El-Khani Aala, Idriss-Wheeler Dina, Chea Santana, Darwish Shatha, Maalouf Wadih
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section, Drug Prevention and Health Branch, Division of Operations, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria.
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Children (Basel). 2025 May 31;12(6):728. doi: 10.3390/children12060728.
Children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at increased risk of emotional and behavioural challenges, often linked to caregiver stress and harsh parenting practices. Strengthening family functioning through parenting interventions is a critical strategy for improving child mental health in these settings. The Strong Families programme was developed as a light-touch family skills intervention for high-stress, low-resource environments. A multisite pilot feasibility and acceptability study was conducted in Cambodia with 40 families. Caregivers and children (aged 8-15) participated in a 3-week intervention, with one session per week. Data were collected using the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R) at baseline, two weeks, and six weeks post-intervention. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman's ANOVA were used to assess changes over time. Caregivers showed statistically significant improvements across all PAFAS subscales. For example, coercive parenting scores decreased from 8.13 at baseline to 4.00 post-intervention and 2.33 at follow-up (F(2,78) = 59.76, < 0.001). Positive encouragement improved from 2.60 to 1.00 and 0.33, respectively (F(2,78) = 27.05, < 0.001). In terms of child outcomes, SDQ total difficulty scores declined from 20.68 to 16.55 over time (F(2,78) = 7.58, = 0.001). Emotional problems dropped from 5.60 to 2.38 (χ(2) = 21.17, < 0.001), and conduct problems from 4.33 to 2.68 (F(2,78) = 11.35, < 0.001). Prosocial behaviours increased from 5.60 to 9.45 (F(2,78) = 69.93, < 0.001). Personal resilience scores rose from 32.70 at baseline to 47.48 at follow-up (χ(2) = 62.42, < 0.001), while caregiver resilience improved from 23.63 to 33.63 (χ(2) = 61.83, < 0.001). Improvements were particularly pronounced among families with the highest baseline challenges. Findings indicate that the Strong Families programme is feasible and effective in improving parenting skills, family adjustment, child mental health, and resilience in a Cambodian LMIC context. These results reinforce the programme's potential for integration into broader national strategies to improve psychosocial outcomes for families in high-stress, low-resource environments.
生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的儿童面临情感和行为挑战的风险增加,这通常与照顾者压力和严厉的育儿方式有关。通过育儿干预加强家庭功能是改善这些环境中儿童心理健康的关键策略。“强大家庭”计划是作为一种针对高压力、低资源环境的轻松家庭技能干预措施而制定的。在柬埔寨对40个家庭进行了一项多地点试点可行性和可接受性研究。照顾者和儿童(8至15岁)参加了为期3周的干预,每周一次。在基线、干预后两周和六周时,使用育儿与家庭调整量表(PAFAS)、优势与困难问卷(SDQ)以及儿童和青少年复原力测量量表(CYRM-R)收集数据。使用重复测量方差分析和弗里德曼方差分析来评估随时间的变化。照顾者在所有PAFAS子量表上均显示出统计学上的显著改善。例如,强制育儿得分从基线时的8.13降至干预后的4.00和随访时的2.33(F(2,78) = 59.76,< 0.001)。积极鼓励分别从2.60提高到1.00和0.33(F(2,78) = 27.05,< 0.001)。就儿童结果而言,SDQ总困难得分随时间从20.68降至16.55(F(2,78) = 7.58,= 0.001)。情绪问题从5.60降至2.38(χ(2) = 21.17,< 0.001),品行问题从4.33降至2.68(F(2,78) = 11.35,< 0.001)。亲社会行为从5.60增加到9.45(F(2,78) = 69.93,< 0.001)。个人复原力得分从基线时的32.70升至随访时的47.48(χ(2) = 62.42,< 0.001),而照顾者复原力从23.63提高到33.63(χ(2) = 61.83,< 0.001)。在基线挑战最高的家庭中,改善尤为明显。研究结果表明,“强大家庭”计划在柬埔寨低收入和中等收入国家背景下,在提高育儿技能、家庭调整、儿童心理健康和复原力方面是可行且有效的。这些结果强化了该计划融入更广泛国家战略以改善高压力、低资源环境中家庭心理社会结果的潜力。