• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴支持作为解决结直肠癌筛查中种族/民族差异的理想方案:系统评价和荟萃分析的证据。

Peer Support as an Ideal Solution for Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):850-858. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001611.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001611
PMID:32167969
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low implementation of colorectal cancer screening in ethnic minorities is the main reason for racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Peer support is widely used for promoting health care in ethnic minorities. However, whether it improves their acceptance to undergo the screening remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis of the currently available studies to further explore its effectiveness.

DATA SOURCES

This meta-analysis was undertaken using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO for randomized controlled trials.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that compared peer support interventions among ethnic minorities versus other interventions to promote uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 8090 participants met the eligibility criteria. Peer support intervention can increase colorectal cancer screening implementation and raise awareness and intention to undergo the screening in ethnic minorities more significantly than fecal occult blood test outreach, print, and usual care. Subgroup analysis showed that peer support intervention achieved great results in Asian Americans and intervention of peer counseling.

LIMITATIONS

The results of subgroup analysis had substantial heterogeneity, which may decrease the precision of our estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer support can significantly improve the awareness about and the intention for receiving colorectal cancer screening in ethnic minorities and is an ideal choice for promoting the screening among ethnic minorities, particularly in a diverse community. Peer support intervention is recommended to promote the implementation of screening in Asian Americans. Peer counseling is worth promoting; however, church-based peer counseling programs require enhanced management to maintain their fidelity.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌筛查在少数民族中的实施率较低,是导致结直肠癌发病率和死亡率存在种族和民族差异的主要原因。同伴支持被广泛用于促进少数民族的医疗保健。然而,它是否能提高他们接受筛查的意愿仍存在争议。

目的

我们对现有的研究进行了荟萃分析,以进一步探讨其效果。

资料来源

本荟萃分析使用了 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、护理和联合健康文献累积索引以及 PsycINFO,检索了随机对照试验。

研究选择

我们纳入了比较同伴支持干预与少数民族其他干预措施以促进结直肠癌筛查接受率的研究。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究共有 13 项,涉及 8090 名参与者。与粪便潜血试验外展、印刷品和常规护理相比,同伴支持干预能更显著地增加结直肠癌筛查的实施率,并提高少数民族对筛查的认识和意愿。亚组分析显示,同伴支持干预在亚裔美国人和同伴咨询干预中取得了很好的效果。

局限性

亚组分析的结果存在很大的异质性,可能会降低我们估计的准确性。

结论

同伴支持可以显著提高少数民族对结直肠癌筛查的认识和接受意愿,是促进少数民族进行筛查的理想选择,特别是在多元化的社区中。建议采用同伴支持干预来促进亚裔美国人的筛查实施。同伴咨询值得推广;然而,基于教会的同伴咨询计划需要加强管理以保持其保真度。

相似文献

1
Peer Support as an Ideal Solution for Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.同伴支持作为解决结直肠癌筛查中种族/民族差异的理想方案:系统评价和荟萃分析的证据。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):850-858. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001611.
2
Effectiveness of Community Health Worker-Led Interventions in Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.社区卫生工作者主导的干预措施在提高少数民族人群结直肠癌筛查参与度方面的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Nurs. 2024;47(5):368-376. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001222. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
A family-based multimedia intervention to enhance the uptake of colorectal cancer screening among older South Asian adults in Hong Kong: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于家庭的多媒体干预措施提高香港老年南亚裔成年人结直肠癌筛查参与度的研究方案:一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6995-7.
4
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials on interventions aimed at promoting colorectal cancer screening amongst ethnic minorities.系统评价少数民族结直肠癌筛查干预措施的随机对照试验。
Ethn Health. 2023 Jul;28(5):661-695. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2139815. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Cluster Randomized Trial of a Church-Based Peer Counselor and Tailored Newsletter Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening and Physical Activity Among Older African Americans.一项基于教会的同伴咨询员和定制时事通讯干预措施的整群随机试验,旨在促进老年非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查和体育活动。
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Oct;43(5):568-76. doi: 10.1177/1090198115611877. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial.提高低收入、种族多样化人群结直肠癌筛查率的项目:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1381.
7
Racial minorities are more likely than whites to report lack of provider recommendation for colon cancer screening.与白人相比,少数族裔更有可能报告缺乏医疗服务提供者对结肠癌筛查的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;110(10):1388-94. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.138. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.改善少数民族与结直肠癌相关的护理干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1033-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2044-2.
9
Cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment interventions for racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.针对少数民族的宫颈癌筛查、诊断和治疗干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1016-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2052-2.
10
Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.邮寄外展服务优于美国常规护理单独用于结直肠癌筛查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Sep;64(9):2489-2496. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05587-6. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Structured Peer Support Intervention for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Peer Support Interventionists' Perspectives.一项针对接受造血干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的结构化同伴支持干预:同伴支持干预者的观点。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.03.017.
2
A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods.一项针对接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的同伴支持干预措施:STEPP随机试点试验的设计与方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jan;148:107746. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107746. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Transitional care programs to improve the post-discharge experience of patients with multiple chronic conditions and co-occurring serious mental illness: A scoping review.
改善患有多种慢性病和并发严重精神疾病患者出院后体验的过渡性护理计划:一项范围综述。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Nov-Dec;91:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Preferences for Peer Support Amongst Families Engaged in Paediatric Screening Programmes: The Perspectives of Parents Involved in Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Children Aged 3-13.参与儿科筛查项目的家庭对同伴支持的偏好:参与 3-13 岁儿童 1 型糖尿病筛查的家长的观点。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e70007. doi: 10.1111/hex.70007.
5
Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.美国结直肠癌筛查的流行率和预测因素:来自 2018 年至 2020 年 HINTS 数据库的证据。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01795-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Towards evidence-based and inclusive models of peer support for long covid: A hermeneutic systematic review.迈向基于证据和包容的长新冠同伴支持模式:诠释学系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;320:115669. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115669. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
8
Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews.同伴教育和同伴咨询对健康和幸福的影响:综述研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 17;19(10):6064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106064.
9
Improving our model of cascade testing for hereditary cancer risk by leveraging patient peer support: a concept report.通过利用患者同伴支持来改进我们的遗传性癌症风险级联检测模型:概念报告。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 26;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00198-7.
10
The SWIM study: Ethnic minority women's ideas and preferences for a tailored intervention to promote national cancer screening programmes-A qualitative interview study.SWIM 研究:少数民族妇女对促进国家癌症筛查计划的定制干预措施的想法和偏好——一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1692-1700. doi: 10.1111/hex.13309. Epub 2021 Jul 7.