Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University Institute of Maia, ISMAI, Maia, Portugal.
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Sport and Health Sciences Cluster (SHSC), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Apr;120(4):925-933. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04334-4. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
To examine the accuracy of practical indirect methods (i.e., recreational football match and estimation equations) in assessing individual maximal heart rate (HR) in recreational football players. Sixty-two untrained male participants engaged in a recreational football intervention (age 39.3 ± 5.8 years, VO 41.2 ± 6.2 ml·kg·min, body mass 81.9 ± 10.8 kg, height 173.2 ± 6.4 cm) were tested for HR using a multiple approach, at baseline and post-intervention (i.e., in the untrained and trained status, respectively). Observed HR was plotted against peak match HR (Match-HR) and HR estimated from prediction equations (EstHR) at both time-points.
In the untrained status, only the 211 - 0.64 × Age and 226 - Age equations showed non-significant (medium-to-small) differences with observed HR. The differences between observed HR and Match-HR were large (P < 0.0001). At post-intervention, the observed HR (Post-HR) was significantly and largely lower than at baseline. The prediction equations under consideration provided EstHR values that were lower than Post-HR, with small-to-large differences (P > 0.05). The exception was for the 226 - Age and 211 - 0.64 × Age equations, with values largely higher than Post-HR.
This study suggests caution when considering EstHR and Match-HR in recreational football interventions to track HR. The accuracy of EstHR may vary according to training status, suggesting the need for different approaches and equations across training interventions.
检验实用间接方法(即休闲足球比赛和估计方程)在评估休闲足球运动员个体最大心率(HR)时的准确性。
62 名未经训练的男性参与者参与了一项休闲足球干预(年龄 39.3±5.8 岁,VO 41.2±6.2ml·kg·min,体重 81.9±10.8kg,身高 173.2±6.4cm),分别在干预前(即未训练状态)和干预后(即训练状态)使用多种方法测试 HR。在两个时间点上,将观察到的 HR 与峰值比赛 HR(Match-HR)和预测方程(EstHR)估计的 HR 进行比较。
在未训练状态下,只有 211-0.64×年龄和 226-年龄方程与观察到的 HR 没有显著差异(中到小)。观察到的 HR 与 Match-HR 之间的差异较大(P<0.0001)。干预后,观察到的 HR(Post-HR)明显低于基线时。所考虑的预测方程提供的 EstHR 值低于 Post-HR,差异较小到较大(P>0.05)。例外的是 226-年龄和 211-0.64×年龄方程,其值明显高于 Post-HR。
本研究建议在休闲足球干预中使用 EstHR 和 Match-HR 来跟踪 HR 时要谨慎。EstHR 的准确性可能因训练状态而异,这表明在不同的训练干预中需要不同的方法和方程。