• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物评估包括出院后随访对老年住院患者的干预效果和过程结果:MedBridge 试验的过程评估。

Intervention fidelity and process outcomes of medication reviews including post-discharge follow-up in older hospitalized patients: Process evaluation of the MedBridge trial.

机构信息

Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1021-1029. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13128. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/jcpt.13128
PMID:32171028
Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a growing healthcare burden worldwide. In an ongoing cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sweden (MedBridge), comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) including post-discharge follow-up have been conducted in older hospitalized patients to prevent and solve DRPs. As part of a process evaluation of the MedBridge trial, this study aimed to assess the intervention fidelity and process outcomes of the trial's interventions.

METHODS

For intervention delivery, the percentage of patients that received intervention components was calculated per study group. Process outcomes, measured in about one-third of all intervention patients, included the following: the number of identified medication discrepancies, DRPs and recommendations to solve DRPs, correction rate of discrepancies, and implementation rate of recommendations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The MedBridge trial included 2637 patients (mean age: 81 years). The percentage of intervention patients (n = 1745) that received the intended intervention components was 94%-98% during admission, and 40%-81% upon and after discharge. The percentage of control patients (n = 892) that received at least one unintended intervention component was 15%. On average, 1.1 discrepancies and 2.0 DRPs were identified in 652 intervention patients. The correction and implementation rates were 79% and 73%, respectively. Stop medication was the most frequently implemented recommendation (n = 293) and 77% of the patients had at least one corrected discrepancy or implemented recommendation.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The intervention fidelity within the MedBridge trial was high for CMRs during hospital stay and lower for intervention components upon and after discharge. The high prevalence of corrected discrepancies and implemented recommendations may explain potential effects of CMRs in the MedBridge trial.

摘要

已知和目的

药物相关问题(DRPs)是全球日益严重的医疗保健负担。在瑞典正在进行的一项集群随机对照试验(MedBridge)中,对住院老年患者进行了包括出院后随访的综合药物评估(CMRs),以预防和解决 DRPs。作为 MedBridge 试验过程评估的一部分,本研究旨在评估试验干预措施的干预保真度和过程结果。

方法

对于干预措施的实施,根据研究组计算接受干预措施的患者比例。过程结果是在大约三分之一的干预患者中进行测量的,包括以下内容:确定的药物差异数量、DRPs 和解决 DRPs 的建议、差异的纠正率以及建议的实施率。

结果和讨论

MedBridge 试验共纳入 2637 名患者(平均年龄:81 岁)。在住院期间,接受预期干预措施的干预患者(n=1745)的比例为 94%-98%,出院后为 40%-81%。接受至少一个非预期干预措施的对照组患者(n=892)的比例为 15%。平均而言,在 652 名干预患者中发现了 1.1 个差异和 2.0 个 DRPs。纠正和实施率分别为 79%和 73%。停止用药是最常实施的建议(n=293),77%的患者至少有一个差异得到纠正或建议得到实施。

新内容和结论

MedBridge 试验中 CMRs 的干预保真度在住院期间较高,而出院后和出院后的干预措施较低。纠正差异和实施建议的高患病率可能解释了 CMRs 在 MedBridge 试验中的潜在效果。

相似文献

1
Intervention fidelity and process outcomes of medication reviews including post-discharge follow-up in older hospitalized patients: Process evaluation of the MedBridge trial.药物评估包括出院后随访对老年住院患者的干预效果和过程结果:MedBridge 试验的过程评估。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1021-1029. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13128. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
2
Effects of Hospital-Based Comprehensive Medication Reviews Including Postdischarge Follow-up on Older Patients' Use of Health Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于医院的综合药物评估(包括出院后随访)对老年患者医疗保健利用的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216303. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6303.
3
Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands.老年多重用药患者的临床用药评估:荷兰药物相关问题的横断面研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0199-8. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Impact of an enhanced pharmacy discharge service on prescribing appropriateness criteria: a randomised controlled trial.强化药房出院服务对处方适宜性标准的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):1194-205. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0186-0. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
5
A dual intervention in geriatric patients to prevent drug-related problems and improve discharge management.对老年患者进行双重干预以预防药物相关问题并改善出院管理。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1189-1198. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0643-7. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Analysis of clinical outcomes in older individuals who received pharmaceutical care and posthospital discharge follow-up.分析接受药学保健和出院后随访的老年个体的临床结局。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Sep;30(6):1008-1016. doi: 10.1111/jep.14010. Epub 2024 May 19.
7
The effect of SENATOR (Software ENgine for the Assessment and optimisation of drug and non-drug Therapy in Older peRsons) on incident adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in an older hospital cohort - Trial Protocol.SENATOR(老年人药物和非药物治疗评估与优化软件)对老年住院患者新发药物不良反应(ADR)的影响 - 试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1047-9.
8
Facilitators and barriers for performing comprehensive medication reviews and follow-up by multiprofessional teams in older hospitalised patients.多专业团队对老年住院患者进行全面药物治疗评估和随访的促进因素和障碍。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;76(6):775-784. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02846-8. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Drug therapy problems and medication discrepancies during care transitions in super-utilizers.频繁就医者在医疗转换期间的药物治疗问题和用药差异。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Nov-Dec;56(6):633-642.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Large scale implementation of clinical medication reviews in Dutch community pharmacies: drug-related problems and interventions.在荷兰社区药店中大规模实施临床用药审查:药物相关问题和干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Jun;36(3):630-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9947-4. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality.住院患者的药物审查以降低发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD008986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub4.
2
Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitional pharmaceutical care programme: Process evaluation of Medication Actions to Reduce hospital admissions through a collaboration between Community and Hospital pharmacists (MARCH).实施药剂师主导的过渡性药物治疗计划:通过社区和医院药剂师之间的合作减少住院人数的药物行动(MARCH)的过程评估。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Jul;47(7):1049-1069. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13645. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Assessment of requests for medication-related follow-up after hospital discharge, and the relation to unplanned hospital revisits, in older patients: a multicentre retrospective chart review.
评估老年患者出院后与药物相关的随访需求,及其与非计划性住院复诊的关系:一项多中心回顾性图表研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02564-5.
4
Effects of Hospital-Based Comprehensive Medication Reviews Including Postdischarge Follow-up on Older Patients' Use of Health Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于医院的综合药物评估(包括出院后随访)对老年患者医疗保健利用的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216303. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6303.