Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2ER, United Kingdom; Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, United Kingdom.
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 May;103:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104444. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Currently, the strongest evidence for preventing violence against children lies with social learning theory-based parenting interventions. An increasing number of experimental studies on such interventions have been conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in East and Southeast Asia.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of parenting interventions in preventing violence against children.
Parents and primary caregivers living in LMICs in East and Southeast Asia.
Eleven studies were retrieved through electronic databases, expert contacts, and the reference sections of previous reviews. Studies were appraised for risk of bias and effect estimates pooled using random effects multilevel meta-analysis.
Forty-four effect estimates were meta-analyzed based on five outcome category models, finding a small effect on abusive, harsh, or negative parenting (n = 3, d = -0.42, 95 % CI [- 0.81, -0.02], p < .01, I = 72 %); a large, non-significant effect on parental knowledge or attitudes (n = 5, d = 1.40, 95 % CI [-0.30, 3.10], I = 95 %); a small effect on positive parent-child interactions (n = 5, d = 0.25, 95 % CI [0.19, 0.32], p < .001, I = 0); a small, non-significant effect on parental stress (n = 2, d = -0.13, 95 % CI [-0.38, 0.11], I = 0); and a small, non-significant effect on family environment (n = 3, d = 0.21, 95 % CI [-0.12, 0.53], I = 85 %).
The results suggest that parenting interventions can reduce rates of particular forms of violence against children, as well as promote positive parent-child interactions.
目前,预防儿童暴力的最有力证据来自基于社会学习理论的育儿干预措施。越来越多的此类干预措施的实验研究已经在东亚和东南亚的中低收入国家(LMICs)进行。
对预防儿童暴力的育儿干预措施的有效性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
生活在东亚和东南亚中低收入国家的父母和主要照顾者。
通过电子数据库、专家联系和以前综述的参考文献部分检索到 11 项研究。对研究进行偏倚风险评估,并使用随机效应多水平荟萃分析汇总效应估计值。
根据五种结果类别模型,对 44 个效应估计值进行了荟萃分析,发现对虐待、苛刻或消极的育儿方式有较小的影响(n=3,d=-0.42,95%CI[-0.81,-0.02],p<0.01,I=72%);对父母知识或态度有较大但无统计学意义的影响(n=5,d=1.40,95%CI[-0.30,3.10],I=95%);对积极的亲子互动有较小的影响(n=5,d=0.25,95%CI[0.19,0.32],p<0.001,I=0);对父母压力有较小但无统计学意义的影响(n=2,d=-0.13,95%CI[-0.38,0.11],I=0);对家庭环境有较小但无统计学意义的影响(n=3,d=0.21,95%CI[-0.12,0.53],I=85%)。
结果表明,育儿干预措施可以降低某些形式的儿童暴力发生率,并促进积极的亲子互动。