• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险分析指数评估的虚弱与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的长期死亡相关。

Frailty as measured by the Risk Analysis Index is associated with long-term death after carotid endarterectomy.

机构信息

Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco - East Bay, Oakland, Calif.

Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1735-1742.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.043
PMID:32169359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10712269/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The role of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) continues to be debated in the age of optimal medical therapy, particularly for patients with limited life expectancy. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) measures frailty, a syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve, which increases vulnerability to adverse outcomes. The RAI better predicts surgical complications, nonhome discharge, and death than age or comorbidities alone. We sought to measure the association of frailty, as measured by the RAI, with postoperative in-hospital stroke, long-term stroke, and long-term survival after CEA. We also sought to determine how postoperative stroke interacts with frailty to alter survival trajectory after CEA.

METHODS

We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative CEA procedure and long-term data sets (2003-2017) for elective CEAs with complete RAI case information. For all analyses, the cohort was divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis. Scoring was defined as not frail (RAI <30), frail (RAI 30-34), and very frail (RAI ≥35). Mortality information through December 2017 was obtained from the Social Security Death Index. Multivariable models (logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions) were used to study the association of frail and very frail patients with the outcomes of interest. In a post hoc analysis, we created Kaplan-Meier curves to analyze patient mortality after CEA as well as after postoperative stroke.

RESULTS

Of the 42,869 included patients, 17,092 (39.9%) were female, and 38,395 (89.6%) were white. There were 25,673 (59.9%) patients assigned to the asymptomatic stenosis group and 17,196 (40.1%) patients in the symptomatic stenosis group. Frailty was not associated with perioperative or long-term postoperative stroke. The risk of long-term mortality was significantly higher for frail (hazard ratio, 1.9 [1.7-2.3]) and very frail (hazard ratio, 3.1 [2.6-3.7]) asymptomatic patients; symptomatic frail and very frail patients also had a two to three times increased risk of long-term mortality. Frail and very frail patients had two to three times the risk for long-term mortality compared with patients who were not frail. Postoperative stroke negatively affected the mortality trajectory for all patients in the cohort, regardless of frailty status.

CONCLUSIONS

RAI score is not associated with postoperative stroke; however, frail and very frail status is associated with decreased long-term survival in an incremental fashion based on increasing RAI. RAI assessment should be considered in the preoperative decision-making for patients undergoing CEA to ensure long-term survival and optimal surgical outcomes vs medical management.

摘要

目的

在最佳药物治疗时代,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的作用仍存在争议,尤其是对于预期寿命有限的患者。风险分析指数(RAI)衡量虚弱,即生理储备减少的综合征,这增加了对不良后果的脆弱性。RAI 比年龄或合并症更能准确预测手术并发症、非家庭出院和死亡。我们试图衡量虚弱(通过 RAI 测量)与 CEA 术后院内卒中、长期卒中以及 CEA 后长期生存之间的关联。我们还试图确定术后卒中如何与虚弱相互作用,以改变 CEA 后的生存轨迹。

方法

我们在 2003-2017 年期间,从血管质量倡议(Vascular Quality Initiative)CEA 程序和长期数据集中查询了接受过完整 RAI 病例信息的选择性 CEA。在所有分析中,队列分为无症状和有症状颈动脉狭窄。评分定义为非虚弱(RAI<30)、虚弱(RAI 30-34)和非常虚弱(RAI≥35)。截至 2017 年 12 月的死亡率信息通过社会保障死亡指数获得。多变量模型(逻辑和 Cox 比例风险回归)用于研究虚弱和非常虚弱患者与感兴趣结果之间的关联。在事后分析中,我们创建了 Kaplan-Meier 曲线来分析 CEA 术后以及术后卒中后的患者死亡率。

结果

在纳入的 42869 名患者中,17092 名(39.9%)为女性,38395 名(89.6%)为白人。25673 名(59.9%)患者被分配到无症状狭窄组,17196 名(40.1%)患者被分配到有症状狭窄组。虚弱与围手术期或长期术后卒中无关。无症状虚弱(危险比,1.9[1.7-2.3])和非常虚弱(危险比,3.1[2.6-3.7])患者的长期死亡率风险显著更高;有症状虚弱和非常虚弱患者的长期死亡率风险也增加了两倍至三倍。与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱和非常虚弱患者的长期死亡率风险增加了两倍至三倍。术后卒中对队列中所有患者的死亡率轨迹都有负面影响,无论虚弱状态如何。

结论

RAI 评分与术后卒中无关;然而,虚弱和非常虚弱状态与 RAI 逐渐增加的情况下,长期生存率呈递减趋势。RAI 评估应在接受 CEA 的患者的术前决策中考虑,以确保长期生存和最佳手术结果,而非药物治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38cc/10712269/806724f7744b/nihms-1568969-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38cc/10712269/4b11c4137381/nihms-1568969-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38cc/10712269/806724f7744b/nihms-1568969-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38cc/10712269/4b11c4137381/nihms-1568969-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38cc/10712269/806724f7744b/nihms-1568969-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Frailty as measured by the Risk Analysis Index is associated with long-term death after carotid endarterectomy.风险分析指数评估的虚弱与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的长期死亡相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1735-1742.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
2
Frailty Measurement and Implications for Cerebrovascular Disease Management in a Veteran Based Population.衰弱测量及其在基于退伍军人人群的脑血管病管理中的意义。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 15.
3
Trends in mortality and postoperative complications among octogenarian patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.80 岁以上患者颈动脉内膜切除术的死亡率和术后并发症趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;78(1):132-140.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Effect of frailty syndrome on the outcomes of patients with carotid stenosis.衰弱综合征对颈动脉狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1595-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.235. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Impact of frailty on 30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction in severe carotid stenosis: Endarterectomy versus stenting.严重颈动脉狭窄患者中衰弱对 30 天内死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的影响:颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222:107469. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107469. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
6
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
7
Carotid Endarterectomy With Simultaneous Proximal Common Carotid Endovascular Intervention is Beneficial for Symptomatic Stenosis and Likely Confers No Advantage for Asymptomatic Lesions.颈动脉内膜切除术联合近端颈总动脉血管内介入治疗对症状性狭窄有益,而对无症状病变可能没有优势。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):263-279. doi: 10.1177/15385744231207014. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
8
Preoperative frailty Risk Analysis Index to stratify patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.用于对接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者进行分层的术前衰弱风险分析指数。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Impact of Frailty on Clinical Outcomes after Carotid Artery Revascularization.衰弱对颈动脉血运重建术后临床结局的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74:111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.039. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Prognostic effect of the new 5-factor modified frailty index in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia - A prospective cohort study.新型 5 因素修正虚弱指数对接受区域麻醉颈动脉内膜切除术患者的预后影响-前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.074. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty Screening Using the Risk Analysis Index: A User Guide.使用风险分析指数进行衰弱筛查:用户指南
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Mar;51(3):178-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review.术前衰弱与非心脏手术后术后并发症:系统评价。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Sep;52(9):3000605241274553. doi: 10.1177/03000605241274553.
3
Decision making in the frail vascular surgery patient: A scoping review.虚弱血管手术患者的决策制定:范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Preoperative Patient Frailty and Operative Stress With Postoperative Mortality.术前患者脆弱性和手术应激与术后死亡率的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):e194620. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4620. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
2
Variation in center-level frailty burden and the impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.中心层面衰弱负担的变化及其对择期修复腹主动脉瘤患者长期生存的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):46-55.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.074. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Association of Frailty and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Outpatient Surgery.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):224-239. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
4
The association between frailty and outcomes following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.虚弱与腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术后结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):379-388.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
Prevalence and adverse outcomes of pre-operative frailty in patients undergoing carotid artery revascularization: a meta-analysis.接受颈动脉血运重建术患者术前衰弱的患病率及不良结局:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 28;10:1297848. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1297848. eCollection 2023.
6
A Vascular Quality Initiative frailty assessment predicts postdischarge mortality in patients undergoing arterial reconstruction.血管质量倡议衰弱评估可预测动脉重建术后患者出院后的死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1325-1334.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Role of pre-operative frailty status in relation to outcome after carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review.术前虚弱状态与颈动脉内膜切除术后结局的关系:一项系统评价。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1205. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7225.
虚弱与术后并发症与择期门诊手术后非计划性再入院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330.
4
Recalibration and External Validation of the Risk Analysis Index: A Surgical Frailty Assessment Tool.风险分析指数的重新校准和外部验证:一种手术脆弱性评估工具。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):996-1005. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276.
5
Risk Prediction Tools to Improve Patient Selection for Carotid Endarterectomy Among Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.用于改善无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术患者选择的风险预测工具。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Apr 1;154(4):336-344. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5119.
6
A comparative analysis of long-term mortality after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术治疗后长期死亡率的比较分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.432. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
7
Clinical need, design, and goals for the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis trial.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉血运重建与药物治疗试验的临床需求、设计及目标
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):2-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Development of a validated model to predict 30-day stroke and 1-year survival after carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis using the Vascular Quality Initiative.利用血管质量倡议开发一个经过验证的模型,以预测无症状性狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术后30天内发生中风及1年生存率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):433-444.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.427. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Protocol of the CREST-2 clinical trials.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉血运重建与药物治疗:CREST-2临床试验方案
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(7):770-778. doi: 10.1177/1747493017706238. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Association of a Frailty Screening Initiative With Postoperative Survival at 30, 180, and 365 Days.一项衰弱筛查计划与术后30天、180天和365天生存率的关联
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):233-240. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219.