Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
Chemie/Forschung und Entwicklung (WLC), RheinEnergie AG, Köln, Germany.
Electrophoresis. 2020 Jun;41(12):1045-1059. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900454. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Electrophoretic separations are of growing interest to tackle complex analytical challenges. Nevertheless, capillary electrophoresis, as the most common mode, still suffers from insufficient detection limits due to low capillary loadability. ITP is of growing interest as preconcentration method for capillary electrophoresis and is also interesting to be applied as an independent analytical method. While mass spectrometric detection is common for capillary electrophoresis, the combination of ITP with MS is still a niche technique. In this work, we want to give an overview on isotachophoretic effects in CE-MS and ITP-MS methods, as well as coupling techniques of ITP with CE-MS. The challenges and possibilities associated with mass spectrometric detection in ITP and its coupling to capillary electrophoresis are critically discussed.
电泳分离在应对复杂分析挑战方面越来越受到关注。然而,作为最常见模式的毛细管电泳由于毛细管负载能力低,仍然存在检测限不足的问题。胶束电动色谱作为毛细管电泳的预浓缩方法越来越受到关注,作为一种独立的分析方法也很有趣。虽然质谱检测是毛细管电泳的常用方法,但胶束电动色谱与质谱的结合仍然是一种利基技术。在这项工作中,我们希望概述 CE-MS 和 ITP-MS 方法中的等速电泳效应,以及 ITP 与 CE-MS 的耦合技术。本文还批判性地讨论了在 ITP 及其与毛细管电泳的耦合中进行质谱检测所面临的挑战和可能性。