Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jun 1;35(6):1520-1526. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003573.
Bartolomei, S, Nigro, F, Malagoli Lanzoni, I, Masina, F, Di Michele, R, and Hoffman, JR. A comparison between total body and split routine resistance training programs in trained men. J Strength Cond Res 35(6): 1520-1526, 2021-The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effects of total body (TB) versus split routine (SR) resistance training workouts on maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy in trained men. Twenty-one resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to either a TB (TB: age = 24.1 ± 4.4 years; body mass = 78.7 ± 11.3 kg; body height = 177.0 ± 3.9 cm) or the SR group (SR: age = 24.9 ± 4.2 years; body mass = 79.2 ± 9.5 kg; body height = 175.2 ± 6.0 cm). Both groups performed a 10-week resistance training program. Isokinetic bench press at 75 and 25 cm·s-1 (ISOK75 and ISOK25, respectively), isometric bench press (ISOBP), isometric squat (ISOSQ), and one repetition maximum BP and SQ assessments were performed before and after training. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major (PECMT), superior part of trapezius (TRAPMT), and vastus lateralis (VLMT) muscles was also evaluated at the same timepoints using ultrasonography. Improvements were observed in both groups for all strength assessments and muscle thicknesses. Only changes in ISOK25 were significantly (p = 0.015) greater in TB than in SR, while significantly greater (p = 0.037) changes in VLMT were detected in SR compared with TB. Results indicated that a TB training paradigm may be more appropriate for maximal strength improvement, while an SR training protocol may be more optimal in stimulating muscle growth in experienced, resistance-trained men.
巴尔托洛梅伊、尼格罗、马拉戈利·兰佐尼、马西纳、迪米凯莱和霍夫曼。全身与分部常规抗阻训练方案在训练有素男性中的比较。《力量与调节研究杂志》35（6）：1520-1526，2021.本研究旨在比较全身（TB）与分部常规（SR）抗阻训练方案对训练有素男性最大力量和肌肉肥大的影响。21 名抗阻训练男性被随机分配至 TB 组（TB：年龄=24.1±4.4 岁；体重=78.7±11.3kg；身高=177.0±3.9cm）或 SR 组（SR：年龄=24.9±4.2 岁；体重=79.2±9.5kg；身高=175.2±6.0cm）。两组均进行 10 周抗阻训练。在训练前后进行等速 75cm·s-1（ISOK75）和 25cm·s-1（ISOK25）的卧推、等长卧推（ISOBP）、等长深蹲（ISOSQ）和 1 次重复最大卧推和深蹲评估。同时使用超声评估胸大肌（PECMT）、上斜方肌（TRAPMT）和股外侧肌（VLMT）的肌肉厚度。两组的所有力量评估和肌肉厚度均有改善。仅 TB 组 ISOK25 的变化显著大于 SR 组（p=0.015），而 SR 组 VLMT 的变化显著大于 TB 组（p=0.037）。结果表明，TB 训练方案可能更适合最大力量的提高，而 SR 训练方案可能更适合经验丰富的抗阻训练男性的肌肉生长。
