• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优秀游泳运动员与皮划艇运动员上肢推和拉力量与功率表现的比较。

A Comparison between Elite Swimmers and Kayakers on Upper Body Push and Pull Strength and Power Performance.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228301.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17228301
PMID:33182691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7697725/
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the load-power curve expressed at bench press (PR) and prone bench pull (PU) between elite swimmers and kayakers. Another aim was to calculate the strength and power PR/PU ratio in the same populations. Fifteen elite swimmers (SW: age = 23.8 ± 2.9 y; body mass = 82.8 ± 5.6 kg; body height = 184.1 ± 4.6 cm) and 13 elite kayakers (KA: age = 23.8 ± 2.9 y; body mass = 91.0 ± 3.5 kg; body height = 180.1 ± 5.4 cm) were assessed for PR 1RM and PU 1RM. They were then assessed for power produced at 40, 60 and 80% of 1RM in both PR and PU. The area under the load-power curve (AUC) and PR/PU ratios were calculated for both the SW and KA groups. The KA group showed significantly higher PR1RM (+18.2%; = 0.002) and PU1RM (+25.7%; < 0.001) compared to the SW group. Significant group differences were also detected for PUAUC ( < 0.001) and for the PR/PU power ratio ( < 0.001). No significant group differences were detected for PRAUC ( = 0.605) and for the PR/PU strength ratio ( = 0.065; 0.87 and 0.82 in SW and KA, respectively). The present findings indicate that elite KA were stronger and more powerful than elite SW in the upper body. Not consistently with other athletic populations, both KA and SW athletes were stronger and more powerful in upper body pull compared to push moves.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较优秀游泳运动员和皮划艇运动员在卧推(PR)和俯姿卧拉(PU)中的负荷-功率曲线。另一个目的是计算同一人群中 PR 和 PU 的力量和功率比。15 名优秀游泳运动员(SW:年龄=23.8±2.9 岁;体重=82.8±5.6 公斤;身高=184.1±4.6 厘米)和 13 名优秀皮划艇运动员(KA:年龄=23.8±2.9 岁;体重=91.0±3.5 公斤;身高=180.1±5.4 厘米)评估了 PR1RM 和 PU1RM。然后,他们在 PR 和 PU 中以 1RM 的 40%、60%和 80%评估了产生的功率。为 SW 和 KA 组计算了负荷-功率曲线下面积(AUC)和 PR/PU 比值。与 SW 组相比,KA 组的 PR1RM(+18.2%;=0.002)和 PU1RM(+25.7%;<0.001)显著更高。还检测到了 PUAUC(<0.001)和 PR/PU 功率比(<0.001)的显著组间差异。没有检测到 PRAUC(=0.605)和 PR/PU 力量比(=0.065;SW 和 KA 分别为 0.87 和 0.82)的显著组间差异。本研究结果表明,与优秀游泳运动员相比,优秀皮划艇运动员在上半身更强壮、更有力。与其他运动人群不一致的是,与推类动作相比,皮划艇和游泳运动员在上半身拉类动作中更强壮、更有力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/6da8bda0a9a8/ijerph-17-08301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/1a0e1eb3c9bd/ijerph-17-08301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/61d72c579060/ijerph-17-08301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/6da8bda0a9a8/ijerph-17-08301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/1a0e1eb3c9bd/ijerph-17-08301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/61d72c579060/ijerph-17-08301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895b/7697725/6da8bda0a9a8/ijerph-17-08301-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison between Elite Swimmers and Kayakers on Upper Body Push and Pull Strength and Power Performance.优秀游泳运动员与皮划艇运动员上肢推和拉力量与功率表现的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228301.
2
Maximal Upper-Body Strength and Oxygen Uptake Are Associated With Performance in High-Level 200-m Sprint Kayakers.最大上肢力量和氧气摄取量与高水平 200 米激流皮划艇运动员的表现相关。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3186-3192. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002398.
3
The influence of upper-body strength on flat-water sprint kayak performance in elite athletes.上肢力量对优秀赛艇运动员静水短距离划艇成绩的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Jul;9(4):707-14. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0301. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
4
An Assessment of the Ratio between Upper Body Push and Pull Strength in Female and Male Elite Swedish Track and Field Throwers.瑞典男女优秀田径投掷运动员上半身推拉力比率的评估
Sports (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):201. doi: 10.3390/sports12080201.
5
Comparison Between Bench Press Throw and Ballistic Push-up Tests to Assess Upper-Body Power in Trained Individuals.比较卧推投掷和弹道俯卧撑测试,以评估训练有素个体的上肢力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jun;32(6):1503-1510. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002571.
6
Comparison of anthropometry, upper-body strength, and lower-body power characteristics in different levels of Australian football players.不同水平澳大利亚足球运动员的人体测量学、上肢力量和下肢功率特征比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Mar;29(3):826-34. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000682.
7
Differences in Left Ventricular Function at Rest and during Isometric Handgrip Exercise in Elite Aquatic Sport Athletes.优秀水上运动运动员在静息和等长握力运动时左心室功能的差异。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Mar 1;54(3):507-516. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002812.
8
Kinematics and kinetics of the bench-press and bench-pull exercises in a strength-trained sporting population.力量训练的运动员群体中卧推和卧拉练习的运动学与动力学
Sports Biomech. 2009 Sep;8(3):245-54. doi: 10.1080/14763140903229484.
9
Body Composition and Dietary Intake Profiles of Elite Iranian Swimmers and Water Polo Athletes.优秀伊朗游泳运动员和水球运动员的身体成分和饮食摄入特征。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 24;16(15):2393. doi: 10.3390/nu16152393.
10
In-Season Strength Training in Elite Junior Swimmers: The Role of the Low-Volume, High-Velocity Training on Swimming Performance.精英青少年游泳运动员的赛季中力量训练:低训练量、高速度训练对游泳成绩的作用。
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:71-84. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0015. eCollection 2020 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison Between Total Body and Split Routine Resistance Training Programs in Trained Men.在训练有素的男性中,全身和分部常规阻力训练方案的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jun 1;35(6):1520-1526. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003573.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test.等长俯姿卧推测试的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;41(8):520-527. doi: 10.1055/a-1103-2173. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Dry-Land Resistance Training Practices of Elite Swimming Strength and Conditioning Coaches.优秀游泳力量与体能教练的陆上抗阻训练实践。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Sep;32(9):2592-2600. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002599.
4
Relationship Between Dryland Strength and Swimming Performance: Pull-Up Mechanics as a Predictor of Swimming Speed.旱地力量与游泳表现的关系:引体向上力学作为游泳速度的预测指标。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jun;32(6):1637-1642. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002037.
5
Comparison Between Bench Press Throw and Ballistic Push-up Tests to Assess Upper-Body Power in Trained Individuals.比较卧推投掷和弹道俯卧撑测试,以评估训练有素个体的上肢力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jun;32(6):1503-1510. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002571.
6
Mechanical power, thrust power and propelling efficiency: relationships with elite sprint swimming performance.机械功率、推力功率与推进效率:与优秀短距离游泳成绩的关系
J Sports Sci. 2018 Mar;36(5):506-512. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1322214. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
The influence of isometric preload on power expressed during bench press in strength-trained men.等长预负荷对力量训练男性卧推时所表现出的功率的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Mar;17(2):195-199. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1222000. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
A Correlational Analysis of Tethered Swimming, Swim Sprint Performance and Dry-land Power Assessments.束缚式游泳、短距离游泳成绩与陆地力量评估的相关性分析
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;37(3):211-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559694. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes.传统周期与板块周期力量训练方案在训练有素运动员中的对比。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):990-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000366.
10
The influence of upper-body strength on flat-water sprint kayak performance in elite athletes.上肢力量对优秀赛艇运动员静水短距离划艇成绩的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Jul;9(4):707-14. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0301. Epub 2013 Nov 14.