社区治疗令：国际视角
Community treatment orders: international perspective.
作者信息
Mikellides Georgios, Stefani Artemis, Tantele Marianna
机构信息
University of Maastricht, the Netherlands. Email
Centre for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cyprus.
出版信息
BJPsych Int. 2019 Nov;16(4):83-86. doi: 10.1192/bji.2019.4.
Abstract
The use of community treatment orders (CTOs) is available in more than 70 jurisdictions around the world. Although CTOs are used extensively, their effectiveness remains doubtful. We comment on the existing evidence and focus on components that influence the outcomes of CTOs internationally. It is essential to identify factors that affect the delivery of CTOs, and mixed methodologies may improve our understanding regarding their efficiency.
摘要
全球70多个司法管辖区都有社区治疗令（CTO）的使用。尽管CTO被广泛应用，但其有效性仍存疑问。我们对现有证据进行评论，并聚焦于在国际上影响CTO结果的因素。识别影响CTO实施的因素至关重要，混合方法可能会增进我们对其效率的理解。
相似文献
1
Community treatment orders: international perspective.
BJPsych Int. 2019 Nov;16(4):83-86. doi: 10.1192/bji.2019.4.
2
How shortcomings in the mental health system affect the use of involuntary community treatment orders.
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):351-356. doi: 10.1071/AH16074.
3
Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: The International Evidence.
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;61(1):15-24. doi: 10.1177/0706743715620415. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
4
Latest findings highlight the continuing uncertainty over the utility of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community.
BJPsych Open. 2024 Jul 30;10(5):e133. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.718.
5
Rates of use of community treatment orders in Australia.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
What Clinicians Say About the Experience of Working With Individuals on Community Treatment Orders.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):791-796. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700492. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
The subjective experience of community treatment orders: patients' views and clinical correlations.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;60(5):474-81. doi: 10.1177/0020764013498870. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
8
Examining the health and criminal justice characteristics for young people on compulsory community treatment orders: An Australian birth cohort and data linkage study.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Jul-Aug;83:101813. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101813. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Community treatment orders and Nova Scotia--the least restrictive alternative?
Health Law J. 2003;11:1-33.
引用本文的文献
1
Ten Years of Community Treatment Orders in Western Switzerland: an Update.
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01486-5.
2
A hybrid fuzzy logic-Random Forest model to predict psychiatric treatment order outcomes: an interpretable tool for legal decision support.
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 17;8:1606250. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1606250. eCollection 2025.
3
Strategies to promote treatment compliance: a grounded theory study with relatives of people with a serious mental health condition.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05907-9.
4
Ethical Issues in Clinical Decision-Making about Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment: A Scoping Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;12(4):445. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040445.
5
Use of compulsory community treatment in mental healthcare: An integrative review of stakeholders' opinions.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 3;13:1011961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1011961. eCollection 2022.
6
The Right to Health as a Tool of Social Control: Compulsory Treatment Orders by Courts in Brazil.
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):159-169.
本文引用的文献
1
The use of community treatment orders in competent patients is not justified.
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):311-312. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193920.
2
Associations between compulsory community treatment and continuity of care in a three year follow-up of the Oxford Community Treatment Order Trial (OCTET) cohort.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1319-x.
3
Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):147-157. doi: 10.1111/inm.12304. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
"Life on hold": a qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in two norwegian counties.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Mar;36(3):209-16. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.955933.
5
Is there a place for community treatment orders after the OCTET study?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):330-2. doi: 10.1111/acps.12376. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
Arrest outcomes associated with outpatient commitment in New York State.
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):504-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0504.
8
How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders.
J Ment Health. 2005;14(4):357-68. doi: 10.1080/09638230500229541.
9
Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):271-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033720.
10
Do community treatment orders for mental illness reduce readmission to hospital? An epidemiological study.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;41(7):574-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0063-1. Epub 2006 May 9.
Zotero 插件