de Miguel Álvarez Ana
Departamento de Economía Aplicada I, Historia e Instituciones Económicas y Filosofía Moral, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España.
Gac Sanit. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):379-382. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
The aim of this article is to argue for the need and urgency to open an interdisciplinary debate on the goals of critical sexual education. From a philosophical and gender approach, the consequences of generalized online access to pornography, a profitable business, are analyzed as a school of sexuality for youth. The article deals with the violence and misogyny of many of the most visited contents and poses two hypothesis to debate. Firstly, pornography is subject to a process of erotizing violence, which may become a new space of legitimization of inequality between female and male teenagers. Secondly, a mismatch exists between the expectations of female and male teenagers regarding what a good sexual life is. Movements such as Me too and Cuéntalo as well as social polarization over trials like that of "the herd" would confirm such a mismatch. The conclusions reflect on the contradictions in societies, committed to equality, which increasingly tolerate less sexual abuse and aggression and at the same time are becoming more tolerant towards pornographic contents freely accessed by young people as a school of misogyny and violence. Some of the most serious consequences of those contradictions are dealt with by way of three current examples.
本文旨在论证就批判性性教育目标展开跨学科辩论的必要性和紧迫性。从哲学和性别视角出发,分析了广泛的网络色情内容(一项盈利业务)作为青少年性取向的一个流派所带来的后果。本文探讨了许多热门内容中的暴力和厌女现象,并提出两个有待辩论的假设。首先,色情作品正经历一个将暴力色情化的过程,这可能成为男女青少年不平等合法化的新空间。其次,男女青少年对美好性生活的期望存在差异。“Me too”和“Cuéntalo”等运动以及像“羊群”审判那样的社会两极分化都证实了这种差异。结论反思了致力于平等的社会中的矛盾,这些社会越来越不能容忍性虐待和攻击行为,与此同时,却对年轻人自由获取的色情内容越来越宽容,而这些内容是厌女和暴力的一个流派。通过三个当前的例子来探讨这些矛盾的一些最严重后果。