Zhao Ke, Liu Mingtong, Gu Jingjin, Mo Fan, Fu Xiaolan, Hong Liu Chang
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Neuroscience. 2020 May 1;433:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Although the recognition of facial expressions seems automatic and effortless, discrimination of expressions can still be error prone. Common errors are often due to visual similarities between some expressions (e.g., fear and surprise). However, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying such a confusion effect. To address this question, we recorded the magnetoencephalography (MEG) while participants judged facial expressions that were either easily confused with or easily distinguished from other expressions. The results showed that the fusiform face area (FFA), rather than the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), played a preponderant role in discriminating confusable facial expressions. No difference between high confusion and low confusion conditions was observed on the M170 component in either the FFA or the pSTS, whilst a difference between two conditions started to emerge in the late positive potential (LPP), with the low confusion condition eliciting a larger LPP amplitude in the FFA. In addition, the power of delta was stronger in the time window of LPP component. This confusion effect was reflected in the FFA, which might be associated with the perceptual-to-conceptual shift.
尽管对面部表情的识别似乎是自动且不费力的,但表情的辨别仍可能容易出错。常见的错误往往是由于某些表情之间在视觉上的相似性(例如,恐惧和惊讶)。然而,对于这种混淆效应背后的神经机制知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们在参与者判断那些容易与其他表情混淆或容易区分的面部表情时记录了脑磁图(MEG)。结果表明,梭状脸区(FFA)而非颞上沟后部(pSTS)在辨别可混淆面部表情中起主要作用。在FFA或pSTS中,高混淆和低混淆条件下的M170成分均未观察到差异,而在晚期正电位(LPP)中两种条件之间的差异开始显现,低混淆条件在FFA中引发更大的LPP波幅。此外,在LPP成分的时间窗口中,δ波的功率更强。这种混淆效应在FFA中得到体现,并可能与从感知到概念的转变有关。