• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《内部表象问卷》:思维模式的测量

The Internal Representations Questionnaire: Measuring modes of thinking.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2053-2070. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01354-y.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01354-y
PMID:32166609
Abstract

Does the format in which we experience our moment-to-moment thoughts vary from person to person? Many people claim that their thinking takes place in an inner voice and that using language outside of interpersonal communication is a regular experience for them. Other people disagree. We present a novel measure, the Internal Representation Questionnaire (IRQ) designed to assess people's subjective mode of internal representations, and to quantify individual differences in "modes of thinking" along multiple factors in a single questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors: Internal Verbalization, Visual Imagery, Orthographic Imagery, and Representational Manipulation. All four factors were positively correlated with one another, but accounted for unique predictions. We describe the properties of the IRQ and report a test of its ability to predict patterns of interference in a speeded word-picture verification task. Taken together, the results suggest that self-reported differences in how people internally represent their thoughts relates to differences in processing familiar images and written words.

摘要

我们体验瞬间思维的方式是否因人而异?许多人声称他们的思维是以内心声音的形式进行的,并且对于他们来说,在人际交流之外使用语言是一种常见的体验。其他人则不同意。我们提出了一种新的测量方法,即内部表象问卷(IRQ),旨在评估人们主观的内部表象模式,并在单个问卷中量化“思维模式”在多个因素上的个体差异。探索性因素分析确定了四个因素:内部言语化、视觉表象、正字法表象和表象操作。这四个因素彼此之间呈正相关,但可以做出独特的预测。我们描述了 IRQ 的特性,并报告了一项测试,以检验其在快速单词-图片验证任务中的干扰模式预测能力。总之,研究结果表明,人们自我报告的内部思维方式的差异与处理熟悉的图像和书面文字的差异有关。

相似文献

1
The Internal Representations Questionnaire: Measuring modes of thinking.《内部表象问卷》:思维模式的测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2053-2070. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01354-y.
2
The effects of internal representations on performance and fluidity in a motor task.内部表象对运动任务中表现和流畅性的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01912-x. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
Spontaneous cognition in dysphoria: reduced positive bias in imagining the future.烦躁情绪中的自发认知:对未来想象的积极偏差减少。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jun;83(4):817-831. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1071-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
Orienting attention to visual or verbal/auditory imagery differentially impairs the processing of visual stimuli.将注意力集中在视觉或言语/听觉意象上会对视觉刺激的处理产生不同程度的影响。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
An asymmetrical relationship between verbal and visual thinking: Converging evidence from behavior and fMRI.言语思维与视觉思维之间的不对称关系:来自行为学和功能磁共振成像的汇聚证据。
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Memory retrieval effects as a function of differences in phenomenal experience.作为现象学体验差异函数的记忆提取效应。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Oct;18(5):943-950. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00892-9. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Is visual thinking "imageless thought"?视觉思维是“无形象的思维”吗?
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):981-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.3.981.
8
Individual differences in encoded neural representations within cortical speech production network.皮质言语产生网络中编码神经表示的个体差异。
Brain Res. 2020 Jan 1;1726:146483. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146483. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Inter-participant consistency of language-processing networks during abstract thoughts.参与者间语言处理网络在抽象思维过程中的一致性。
Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116626. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116626. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
The functional significance of EEG microstates--Associations with modalities of thinking.脑电图微状态的功能意义——与思维模式的关联
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:643-656. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.023. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Talk: Emotional Inner Speech Increases Heart Rate.内心对话:情绪性内心言语会提高心率。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Sep;62(9):e70138. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70138.
2
Individual differences in wellbeing are supported by separable sets of co-active self- and visual-attention-related brain networks.幸福感的个体差异由相互作用的自我和视觉注意相关脑网络的可分离集合所支持。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86762-w.
3
NEBULA101: an open dataset for the study of language aptitude in behaviour, brain structure and function.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Frequency of Inner-Experience Characteristics by Self-Report: The Nevada Inner Experience Questionnaire.通过自我报告测量内在体验特征的频率:内华达内在体验问卷
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 11;9:2615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02615. eCollection 2018.
2
The varieties of inner speech questionnaire - Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology.内言语问卷修订版(VISQ-R):内言语与精神病理学之间联系的复制与完善。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
How Language Programs the Mind.
星云101:一个用于研究行为、大脑结构和功能方面语言能力的开放数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jan 6;12(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-04357-y.
4
Memory retrieval effects as a function of differences in phenomenal experience.作为现象学体验差异函数的记忆提取效应。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Oct;18(5):943-950. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00892-9. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Inner speech in the daily lives of people with aphasia.失语症患者日常生活中的内心言语。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1335425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335425. eCollection 2024.
6
The effects of internal representations on performance and fluidity in a motor task.内部表象对运动任务中表现和流畅性的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01912-x. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
The psychometric properties of the Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire-Revised in Hebrew.希伯来语修订版内心言语问卷的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:1092223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1092223. eCollection 2022.
语言如何塑造思维。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;8(2):408-24. doi: 10.1111/tops.12155. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.学习风格:概念与证据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
5
Styles of Learning and Thinking Matter in Instruction and Assessment.学习和思维风格在教学和评估中很重要。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;3(6):486-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00095.x.
6
What makes words special? Words as unmotivated cues.是什么让单词与众不同?作为无动机线索的单词。
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Lives without imagery - Congenital aphantasia.没有意象的生活——先天性想象缺失症。
Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:378-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Words Jump-Start Vision: A Label Advantage in Object Recognition.词语助力视觉:物体识别中的标签优势
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 24;35(25):9329-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5111-14.2015.
9
Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology.内部言语:发展、认知功能、现象学与神经生物学
Psychol Bull. 2015 Sep;141(5):931-65. doi: 10.1037/bul0000021. Epub 2015 May 25.
10
Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking.走向内在言说的现象学。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Dec;22(4):1477-94. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 31.