEMeD项目的结果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):95-105.
3
Improving access to school health services as perceived by school professionals.学校专业人员所认为的改善学校卫生服务可及性的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2711-4.
4
Oral healthcare systems in the extended European union.扩大后的欧盟中的口腔医疗保健系统。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(3):155-94.
5
Organization and activities of school health services among EU countries.欧盟国家的学校卫生服务的组织和活动。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;31(3):502-508. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa200.
6
Spending on medicines in Israel in an international context.以色列药品支出的国际背景。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 May;7(5):286-91.
7
Cost impact of high staff turnover on primary care in remote Australia.高员工流动率对澳大利亚偏远地区初级医疗保健的成本影响。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):689-695. doi: 10.1071/AH17262.
8
Organizational models of school health services in the WHO European Region.世界卫生组织欧洲区域的学校卫生服务组织模式。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(6):733-46. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2011-0084.
9
[Assessment of the pharmaceutical expenditure in Hungary].[匈牙利药品支出评估]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2010;80(4):162-72.
10
[Real per capita health spending by age and sex in Spain (1998-2008): changes and effects on public healthcare expenditure projections].西班牙按年龄和性别划分的实际人均医疗支出(1998 - 2008年):变化及其对公共医疗支出预测的影响
Gac Sanit. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Teachers' Attitudes toward the Management of Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.探索教师对1型糖尿病管理的态度:一项定性研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Sep 28;2023:6607310. doi: 10.1155/2023/6607310. eCollection 2023.
2
Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study.关联校医干预与健康检查益处:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001394.
3
Effectiveness of health education intervention on diabetes mellitus among the teachers working in public sector schools of Pakistan.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the effectiveness of school health services delivered by a health provider: A systematic review of systematic reviews.调查由卫生提供者提供的学校卫生服务的效果:系统评价的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0212603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212603. eCollection 2019.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of the EdAl (Educació en Alimentació) Program: A Primary School-Based Study to Prevent Childhood Obesity.教育饮食计划(EdAl)预防儿童肥胖的成本效益:基于小学的研究
J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 5;28(12):477-481. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170111. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
3
Early-life conditions and health at older ages: The mediating role of educational attainment, family and employment trajectories.
巴基斯坦公立学校教师糖尿病健康教育干预效果。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01110-7.
4
Supporting Student's Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Survey for School Nurses.支持学生心理健康:一项针对学校护士的横断面调查
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;8(2):129. doi: 10.3390/children8020129.
5
Reducing Young Schoolchildren's Intake of Sugar-Rich Food and Drinks: Study Protocol and Intervention Design for "Are You Too Sweet?" A Multicomponent 3.5-Month Cluster Randomised Family-Based Intervention Study.减少小学生含糖食物和饮料摄入量:“你太甜了吗?”一项为期 3.5 个月的多成分、基于家庭的群组随机对照干预研究的研究方案和干预设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249580.
早年生活条件与老年健康:教育程度、家庭和就业轨迹的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195320. eCollection 2018.
4
Economic opportunity, health behaviours, and health outcomes in the USA: a population-based cross-sectional study.美国的经济机会、健康行为和健康结果:基于人群的横断面研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Nov;1(1):e18-e25. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30005-6. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
5
Costs and effects of a state-wide health promotion program in primary schools in Germany - the Baden-Württemberg Study: A cluster-randomized, controlled trial.德国巴登-符腾堡州一项全州范围内小学健康促进项目的成本与效果:一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172332. eCollection 2017.
6
An Excel Spreadsheet Model for States and Districts to Assess the Cost-Benefit of School Nursing Services.一个供州和地区评估学校护理服务成本效益的Excel电子表格模型。
NASN Sch Nurse. 2016 Nov;31(6):354-363. doi: 10.1177/1942602X16659349. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Economic Evaluation of School-Based Health Centers: A Community Guide Systematic Review.基于学校的健康中心的经济评估:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.017.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief school-based group programme for parents of children at risk of ADHD: a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项针对多动症风险儿童家长的简短校内小组项目的有效性和成本效益:一项整群随机对照试验
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jul;42(4):521-33. doi: 10.1111/cch.12349.
9
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——新兴良好实践:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告2
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.