Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jul;67(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Interventions to reduce adolescent sexual risk often have modest outcomes. Understanding of the mechanisms of program effectiveness is needed to develop stronger interventions. We used a randomized controlled trial to examine mechanisms of response to two empirically supported interventions: motivational interviewing versus behavioral skills training.
A total of 262 adolescents (mean age = 15.89 years, standard deviation = 1.24; 34% female and 61% Latinx) were recruited from juvenile justice programs in the U.S.; all youth were randomized to motivational interviewing or behavioral skills training. Primary outcomes included (1) theory-based mechanisms (condom use attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and intentions measured before and immediately after the interventions); and (2) risky sexual behavior (frequency of unprotected sex) and condom use measured 3 months postintervention.
Both interventions significantly increased positive attitudes toward condom use, self-efficacy for condom use, and intentions to use condoms post-test, with no differences by condition. Neither intervention impacted norms for condom use. Both interventions significantly decreased risky sexual behavior and increased condom use at the 3-month follow-up. The pattern of associations of Theory of Planned Behavior constructs to behavior were of similar magnitude in the two groups.
The results indicate common mechanisms of action for these two interventions and support the use of transdiagnostic mechanisms of treatment impact for sexual risk reduction.
青少年面临着较高的性传播感染风险,包括 HIV。减少青少年性风险的干预措施往往效果有限。为了开发更有效的干预措施,我们需要了解项目有效性的机制。我们使用随机对照试验来检验两种经过实证支持的干预措施的反应机制:动机访谈与行为技能培训。
共有 262 名青少年(平均年龄 15.89 岁,标准差 1.24;34%为女性,61%为拉丁裔)从美国少年司法项目中招募而来;所有青少年均随机分配到动机访谈组或行为技能培训组。主要结果包括:(1)基于理论的机制(在干预前后立即测量的 condom 使用态度、规范、自我效能和意图);(2)性行为风险(未使用 condom 的性行为频率)和 condom 使用(干预后 3 个月)。
两种干预措施均显著提高了 condom 使用的积极态度、 condom 使用的自我效能感和 condom 使用的意图,且条件间无差异。两种干预措施均未影响 condom 使用规范。两种干预措施均显著降低了性行为风险,并在 3 个月随访时增加了 condom 使用。计划行为理论结构与行为的关联模式在两组中具有相似的重要性。
结果表明这两种干预措施具有共同的作用机制,并支持使用跨诊断治疗影响机制来降低性风险。