• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区治疗令:国际视角

Community treatment orders: international perspective.

作者信息

Mikellides Georgios, Stefani Artemis, Tantele Marianna

机构信息

University of Maastricht, the Netherlands. Email

Centre for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cyprus.

出版信息

BJPsych Int. 2019 Nov;16(4):83-86. doi: 10.1192/bji.2019.4.

DOI:10.1192/bji.2019.4
PMID:32167079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7054326/
Abstract

The use of community treatment orders (CTOs) is available in more than 70 jurisdictions around the world. Although CTOs are used extensively, their effectiveness remains doubtful. We comment on the existing evidence and focus on components that influence the outcomes of CTOs internationally. It is essential to identify factors that affect the delivery of CTOs, and mixed methodologies may improve our understanding regarding their efficiency.

摘要

全球70多个司法管辖区都有社区治疗令(CTO)的使用。尽管CTO被广泛应用,但其有效性仍存疑问。我们对现有证据进行评论,并聚焦于在国际上影响CTO结果的因素。识别影响CTO实施的因素至关重要,混合方法可能会增进我们对其效率的理解。

相似文献

1
Community treatment orders: international perspective.社区治疗令:国际视角
BJPsych Int. 2019 Nov;16(4):83-86. doi: 10.1192/bji.2019.4.
2
How shortcomings in the mental health system affect the use of involuntary community treatment orders.心理健康系统中的缺陷如何影响非自愿社区治疗令的使用。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):351-356. doi: 10.1071/AH16074.
3
Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: The International Evidence.社区治疗令的有效性:国际证据
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;61(1):15-24. doi: 10.1177/0706743715620415. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
4
Latest findings highlight the continuing uncertainty over the utility of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community.最新研究结果凸显了社区强制精神治疗效用方面持续存在的不确定性。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Jul 30;10(5):e133. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.718.
5
Rates of use of community treatment orders in Australia.澳大利亚社区治疗令的使用情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
What Clinicians Say About the Experience of Working With Individuals on Community Treatment Orders.临床医生对与社区治疗令个体合作的体验的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):791-796. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700492. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
The subjective experience of community treatment orders: patients' views and clinical correlations.社区治疗令的主观体验:患者的观点和临床相关性。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;60(5):474-81. doi: 10.1177/0020764013498870. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
8
Examining the health and criminal justice characteristics for young people on compulsory community treatment orders: An Australian birth cohort and data linkage study.检查接受强制性社区治疗令的年轻人的健康和刑事司法特征:澳大利亚出生队列和数据链接研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Jul-Aug;83:101813. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101813. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.瑞士西部的社区治疗令:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Community treatment orders and Nova Scotia--the least restrictive alternative?社区治疗令与新斯科舍省——限制最少的选择?
Health Law J. 2003;11:1-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten Years of Community Treatment Orders in Western Switzerland: an Update.瑞士西部社区治疗令十年:最新情况
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01486-5.
2
A hybrid fuzzy logic-Random Forest model to predict psychiatric treatment order outcomes: an interpretable tool for legal decision support.一种用于预测精神科治疗顺序结果的混合模糊逻辑-随机森林模型:一种用于法律决策支持的可解释工具。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 17;8:1606250. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1606250. eCollection 2025.
3
Strategies to promote treatment compliance: a grounded theory study with relatives of people with a serious mental health condition.促进治疗依从性的策略:一项基于严重精神健康状况患者亲属的扎根理论研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05907-9.
4
Ethical Issues in Clinical Decision-Making about Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment: A Scoping Review.关于非自愿精神科治疗临床决策中的伦理问题:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;12(4):445. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040445.
5
Use of compulsory community treatment in mental healthcare: An integrative review of stakeholders' opinions.精神卫生保健中强制社区治疗的使用:利益相关者意见的综合综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 3;13:1011961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1011961. eCollection 2022.
6
The Right to Health as a Tool of Social Control: Compulsory Treatment Orders by Courts in Brazil.健康权作为社会控制工具:巴西法院的强制治疗令。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):159-169.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of community treatment orders in competent patients is not justified.在有能力的患者中使用社区治疗令是没有道理的。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):311-312. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193920.
2
Associations between compulsory community treatment and continuity of care in a three year follow-up of the Oxford Community Treatment Order Trial (OCTET) cohort.牛津社区治疗令试验(OCTET)队列三年随访中强制社区治疗与连续护理之间的关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1319-x.
3
Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods.挪威的康复理念将通过积极社区治疗模式和混合方法进行检验。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):147-157. doi: 10.1111/inm.12304. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
"Life on hold": a qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in two norwegian counties.“生活暂停”:对挪威两个郡门诊强制治疗患者经历的定性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Mar;36(3):209-16. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.955933.
5
Is there a place for community treatment orders after the OCTET study?在OCTET研究之后,社区治疗令还有存在的空间吗?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):330-2. doi: 10.1111/acps.12376. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.社区治疗令对精神病患者的影响(OCTET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
Arrest outcomes associated with outpatient commitment in New York State.纽约州门诊强制治疗的逮捕结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):504-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0504.
8
How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders.新西兰患者如何看待社区治疗令。
J Ment Health. 2005;14(4):357-68. doi: 10.1080/09638230500229541.
9
Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?监督下的社区治疗在伦理上是否合理?
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):271-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033720.
10
Do community treatment orders for mental illness reduce readmission to hospital? An epidemiological study.针对精神疾病的社区治疗令能否降低再次入院率?一项流行病学研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;41(7):574-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0063-1. Epub 2006 May 9.