• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨折后 3 周内进行早期椎体成形术治疗急性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折:VAPOUR 试验的亚组分析及文献复习。

Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature.

机构信息

St George and Sutherland Clinical School UNSW, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Interventional Radiology, St George Private Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2020 Jul;29(7):1606-1613. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06362-2. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-020-06362-2
PMID:32170438
Abstract

BACKGROUND

VAPOUR found vertebroplasty (V) more effective than placebo (P) in patients with severe pain and fracture duration less than 6 weeks. Exploratory analysis suggested that benefits were concentrated in the subgroup of patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. This difference may account for the three negative blinded trials that included few patients within this fracture time frame.

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of early vertebroplasty for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures within 3 weeks of fracture onset in the VAPOUR study.

METHODS

Spearman's rank log coefficients were calculated to reassess the relationship of pain reduction from vertebroplasty and fracture duration in the VAPOUR trial. We more fully report baseline and outcome data in patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration.

RESULTS

There were 46V and 47P patients with fractures ≤ 3-week duration. Baseline characteristics were similar. In total, 86 patients (41V, 45P) completed the 14-day questionnaire. The proportion of patients with reduction in pain from severe (NRS ≥ 7/10 was an inclusion requirement) to mild (NRS < 4) at 14 days was 21 (51%) V-group and 9 (20%) in the P-group (between-group difference 31 percentage points, 95% CI 12-50; p = 0.002). Early vertebroplasty provided greater reductions in mean NRS pain and Roland-Morris Disability.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of this patient subgroup from the VAPOUR trial, in the context of other randomised trial evidence, suggests clinically significant benefits from early vertebroplasty if performed within 3 weeks of fracture. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

背景

VAPOUR 研究发现,与安慰剂(P)相比,骨水泥成形术(V)对疼痛剧烈且骨折时间少于 6 周的患者更有效。探索性分析表明,该获益主要集中在骨折时间小于 3 周的亚组患者中。这一差异可能是因为纳入该骨折时间框架内患者较少的三项盲法阴性试验所致。

目的

在 VAPOUR 研究中,评估骨折后 3 周内发生的急性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折行早期椎体成形术的安全性和有效性。

方法

计算 Spearman 秩相关系数,以重新评估 VAPOUR 试验中椎体成形术缓解疼痛与骨折时间的关系。我们更全面地报告了骨折时间小于等于 3 周的患者的基线和结局数据。

结果

共有 46 例 V 组和 47 例 P 组患者骨折时间小于等于 3 周。基线特征相似。共有 86 例患者(41 例 V 组,45 例 P 组)完成了 14 天的问卷调查。在 14 天时有 21 例(51%)V 组患者和 9 例(20%)P 组患者疼痛从重度(NRS≥7/10 是纳入标准)缓解至轻度(NRS<4),两组间差异为 31 个百分点,95%可信区间为 12-50;p=0.002)。早期椎体成形术能更显著减轻平均 NRS 疼痛和 Roland-Morris 残疾评分。

结论

对 VAPOUR 试验中该患者亚组的分析,结合其他随机试验证据,提示如果在骨折后 3 周内进行,早期椎体成形术可带来有临床意义的获益。这些幻灯片可从电子补充材料中获取。

相似文献

1
Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature.骨折后 3 周内进行早期椎体成形术治疗急性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折:VAPOUR 试验的亚组分析及文献复习。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jul;29(7):1606-1613. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06362-2. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30(4):CD006349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub2.
3
Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.急性疼痛性骨质疏松性骨折椎体成形术(VAPOUR):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Apr 12;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0671-8.
4
Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.椎体成形术治疗急性疼痛性骨质疏松性骨折的安全性和有效性(VAPOUR):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial.椎体成形术与假手术治疗疼痛性急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VERTOS IV):随机假手术对照临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 May 9;361:k1551. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1551.
6
Early Vertebroplasty for Severely Painful Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Critical Review of the Literature.早期椎体成形术治疗严重疼痛性急性骨质疏松性压缩性骨折:文献综述。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Nov;46(11):1439-1446. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03348-z. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
The Effect of Early Limited Activity after Bipedicular Percutaneous Vertebroplasty to Treat Acute Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.经皮双侧椎弓根穿刺椎体成形术治疗急性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折后早期限制活动的效果。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):E31-E40.
8
Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较椎体成形术和保守治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疼痛缓解效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):455-64.
9
Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial.椎体成形术与保守治疗急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(Vertos II):一项开放标签随机试验。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
10
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND PERCUTANEOUS KYPHOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE WITH INTRAVERTEBRAL VACUUM CLEFT].经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗伴椎体内真空裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160225.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Residual Back Pain After Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体成形术后残留背痛的患病率及危险因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2266-2280. doi: 10.1111/os.70095. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
[Current surgical treatment concepts for traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with osteoporotic bone substance].[当前对于伴有骨质疏松骨质的胸腰椎创伤性骨折的外科治疗理念]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;128(3):181-191. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01525-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
3
Risk of new vertebral compression fractures and serious adverse effects after vertebroplasty: a systematic, critical review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
椎体成形术后新发椎体压缩骨折及严重不良反应的风险:一项对随机对照试验的系统、批判性综述与荟萃分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Nov 1;14(11):7848-7861. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-396. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
4
Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture - A Short Review of Orthosis and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty.骨质疏松性椎体骨折的治疗——矫形器、经皮椎体成形术和球囊后凸成形术的简要综述
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1124-1131. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346936.468. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
5
Early Vertebroplasty for Severely Painful Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Critical Review of the Literature.早期椎体成形术治疗严重疼痛性急性骨质疏松性压缩性骨折:文献综述。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Nov;46(11):1439-1446. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03348-z. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
6
A 3-year retrospective analysis of patients admitted with clinical vertebral fragility fractures across hospitals in England, UK.英国英格兰多家医院收治的有临床椎体脆性骨折患者的 3 年回顾性分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Mar;34(3):607-611. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06647-w. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
The Acute VertEbRal AugmentaTion (AVERT) study: protocol for a randomised controlled, feasibility trial of spinal medial branch nerve block in hospitalised older patients with vertebral fragility fractures.急性颈椎增强(AVERT)研究:一项在住院老年椎体脆性骨折患者中进行脊髓内侧支神经阻滞的随机对照可行性试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e059194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059194.
8
Comparison Between Hyperextension and Neutral Positions for Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Which is Best for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures?椎体成形术和后凸成形术过伸位与中立位的比较:哪种对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折最佳?
J Pain Res. 2020 Oct 7;13:2509-2518. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S268610. eCollection 2020.